Advertisement
Donald Trump had a Fantastic Day in the Supreme Court
Thursday's argument in Trump v. United States was a disaster for Special Counsel Jack Smith, and for anyone who believes that the president of the United States should be subject to prosecution if they commit a crime.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
jpw
Joined 2006/08/11Visited 2024/07/26
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Report: Police Had Photo of Crooks 26 Minutes Before Shooting (93 comments) ...
Let's Talk About Replacing Biden, Speed and 3 Voters... (0 comments) ...
SCOTUS Affirms Government Can Fact Check Social Media (22 comments) ...
Conservative Groups Creating List of Fed Employees to Fire (25 comments) ...
Supreme Court's Gun Rights Decision Deepens the Cracks in Originalism (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
We find that the former president gets a pass for shooting that person on Fifth Avenue ... -SCOTUS righties
#1 | Posted by catdog at 2024-04-27 04:38 PM | Reply
Sharpen your pitch forks we got some justice for some sold out Justices!
#2 | Posted by danni at 2024-04-27 05:29 PM | Reply
Any chance they put Obama in the same prison with Trump?
I've heard some prisons won't allow co-conspirators to do time together.
#3 | Posted by tres_flechas at 2024-04-27 07:42 PM | Reply
John Adams, our first Vice-President and our second President, is quoted as having observed that, "Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
Seems a rather prescient comment by one of our Founding Fathers, now doesn't it...
OCU
#4 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-04-27 08:18 PM | Reply
You are supposed to try them in absentia before you execute them with a hellfire missile. A unilateral fed decision without a court is not due process.
#5 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-04-28 09:25 AM | Reply
That guy had it coming but the feds came up short on their due diligence. It wasn't a combat action, no battle, just a hellfire execution short on paperwork.
#6 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-04-28 09:26 AM | Reply
Aleksei Navalny is what happens when your president has absolute immunity.
#7 | Posted by ScottE at 2024-04-28 12:26 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
#19 | POSTED BY SCOTTE
Nice to fantasize about Trump dying in a self-inflicted air strike about October.
#8 | Posted by Zed at 2024-04-28 12:50 PM | Reply
It wasn't a combat action, no battle, just a hellfire execution short on paperwork.
#18 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG With authorization from Congress. Congress initially authorized war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban in its 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, or AUMF, and the Obama administration continued to rely on that while also developing clear guidelines, oversight and accountability in the use of Drones and was later codified in Presidential Policy Guidance. And I am sure you remember that this was new tech that was not fully developed or available before and as Obama himself said: "This new technology [drones] raises profound questions " about who is targeted, and why; about civilian casualties, and the risk of creating new enemies; about the legality of such strikes under U.S. and international law; about accountability and morality."
#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-04-28 12:53 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable