Did that thing that never happens, happen again?

Did that thing that never happens, happen again?

I never said Trans people don't exist. I have been told here numerous times that this doesn't happen, and it's a made scenario used to exclude people.

But they do exist AND despite being told they are increasingly winning more and more womens events... I keep seeing more and more events one by Transgender competitors.

So what's your actual point there Donnerboy? Because I think you were looking to land a zinger and whiffed badly

I really need to proof read more.

* Made up scenario
** being told it doesn't happen, they are increasingly...

A decent compromise might be then they can compete, but not displace someone from the Podium, qualifying positions, etc...

And you'll quickly see it's not a great compromise. A great compromise is that everyone refers to them as a female, uses their pronouns, etc... but if they want to compete, it's against the boys.

If we are going to have a mixed biology event. Then have it in the boys group, not the girls. Gender doesn't matter, so why does it HAVE to be the girls that make concession?

What a weak deflection, I and I'm sure others aren't jealous.

And is that the line you and the left uses to choose what's important? If people have shown a large interest in something in the past? Not right and wrong? That's interesting.

Even given that bar, I've been interested in women's sports for the majority of my life as I have family members, female, that compete. One at the national level.

Also, why would protecting women's sports been an issue for the general public to "care" about? It wasn't something that was at risk. So other than enjoying them, and knowing they existed for women to enjoy.

Why do you care about climate change you didn't care about it before we knew that CO2 was rising? You only care now that we see negative effects. Sounds pretty dumb right? So do you.

So women should adapt? Or die off? Because they should have to adapt to men, that want to play in their sports, and if they don't we'll just not have women in women's sports?

Is that really the argument you want to go with? Mysogynistic and Racist, that's certainly one approach.

#22 Yes racist, if you can't see it, I can't help you there.

Trans athletes should compete in the mens/boys. Exercising their rights shouldn't restrict women's rights. They have a right to compete, not saying they don't. They don't have a right to women's sports though.

To answer your question snoofy, exactly because of the Testosterone I'd put them in the mens category too for competition.

None of this is a perfect solution. But it allows everyone to play/compete, while not interfering with the rights of girls/women.

At least this way everyone gets to participate

men =/= women. They are different.

Are you claiming that black people are different? Please tell us how black people are a different thing than white people. Should be interesting.

"Your entire agenda here is denying that a woman can be born anything but female. That's it."

yes.

A man can become a trans woman, a trans woman is not the same thing as a woman. Close neighbors, but they are not in the same house.

How does "I have family that competes in women's sports" translate to you that this topic makes me question my sexuality.

It's comments like that, that really show you're the one with the sick viewpoint on this subject. Seek some ------- help man, not everyone views life through questioning their sexuality. You need help.

What is your bizarre fascination with making this a hidden sexual fascination? This is a matter of sporting and fairness.

Your insistence that it has to be more than that for me seems more like projection on your part at this point honestly.

Yet you're the one who keeps barking about. Have you considered discussing this from a fairness perspective and not a sexualized fantasy perspective?

Or would you rather keep throwing rocks at yourself, and yelping about it?

"I have made it very clear.
1 )This does not bother me.
2 ) It will eventually work itself out."

It's interesting that it doesn't bother you. A core tenet in the lefts platform is protecting right especially historically minimalized groups. Here though you have two groups that meet the criteria, so for the left it's a circular firing squad. You can't back on minimalized group without impacting the other. The only answer is that one group, trans or women, aren't going to get everything they want.

Your response there, Is it doesn't bother me... and it'll work itself out.

In any other circumstance, you'd be all in on the side of the the group that is pushing for their rights. It's not clear cut here though so you claim disinterest, and claim sexual fetish for anyone that does want to weigh in on the topic. smh