Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, September 17, 2025

D/FBI Kashyap Pramod Patel testified to US Senators that there is "no credible information" in case files that the notorious Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to anyone other than himself. During a heated hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) asked Patel about his knowledge of the Epstein files. "You've seen most of the files. Who if anyone did Epstein traffic these young women to, besides himself?" Patel responded, "Himself. There is no credible information, none. If there were I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again, is limited." Kennedy followed up, "So the answer is no one?" The worst FBI Director in the history of the US responded, "For the information that we have. In the case files."

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Senator Kennedy said such an explanation was unlikely to satisfy calls for greater transparency. "This issue is not going to go away," he warned. "The central question for the American people is this: They know Epstein trafficked young women for sex with himself. What they want to know is whether he trafficked them to anyone else." Previous testimonies from Epstein's victims have suggested they were trafficked for other individuals. Much of the discourse surrounding Epstein in recent months has centered on an alleged client list that was supposed to be released by USAG Pam Bondi. Patel noted that the available case files only contain "limited search warrants" from 2006 and 2007, because federal prosecutors in Florida had previously struck a deal with Epstein that allowed him to avoid prosecution for his earlier crimes. The Trumpf junta recently fired AUSA Maurene Comey who prosecuted Epstein's co-trafficker, the monstrous Ghislaine Maxwell. Lying to Congress is perjury, governed by 18 USC 1621. Perjury is defined by the context in which the lie is told. The main element is a willful false statement made under a legally administered oath during an official proceeding, such as a congressional hearing. The oath is the distinction that separates perjury from a false statement violation. A statement that is literally true, even if it is misleading, cannot be the basis for a perjury conviction.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WpBm2xgg_Bo/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEhCK4FEIIDSFryq4qpAxMIARUAAAAAGAElAADIQj0AgKJD&rs=AOn4CLABn_-xS5N9UAGFWdsNr3wbz8Ud7g

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort