US Government Targets Cop City Protester Over Phone Operating System

Friday, July 31, 2026

Concern over US effort to prosecute Sam Tunick, accused by authorities of wiping his phone using GrapheneOS

Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 10:33 AM | 11 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

The government is prosecuting US citizen Sam Tunick for allegedly providing authorities with a "duress password" that wiped his phone when they tried to seize it at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport.

[image or embed]
-- The Verge (@theverge.com) 8:51 AM Â· Jul 27, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

The crushers are shamelessly and remorselessly persecuting Samaritan Samuel Tunick. We trust he has an Irish lawyer from the federal defender's office advocating for him.

An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-07-29 11:18 AM | Reply

5th Amendment, anyone?

#2 | Posted by morris at 2026-07-29 11:48 AM | Reply

And "the Fourth Amendment protects citizens specifically against unreasonable government searches and seizures, rather than prohibiting all such actions."

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-07-29 11:54 AM | Reply

When stupidity becomes patriotic, critical thought becomes treason.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-07-29 11:55 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Nice catch.

I would definitely install this if I needed to cross any federal borders controlled by this administration.

I have nothing to hide but my "nothing" is protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. Even if I have to do the protecting myself.

#5 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-07-29 12:14 PM | Reply

I don't give a sheet what "they" pull... my phone data is not "property".... what a pantload....

#6 | Posted by South_American at 2026-07-31 02:43 AM | Reply

And "federal authorities had put Samuel Tunick on a terrorism watchlist."

Then how and why was Mr. Tunick allowed to board his flight from Georgia to the Dominican Republic in the first place if he was on the terrorism watchlist?

Airport security screeners in the Dominican Republic also let Samuel Tunick board his return flight to the US.

Why didn't TSA stop him as the law would require? Isn't TSA's mission to detect and deter terrorists (KSTs) from boarding flights?

#7 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-07-31 05:34 AM | Reply

5th Amendment, anyone?

#2 | Posted by morris at 2026-07-29 11:48 AM | Reply | Flag

Works just fine for Dr. Fauci.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-31 11:48 AM | Reply

5th Amendment, anyone?
#2 | Posted by morris at 2026-07-29 11:48 AM | Reply | Flag
Works just fine for Dr. Fauci.
#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

But it doesn't work at the border.
United States citizens are required to give the Untied States permission to search their phone to gain entry to the United States.
Alternately, citizens can surrender their phone to the United States.
Freedom!

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-31 11:51 AM | Reply

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-31 11:51 AM | Reply | Flag:

Years ago, they would've needed a search warrant signed by a judge and be specific about what they were looking for. Since The Patriot Act and NDAA, that went out of the window whenever they tag the word terrorism to virtually anything they want to investigate.

#10 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-31 12:03 PM | Reply

Okay so you can recognize we're more like the USSR every day.
But you're also okay with that, when it means the brown people get sent to camps.
Got it.

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-31 12:06 PM | Reply