Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, August 16, 2024

"This historic milestone marks a significant win for clean energy advocates, for ratepayers, and for people and communities across the country," said one climate leader.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Good.

#1 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-08-15 11:49 AM | Reply

"That's the stuff that powers the plants. It's not wind that goes around and around. Darling, let's watch the president's State of the Union speech tonight. I'm sorry, we won't be able to do it, the wind isn't blowing, darling. We have no electricity."

-Fat Donnie Lisper.

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-08-15 03:12 PM | Reply

From the cited article...

... During an April event in Florida, Trump told fossil fuel executives that if they invested just $1 billion into his campaign, he would gut the Biden-Harris administration's climate regulations. The Washington Post reported Tuesday that billionaire Continental Resources founder then "called other oil executives and encouraged them to attend fundraisers and open their wallets." ...

#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-16 01:29 PM | Reply

Gee Lamp, the man is like saying 'He's a Total Corporate Sellout' or something.

Or, I guess, just a Republican. Pretty much means the same thing.

#4 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-08-16 01:46 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#4 ... the man is like saying 'He's a Total Corporate Sellout' or something. ...

More generally, like selling the Oval Office to the highest bidder...

Interesting thing, though, Texas produces more green energy than any other state.


#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-16 01:57 PM | Reply

They produce a lot of wind energy here. It fits the geography. California is doing great with solar.

#6 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-08-16 03:13 PM | Reply

Here in Okiehomie it is reported that only about half of the state's wind energy capabilities have been developed. Guys like Harold Hamm could certainly diversify their energy production enterprises by including wind and solar development in the sooner or later state, but nooooooo.

There are times when renewable energy powers the entire state and there is enough wind and solar energy generated here that Oklahoma can power the entire city of Chicago. And the capacity is still there to do more? Why not? Asking for a world ...

#7 | Posted by catdog at 2024-08-16 03:51 PM | Reply

@#6

... and the Northwest produces a lot of hydro power.

#8 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-16 04:16 PM | Reply

California is doing great with solar.

#6 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

Yup.

When we have a solar energy spill here we call it just another day.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-16 08:24 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#7

Half? Really?

I mean, the last time I drove I-40 through that state it was pretty windy. It's been a while, but I don't remember seeing wind turbines everywhere there definitely should have been. I'd be shocked if that state was even at 5% of capacity.

#10 | Posted by DarkVader at 2024-08-16 09:08 PM | Reply

They produce a lot of wind energy here. It fits the geography. California is doing great with solar.

#6 | Posted by sitzkrieg

For a look at the current sources of electricity production in California, go to:

www.caiso.com

OCU

#11 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-08-17 12:58 PM | Reply

__________
In July, Wind and Solar Produced More Power than Coal ...

... in the USA... and the same headline will be made in August, September, October, November, December, and all next year, etc.

The headline makes it seem that it's the result of vastly increased generation and/or consumption of "intermittent renewables" / VRE - the reality is that it's the result of lower production of coal for consumption in the US (most of it now is exported to China, India and other countries who are building more coal plants at furious pace) and shutting down coal power plants in favor of increasing number and use of gas-powered energy plants. NG ("fossil fuel" ? / "Green Energy" ? "a mother and a daughter") is now generating more than 45% of total energy in the US.

Wind and solar VRE can be used where it may be beneficial, particularly off-main-grid, but they've already have shown themselves to be TCO-expensive, requiring higher use of manual labor, recycling issues, environmentally damaging, etc. dead-end technologies for utility-scale installations (with batteries and "firm power" backup), and number of manufacturers and suppliers went bankrupt or wrote off $Billons as the saturation point has approached and demand for turbines and panels went down relative to hyped up projections - e.g.,
"Nov 15, 2023 " Siemens Energy reviews wind unit set-up after $5 billion loss | Siemens Energy may exit some markets and products of its struggling wind turbine business"

Because of geographic limitations of further buildouts, the use of hydroelectric power as a percentage of total energy generation in the US (currently at less than 6%) will also go down.

For more details see drudge.com - "American Interest in Electric Vehicles Short Circuits"
__________

#12 | Posted by CutiePie at 2024-08-17 05:24 PM | Reply

For a look at the current sources of electricity production in California, go to:

#11 | Posted by OCUser at 2024-08-17 12:58 PM | Reply | Flag:

I don't see methodology. It seems to be counting industrial grid generation while leaving out grid-tied solar. Other sources put California solar as the #2 energy production type in the state. There's so much home rooftop solar in California they've had to de-incentivize it because there's nowhere to store the excess.

#13 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2024-08-18 09:43 AM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort