Advertisement
Lindsey Graham: Trump's Pardoning of Capitol Rioters 'a Mistake'
A key ally of Trump's - Republican Senator Lindsey Graham - has told NBC the president shouldn't have pardoned violent 6 January defendants.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
REDIAL
Joined 2009/01/04Visited 2025/01/29
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Lindsey Graham: Trump's Pardoning of Capitol Rioters 'a Mistake' (9 comments) ...
Trump Says He 'would rather not' Impose Tariffs on China (17 comments) ...
Melania Trump Launches Her Own Cryptocurrency (20 comments) ...
TikTok Shuts Down in United States (27 comments) ...
Inauguration Moved Indoors Due to 'dangerous' Cold (27 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Trump's White House Liasion for DOJ responds to Lindsey Graham's criticism of pardons for violent Jan. 6 defendants: "Too bad!"[image or embed] -- Anna Bower (@annabower.bsky.social) January 26, 2025 at 12:52 PM
Trump's White House Liasion for DOJ responds to Lindsey Graham's criticism of pardons for violent Jan. 6 defendants: "Too bad!"[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Has his security detail been fired yet? Clearance revoked? Proud Boys surrounded his house?
#1 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-01-26 12:54 PM | Reply
Lady G has no credibility on any subject. Next.
#2 | Posted by morris at 2025-01-26 04:44 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2
Great big eye-roll on that one...
(fuggin' ash hole)
#3 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-01-27 07:55 PM | Reply
@#2 ... Lady G has no credibility on any subject. ...
While I do agree. Mostly. I agree mainly because Sen Graham has shown the (I'll be kind) need to agree with what the current person in the White House has said. Why? Well, I have opinions in that area, but I suspect that topic may be a whole different thread. :)
So, back to the topic of this thread ...
For Sen Graham to go against Pres Trump in an opinion that Sen Graham expressed is quite significant.
Stated differently, how far does Pres Trump have to stray from, I'll say, reality before Sen Graham decides to object?
#4 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-01-27 08:08 PM | Reply
Graham had no way of knowing Trump would do this when he was campaigning for him....except for the fact that Trump told us all far in advance that he would do this.
#5 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-01-27 08:16 PM | Reply
@#5 ... when he was campaigning for him ...
That is a good point.
How many people actively campaigned for candidate-Trump based upon what candidate-Trump said he would do if he were elected, and now those people seem to have ~buyers-remorse?~
#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-01-27 08:20 PM | Reply
Look who NOW cares what Linda Graham has to say.
#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-01-28 01:36 PM | Reply
The Mistake was in not impeaching Trumpy for his previous abuse of power and thereby condoning and even encouraging Trumpy's current abuse of power. Enjoy Mr Toads Wild ride (ver 2.0) This is what you voted for America.
#8 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-01-28 01:54 PM | Reply
The pardons were SOOOO last week
Of course, dems FINALLY came around and issued a pointless resolution.
Meanwhile the WH is stripping Congress of it' spending authority.
Dems should REALLY try to keep up.
#9 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-01-28 08:30 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2025 World Readable