Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, February 15, 2025

OpEd: During its first few weeks, the Trump Administration has unleashed a flurry of measures to radically reshape the federal government. Many of these moves are overtly unlawful. This paper identifies the legal problems with many of the most prominent actions: freezing funding, amending or repealing rules, and denying citizenship to children born in the United States.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

3. David Super, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center and an expert on administrative law, told Popular Information that the Trump administration is "in contempt of court" and the continued funding freeze at NIH is "completely unlawful." Let's break down how we got here.

[image or embed]

-- Judd Legum (@juddlegum.bsky.social) February 11, 2025 at 7:31 AM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the OpEd ...

... During its first few weeks, the Trump Administration has unleashed a flurry of measures to radically reshape the federal government. Many of these moves are overtly unlawful. This paper identifies the legal problems with many of the most prominent actions: freezing funding, amending or repealing rules, and denying citizenship to children born in the United States.[2] ...

Amending and Repealing Rules Without Following Statutorily Mandated Procedures

Since 1946, Congress has sought to improve the quality of administrative rules by requiring federal agencies to seek public comments when they promulgate, amend, or repeal rules. For most rule-making affecting the general public, this mandate appears in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).[20] For rules the Office of Personnel Management makes, a separate statute requires compliance with the APA.[21]

The Biden Administration followed the APA to promulgate rules on many of its top priorities, both in regulations protecting the general public and in rules protecting career civil servants from political coercion or discrimination. On some issues, it was unable to finish soliciting and responding to public comments and therefore abandoned making policy in those areas.

The new Administration, however, is repeatedly disregarding its statutory duty to seek public comment before it regulates. For example, the President directed the Office of Personnel Management to disregard a duly promulgated regulation giving federal employees the right to remain in their current classification if the Administration reclassified them into positions where they would lack security of tenure.[22] This is significant because the same executive order shifts large numbers of federal workers out of the non-political competitive service into positions where they may be fired at will. ...



#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-02-13 01:29 PM | Reply

Color me shocked.

#2 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-02-13 01:42 PM | Reply

He's never cared about the Law, and by the time these are adjudicated in the SC, some in his favor, it will be too late to matter; the damage will be done.

And his Base decided to care more about DJT than the Law several years ago.

#3 | Posted by Corky at 2025-02-13 02:05 PM | Reply

"Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal"
-the Republican Party

#4 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-02-13 02:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

He's an elected felon

#5 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-02-13 04:24 PM | Reply

of course they are......didn't expect anything else from you dopie opies...

whatcha gonna do if he signs an executive order STOPPING USAID altogether...

heads probably would explode....

can I pick the first ones to go ?.... BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

#6 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-02-14 01:21 PM | Reply

yes I know JFK signed EO creating usaid but then congress passed a bill about it that would mean

trump couldn't just sign it away....

I'm not am illiterate piece of worthless trashy dung like "you people"

but the image of heads exploding would disappear...

BWAAAAAA

#7 | Posted by shrimptacodan at 2025-02-14 01:24 PM | Reply

It's funny that the guy (Lamplighter) who constantly gives me crap for posting an op Ed just posted an op Ed.

#8 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-02-14 06:42 PM | Reply

Since when does breaking laws matter for the Insurrectionist in Chief?

The GOP already signed and delivered the Get Out of Jail Free card four years ago. What's a few thousand more crimes on top of his 34 felony convictions (that SCOTUS will toss into the ash-heap) anyway?

#9 | Posted by censored at 2025-02-15 04:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#8 | Posted by BellRinger

What a whiny little snowflake you are.

#10 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-02-15 07:45 PM | Reply

"It has become ever more apparent that, to our president, the rule of law is but an impediment to his policy goals. The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or simply ignore, whether that be for political or personal gain."

U.S. District Judge John Coughenour

#11 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2025-02-16 12:12 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort