Advertisement
New Law Allows Australians to Ignore after Hours Work Calls and Emails
Australian employees now have the right to ignore their bosses outside working hours thanks to a new law which enshrines the "right to disconnect."
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
retort
Joined 2003/04/04Visited 2003/04/04
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Texas Lawmakers Push for New Exceptions to State's Strict Abortion Ban After the Deaths of Two Women (2 comments) ...
Georgia Dismissed All Members of Maternal Mortality Committee After ProPublica Obtained Internal Details of Two Deaths (2 comments) ...
How Tulsi Gabbard Became a Favorite of Russia's State Media (15 comments) ...
I Sleep in My Office -- the Rest of Congress Should, Too (14 comments) ...
Texas Education Board Backs Bible-Infused Lessons in Public Schools (17 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Well it is actually illegal for them to call/email in parts of Europe such as France...
#1 | Posted by GalaxiePete at 2024-08-27 06:29 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
I'm for that.
#2 | Posted by Wardog at 2024-08-27 06:34 PM | Reply
So... something I do already.
Co-worker: Why didn't you answer my phone call?
Me: I wasn't working.
#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-08-27 06:39 PM | Reply
Seeeeeee... this is what happens when you make voting mandatory for all adults.
#4 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2024-08-27 10:36 PM | Reply
#3 | POSTED BY
Easy to say if someones life and or property were not at risk if you don't respond.
#5 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-28 12:38 PM | Reply
I think this is an excellent policy.
#6 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-08-28 12:51 PM | Reply
@#5 ... if someones life and or property were not at risk if you don't respond. ...
That's a different scenario. In such a situation, the callee is likely to be "on call," i.e., expecting such calls.
I once got a work call from a drunk-sounding manager at 9:30PM on a Saturday evening. Nothing in the call was that important, it could have waited until he saw me Monday morning.
#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-08-28 12:52 PM | Reply
Some of this is already in effect here. If a non-exempt employee is asked to answer a call or email off hours then they are to be paid for their time.
Exempt employees are where this impacts things much more, IMO.
#8 | Posted by eberly at 2024-08-28 01:08 PM | Reply
"Exempt employees are where this impacts things much more"
Yup. Exempt and "essential " employees were impacted the most.
"That's a different scenario. In such a situation, the callee is likely to be "on call," i.e., expecting such calls."
Nope. I was "exempt". And classified as essential. Which had benefits in a government shutdown but was mostly used to not pay us overtime. Being "on call" also required extra pay. Which is why many exempt or essential civil servants are not paid to be "on call". As a "essential" salaried manager I was expected to respond even while off duty. My job was to call an employee (who was also not "on call" and try and convince them to come into work. But if I could not "convince" them (or they wisely did not answer the phone) then I had to respond to the problem myself. If I responded I would get paid for my time. Sometimes. There were rules for that too. Like a 2 hour minimum after 15 minutes etc.
#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-08-28 01:23 PM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable