Architects Skeptical of Trump's White House Ballroom Plan

Monday, March 30, 2026

A New York Times interactive feature published Sunday takes an in-depth look at President Donald Trump's proposed White House ballroom ahead of a critical federal vote Thursday -- with architects warning the project's rushed timeline has left serious design flaws unaddressed that could permanently alter the nation's most iconic address.

Posted by retort at 10:39 AM | 9 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

President Trump's ballroom design has rushed toward construction, with little time for public review of this major addition to the White House. Architects say it shows.

[image or embed]
-- The New York Times (@nytimes.com) Mar 29, 2026 at 8:10 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Don't build this abomination.

If it is built, tear it down.

When Trump dies, we don't want help remembering him.

#1 | Posted by Zed at 2026-03-30 11:07 AM | Reply

The "ballroom" would be a nice place to exhibit trump's stuffed corpse. If any of it survives the conflagration.

#2 | Posted by AustinTX at 2026-03-30 11:30 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

I find it sadly humorous that now Der Dotard is talking up the 'military' necessity for this demonstration of narcissistic destruction and tastelessness. A week or two from now, our president will be blaming 'the generals' for this slap in the face of every American. It will be 'Oh, they wanted it, I never did. They need it for national security. Otherwise I don't know anything about this...' Clip and save...

#3 | Posted by catdog at 2026-03-30 12:12 PM | Reply

They're just trying to keep it in the "planning stage" until blimpo croaks... then they're outa there.

fantasy guy forts like the bunker bozos go for

#4 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2026-03-30 03:24 PM | Reply

Pedophiles get prison, not ballrooms.

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-30 04:01 PM | Reply

Who cares what architects think when you have Grok!

#6 | Posted by horstngraben at 2026-03-30 04:07 PM | Reply

One of those columns needs to be Plexiglas and have Barron encased in it.

#7 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-03-30 11:06 PM | Reply

If they're going to reference something the architects said...then maybe quote them.

That's deliberately left out of the article.

I have no problem believing architects expressing concern over something like this but not quoting them is a red flag.

#8 | Posted by eberly at 2026-03-30 11:15 PM | Reply

" not quoting them is a red flag."

They might've wanted to avoid the death threats.

YOU KNOW there would be death threats, to any very public critic of His Orangeness.

#9 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-03-30 11:28 PM | Reply