Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, December 15, 2025

In a complaint filed on Monday evening, Trump sought $5bn in damages each on two counts: alleging that the BBC defamed him, and that violated Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, when it broadcast an edited version of his Jan 6, 2021 speech.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

What a fat ------- -----.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-12-15 11:22 PM | Reply

What does your neighbor's pet (probably the only ----- you've ever seen) have to do with it?

#2 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-12-15 11:33 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

You can't defame a pig.

I'm really tired of Trump abusing our court system to harass people.

#3 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-12-16 12:02 AM | Reply

abusing our court system to harass people.

I believe the term is "Lawfare". It used to be bad, but those were (D)ifferent times.

#4 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-12-16 12:12 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

More Kabuki Theater from Trumpy.

I would hope that the BBC stands firm and make Trumpy prove his outlandish and frivolous claims. In court. Under oath. The story wasn't even broadcast in America! How could it have affected the election that Trumpy actually won? Good luck proving that nonsense. He only even heard about because they apologized for any mistakes.

Not a lawyer but ain't that also opening up Trumpy to discovery requests?

Meaning that the BBC can demand documents, communications, and testimony about his claims and damages, potentially revealing more about his finances and conduct, similar to other cases but with unique aspects given his public role and previous gag orders and frivolous demands in other lawsuits.

Gonna need more popcorn soon.

#5 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-12-16 10:43 AM | Reply

"Not a lawyer but ain't that also opening up Trumpy to discovery requests?"

They would likely be limited the specifics of the lawsuit allegation, which has to do with two comments that he made about an hour apart being spliced together to give the impression that he something he didn't actually say in that specific speech.

#6 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-12-16 10:51 AM | Reply

^^^ Edit

"Not a lawyer but ain't that also opening up Trumpy to discovery requests?"

They would likely be limited the specifics of the lawsuit allegation, which has to do with two comments that he made about an hour apart being spliced together to give the impression that he *said something he didn't actually say in that specific speech.

#7 | Posted by sentinel at 2025-12-16 10:52 AM | Reply

Fuck off Nazi dumbass.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-12-16 03:59 PM | Reply

Dummkopf Trumpf has yet to pay for his losing his lawsuit in the UK over the Steele Dossier: www.dailymail.co.uk

#9 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-16 04:05 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort