"Just the amount of whining from Dems on a daily basis means the the cuts were productive."

You're wrong in two ways.

First, you have no evidence the cuts were productive.
You're simply lying about that.

Second, even if DOGE wasn't lying about savings, the savings aren't intended to be productive.
What did they produce?
Any savings from the cuts is already earmarked to be consumed by tax cuts.

DOGE cuts bring no net change in the debt or the deficit, both of which are still a trillion and thirty six trillion underwater, respectively.

You pick one and tell us why it's true.

"I pointed to the the site, you say they are lying because they are part of the Trump administration."

No, that's not why.

They're lying because they are misrepresenting what the actual cuts are.

It's like when Pam Bondi said Trump stopped fentanyl and in doing so saved 100 million lives.

The math doesn't add up.

"Do you want examples like GSA wasting $190 million a year in buildings we dont use and don't need? What else?"

You're gonna need a whole lot more than that!
$190 million is less than one dollar per American.

"$170 Billion so far."

DOGE promised to cut two trillion! That's less than ten percent of what you were promised.

The bigger problem, though, is the $170 billion in "cuts" does not take into account the costs simply being shifted over to taxpayers!

Fishpaw has a little more fight in him than the other dolts.

He really thinks the facts are in his side, and he genuinely tries to argue them!

Ok, pick one and tell us why it is a lie. If you can prove it is I'll accept it.
#14 | Posted by fishpaw

Okay. I'm pretty sure you're just a no good liar. But I'm giving you a chance to be a man of your word.

Do you accept this, or are you going to live up to my expectations?