9

Oh, it's a huge screw up on Trump's part. That's what makes it different.

Not the size of the bailout.

Not our first embargo.

"In 1979, US President Jimmy Carter issued an embargo on the export of wheat to the Soviet Union as a response to the Soviet"Afghan War. But the embargo did not bring any positive effect to the USA. The Soviet Union eluded the embargo by increasing its domestic wheat production and importing from other countries. The Reagan administration lifted the embargo in 1981, but US farmers suffered financially, leading the US government to introduce bailout programs to the dairy industry. Bailouts helped the dairy industry to increase production however the US government had to buy all oversupply. Later the Reagan administration spent $100 million annually to store and transport all dairy oversupply worth $3 billion from the previous administration.[17][12]"

-Any comment on point #2?

an embargo that's not worked...or at least not worked yet and comes with significant consequences....that any thinking person would have known would lead to this bailout.

15

which republicans? elected officials or farmers?

-Thanks for proving my point #2.

I'm glad you view my words as "proof".

But it's really just agreement.

Shouldn't the democrats make this an issue?

Run on the bailout as being necessary only because of horrible incompetence in the first place.

Point out that even with this bailout, farmers are still suffering unnecessarily. It could have been avoided. IOW, outright point the finger at the entire republican party for this mess.

Is it futile? Meaning that even if the democrats did this....they still can't expect to get anywhere some swing states? Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, etc....can't they pick up seats in congress and turn some of those states blue in the presidential election over this issue?