'Orange Shape' Appears in Epstein Footage
A CBS investigation claims officials may have misled the public about a series of details on Jeffrey Epstein's final night alive.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
reinheitsgebot
Joined 2006/11/29Visited 2025/08/08
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Don Jr. Posts Photo of Pedo 47 Throwing Sex Toy (1 comments) ...
Confederate Memorial to Return to Arlington National Cemetery (10 comments) ...
JD Vance Ordered River Raised for Family Outing (9 comments) ...
Tulsi Garbage Declassified Documents Over CIA Objections (3 comments) ...
Nearly 2 Million Americans on Unemployment (5 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
A CBS News review raises questions about footage of Jeffrey Epstein's jail cell and what officials claim it shows.[image or embed] -- CBS News (@cbsnews.com) Jul 29, 2025 at 4:00 PM
A CBS News review raises questions about footage of Jeffrey Epstein's jail cell and what officials claim it shows.[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Did stinky smother Epstein with his diaper?
#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-07-31 01:20 AM | Reply | Funny: 1
By the by, that is what is known as a "headline triumph." Kudos!
#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-07-31 06:01 AM | Reply
Mysterious orange blob? We all knew Trump killed him but I didn't think he'd do it personally.
#3 | Posted by qcp at 2025-07-31 03:05 PM | Reply | Funny: 3
We all knew Trump killed him but I didn't think he'd do it personally.
#3 | POSTED BY QCP
It's plausible to think that he wanted to watch.
#4 | Posted by Zed at 2025-07-31 03:14 PM | Reply
This is true.
#5 | Posted by qcp at 2025-07-31 03:27 PM | Reply
Now I see why they didn't want to share the video.
Their security cameras are basically worthless. And they prove nothing either way.
The video doesn't even show Epstein's cell door.
He could have been killed several times that night because the cameras were not able to detect monitor or determine anything.
In addition the meta data shows there is clear evidence that that they were edited for whatever reason.
#6 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-08-01 09:19 PM | Reply
Can anybody REALLY blame Epstein for committing suicide (if that was the case)?
Whatever he had left of his life was going to turn into living Hell in prison. In fact, the worst kind of living Hell you can imagine.
I've heard tell that even the most hardened criminals in the prison population would treat those of Epstein's ilk like vermin or worse . . . maybe give him a taste of his own medicine.
#7 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-08-03 07:23 AM | Reply
#7 | Posted by Twinpac
His son said that his father was looking forward to fighting for his freedom. I mean, he's pretty much slipped this noose (no pun intended) before.
No, I think that the man was murdered. That people think this has reached Trump, who is flipping out that people think he did it.
He's the perfect, most logical suspect. I think that the full Epstein files will make his motivations for murder very evident.
#8 | Posted by Zed at 2025-08-03 08:57 AM | Reply
My belief this was murder increases each day. I'm pretty much convinced at this point. For instance:
"Metadata embedded in the video and analyzed by WIRED and independent video forensics experts shows that rather than being a direct export from the prison's surveillance system, the footage was modified, likely using the professional editing tool Adobe Premiere Pro. The file appears to have been assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ's website, where it was presented as "raw" footage."
We know the video is not 'raw' video. We know the excuse Bondi gave was a lie.
"It looks suspicious"but not as suspicious as the DOJ refusing to answer basic questions about it."
www.wired.com
#9 | Posted by YAV at 2025-08-03 09:14 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
ZED and YAV
Actually, I agree with both of you. If ever anyone had a motive and the means to eliminate a live witness who was in a position to bargain for a deal that would bring down the final curtain on Donald Trump, the order almost certainly came from the person who had the most to gain.
I just wish there was more evidence that would hold up in court.
#10 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-08-03 10:02 PM | Reply
I've heard tell that even the most hardened criminals in the prison population would treat those of Epstein's ilk like vermin or worse . . . maybe give him a taste of his own medicine. #7 | Posted by Twinpac
Epstein was an entrepreneur, responding to market demands. Big enough market for him to buy his own island.
He's a pimp, and a player. He does not fit easily into the predator trope.
Think of it more like he runs a petting zoo.
#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-08-03 10:28 PM | Reply
SNOOFY
"Think of it more like he runs a petting zoo."
(LOL) Offer yourself to Trump's defense team. I think you've got a winner there.
Seriously, do it. Trust me. A jury would eat that stuff up. Honestly. I'd swear on a stack of Trump's bibles.
#12 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-08-03 11:58 PM | Reply
@#11 ... Think of it more like he runs a petting zoo. ...
While you may seem to be OK to trivialize the damage done to Mr Epstein's victims, I am of a differing opinion.
One of the victims committed suicide this year because of the abuse she suffered.
Mr Epstein and Ms Maxwell committed horrific crimes upon hundreds? of children.
Children.
Please do not make light of that crime.
#13 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-04 12:19 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
More like a thousand, but your point stands.
#14 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-08-04 12:22 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
And, how does the transfer of Ms Maxwell to an apparently low-security white-collar crime prison after talking for hours with Pres Trump's personal attorney (who now seems to be the Deputy AG) look?
Mr Blanche, during the confirmation hearings, seemed to indicate that he could not give up his attorney privilege with Pres Trump should he gain the appointment.
So that leads me to ask, when Mr Blanche spent hours talking with Ms Maxwell, was he speaking for the American people, as a Deputy AG should do, or was he speaking as a defense lawyer of Pres Trump? The answers he gave during his confirmation hearing aise doubts in my mind.
Of course, that question ignores a critical issue here ...
Why was the Deputy AG of the US, who did not know the dteails of the case, even conducting these two interviews?
#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-04 12:59 AM | Reply
@#15
aise
- should be -
raise
Oops. :)
#16 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-08-04 01:01 AM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy