Trump lifts US supersonic flight ban
It's boom time for the next generation of fast travel
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
lamplighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2025/06/09
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Vermont challenges Big Food: Local, organic, and bipartisan (1 comments) ...
Protesters on overpasses in CT, getting visits from Police (2 comments) ...
Trump may be the most accessible Pres, for spies or scammers (2 comments) ...
MAGA's blue-collar base waits patiently for populist payoff (7 comments) ...
Trump lifts US supersonic flight ban (11 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... On Friday, President Trump signed an executive order telling the FAA to lift its 52-year ban on supersonic flight over the US and told the FAA to devise a scheme to limit noise pollution from such aircraft. Supersonic flight has been banned over the US for civilian aircraft since 1973 after testing showed the noise it created was too disruptive, breaking windows in some cases. Since then, NASA and private startups have developed ways to reduce the sound of sonic booms from faster-than-Mach 1 flight, and there's currently legislation before Congress to allow these high-tech aircraft to fly over the US, potentially halving the flight time between New York and Los Angeles. Now the president has issued an order that does basically what the legislation, sponsored by four Republican senators, asked for. The FAA has also been instructed to devise a system to regulate such aircraft's noise levels in conjunction with "community acceptability, economic reasonableness, and technological feasibility," to allow flights over the homeland. ...
Supersonic flight has been banned over the US for civilian aircraft since 1973 after testing showed the noise it created was too disruptive, breaking windows in some cases. Since then, NASA and private startups have developed ways to reduce the sound of sonic booms from faster-than-Mach 1 flight, and there's currently legislation before Congress to allow these high-tech aircraft to fly over the US, potentially halving the flight time between New York and Los Angeles.
Now the president has issued an order that does basically what the legislation, sponsored by four Republican senators, asked for.
The FAA has also been instructed to devise a system to regulate such aircraft's noise levels in conjunction with "community acceptability, economic reasonableness, and technological feasibility," to allow flights over the homeland. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-08 06:40 PM | Reply
My guess would be that the FAA will optimize unfettered "economic reasonableness" over any "community acceptability" concerns.
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-08 06:42 PM | Reply
Doe 174 wants Lolita Express to go supersonic,
#3 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-08 06:45 PM | Reply
Meanwhile another plane dropped out of the sky in TN
#4 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-06-08 06:59 PM | Reply
US super sonic ban was put in place simply because of the Concorde, and America falling behind in the technology.
Everyone but Americans seem to understand this.
My guess is gaslighter doesn't understand why the ban was dropped. It had nothing to do with sonic booms the community could hear.
x.com
Its because America finally is catching up boomsupersonic.com
#5 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-08 07:08 PM | Reply
Meanwhile another plane dropped out of the sky in TN #4 | POSTED BY TRUTHHURTS
What is your implication? 2025 has been an average year for aviation. www.ntsb.gov
#6 | Posted by oneironaut at 2025-06-08 07:10 PM | Reply
@#2 ... My guess would be that the FAA will optimize unfettered "economic reasonableness" over any "community acceptability" concerns. ...
a.k.a., optimizing profits for the wealthy, while making more noise for everyone else.
My question would be, over which areas around the airports might the FAA send these booming flights?
High-income areas?
#7 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-08 08:00 PM | Reply
areas around the airports might the FAA send these booming flights?
It's not just the sonic booms. Back in the Concorde days the planes engines themselves made a lot more noise that regular airliners. Concorde had four aferburning turbojet engines that ran at full power on takeoff and relatively high power on landing. I saw one take off at YYC in the '80s and it was way louder than normal airport traffic.
#8 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-06-08 08:23 PM | Reply
YYZ, but who cares?
#9 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-06-08 08:24 PM | Reply
More people would care if Trump wasn't trying to get his war started in Los Angeles.
#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-08 08:27 PM | Reply | Funny: 1
@#9 ... YYZ, but who cares? ...
YYZ is Toronto's airport code.
My concern is more with JFK, LGA and EWR, i.e., the main NYC airports.
#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-08 09:21 PM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy