Monday, March 30, 2026

Architects Skeptical of Trump's White House Ballroom Plan

A New York Times interactive feature published Sunday takes an in-depth look at President Donald Trump's proposed White House ballroom ahead of a critical federal vote Thursday -- with architects warning the project's rushed timeline has left serious design flaws unaddressed that could permanently alter the nation's most iconic address.

Posted by retort at 10:39 AM | 23 COMMENTS | permalink

More

President Trump's ballroom design has rushed toward construction, with little time for public review of this major addition to the White House. Architects say it shows.

[image or embed]

-- The New York Times (@nytimes.com) Mar 29, 2026 at 8:10 PM

Comments

Don't build this abomination.

If it is built, tear it down.

When Trump dies, we don't want help remembering him.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-30 11:07 AM

The "ballroom" would be a nice place to exhibit trump's stuffed corpse. If any of it survives the conflagration.

#2 | Posted by AustinTX at 2026-03-30 11:30 AM

I find it sadly humorous that now Der Dotard is talking up the 'military' necessity for this demonstration of narcissistic destruction and tastelessness. A week or two from now, our president will be blaming 'the generals' for this slap in the face of every American. It will be 'Oh, they wanted it, I never did. They need it for national security. Otherwise I don't know anything about this...' Clip and save...

#3 | Posted by catdog at 2026-03-30 12:12 PM

They're just trying to keep it in the "planning stage" until blimpo croaks... then they're outa there.

fantasy guy forts like the bunker bozos go for

#4 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-03-30 03:24 PM

Pedophiles get prison, not ballrooms.

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-30 04:01 PM

Who cares what architects think when you have Grok!

#6 | Posted by horstngraben at 2026-03-30 04:07 PM

One of those columns needs to be Plexiglas and have Barron encased in it.

#7 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-30 11:06 PM

If they're going to reference something the architects said...then maybe quote them.

That's deliberately left out of the article.

I have no problem believing architects expressing concern over something like this but not quoting them is a red flag.

#8 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-30 11:15 PM

" not quoting them is a red flag."

They might've wanted to avoid the death threats.

YOU KNOW there would be death threats, to any very public critic of His Orangeness.

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-30 11:28 PM

If they're going to reference something the architects said...then maybe quote them.

Very tall!!!

LOL This is hilarious

#10 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-03-31 01:04 AM

And not only is the design irrational, it is ugly, as if Melania used AI to design it. One wonders if President Newsom would be able to tear it down.

#11 | Posted by Hughmass at 2026-03-31 07:04 AM

-They might've wanted to avoid the death threats.

How does this avoid the death threats? The architects' identity is a matter of public record.

So if somebody's willing to send a death threat over criticism and it's gonna happen anyway, because we know who the architects are.

www.archpaper.com

#12 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-31 12:09 PM

Then it's gonna happen anyway ... ...

#13 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-31 12:10 PM

I have no problem believing architects expressing concern over something like this but not quoting them is a red flag.
#8 | Posted by eberly

Red flag for what?

You believing it, which you just said you don't have a problem with?

I don't get it.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 12:16 PM

Pearl clutching by Eb's on line #8.

Blue light Special on line #15.

#15 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-31 12:34 PM

Pearl necklace licking by effetetrumpvoter on line #9

One poster after another reveal the reality that they don't want the truth, they just want to be told what they wanna hear.

It's kind of scary to realize that people have no stomach for the truth

#16 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-31 12:41 PM

You're just Realizing this NOW.

Trump lies about Everything, Constantly,he got Reelected because of it, not in Spite of it.

Nobody wants the Truth.

We Can't Handle the Truth.

Lies are Comforting. Lies are good for poor self Esteem.

Lies Protect us from Worry about things we don't Control.

All in All Lies,... Just Rock!

If Everything was the Absolute Truth, life couldn't go on. Illusions are Necessary to Prevent Dispair.

The Truth is Damned Depressing to be Honest.

That's why Music and Art and all those things are so popular.

They're Sugar on the Bitter Disappointment.

#17 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-31 01:12 PM

Despair...

#18 | Posted by Effeteposer at 2026-03-31 01:15 PM

They might've wanted to avoid the death threats.
#9 | Posted by Danforth

Getting blackballed is probably a more realistic concern.

The construction business leans heavily Republican, as Republicans are more likely to give developers zoning easements and tax incentives to build their ------ properties.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 01:19 PM

"Getting blackballed is probably a more realistic concern."

Good point. Financial death threats.

#20 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-31 01:21 PM

"It's kind of scary to realize that people have no stomach for the truth"

What a riot, coming from the DR guy with the most sand in his ears.

Eb, 24 hours ago, you couldn't admit the outlets you watch didn't inform you Trump brought up banning trans athletes at the Olympics recently.

That sounds like you "don't want the truth, (you) just want to be told what (you) wanna hear."

#21 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-31 01:26 PM

"It's kind of scary to realize that people have no stomach for the truth"

Quite the opposite.
Trump raped those girls.
Tens of millions of Republicans know it.
Tens of millions of Republicans don't care.

That's the actual awful truth in all this, Eberly.

#22 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-31 01:33 PM

Judge halts White House ballroom construction project
www.newsnationnow.com

... A federal judge on Tuesday halted construction on President Trump's White House ballroom project.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon said that no statute "comes close" to granting Trump the authority he claims he has to execute the $400 million project, barring construction from continuing until Congress authorizes its completion.

"The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families," Leon wrote. "He is not, however, the owner!" ...


#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-31 03:32 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Judge says Trump Can't Add his Name to Kennedy Center (59 comments)

'Drug Boat' Strikes Claim 205 Lives (57 comments)

Iran Stops Negotiations, Vows to 'completely' Block Strait (54 comments)

What it Means to be a Man in the Texas Senate Race (28 comments)

US Healthcare Still Expensive, with Pathetic Outcomes (27 comments)

No Fat Troops at White House UFC Fight (21 comments)

ICE Sued Over 'inhumane' Conditions at Camp East Montana in West Texas (20 comments)

Kids Go Crazy for Caffeine Pouches (19 comments)

Trump Attacks Artists Dropping Out of US Freedom 250 Concert (15 comments)

Minnesota GOP Convention has Moment of Silence for Derek Chauvin (14 comments)