Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, June 09, 2025

In a time in which politics has caused significant division, protests have become more common. Specifically, protests on overpasses. A group of those protesters have faced scrutiny in recent months, getting at least three visits from State Police. What has followed has been an argument over right to protest and where that protest can happen

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Among those protesters is Katherine Hinds, who has taken part in about 30 protests since President Donald Trump took office.

Hinds filed a formal complaint against State Police, stating that the same officer has visited the group three times and alleges the officer's "behavior was harassment and, we believe, a violation of our constitutional rights."

The Connecticut State Police has disagreed, replying officially to Hinds that the trooper was acting in accordance with the law and departmental procedures. No arrests have been made and no discipline has been issued.

"Based upon articulable facts and circumstances, (the trooper) had reasonable suspicion to believe that you were engaged in criminal trespass on state property," the response said.

Hinds and her fellow protesters have been seen on several overpasses in the New Haven region with signs that say things like, "go grads, save democracy," and "resistance is not futile."

"We've only once had the president's name on a sign," Hinds said. "Mostly they say things that are pretty generic about tariffs or tyranny. Different messages every time."

Hinds said three times so far, at the Cherry Hill Road bridge on I-95 in Branford, and the Howard Avenue bridge over I-95 in New Haven, the same trooper approached her group and requested identification. ....



#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-09 12:08 AM | Reply

@#1 ... "Based upon articulable facts and circumstances, (the trooper) had reasonable suspicion to believe that you were engaged in criminal trespass on state property," the [Connecticut State Police] response said. ...

OK, the overpass is state property, so there can be no politics on an overpass?


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-06-09 12:11 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort