Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, December 27, 2025

WASHINGTON, Dec 26 (Reuters) - Moscow is likely stationing new nuclear-capable hypersonic ballistic missiles at a former airbase in eastern Belarus, a development that could bolster Russia's ability to deliver missiles across Europe, two U.S. researchers have found by studying satellite imagery.

The researchers' assessment broadly aligns with U.S. intelligence findings, said a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share information not authorized for public release.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Russia looks to be getting quite more aggressive towards Europe.


After Ukraine, what country is next?

My guess ... Poland.


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-27 10:10 PM | Reply

"Russian President Vladimir Putin has made clear his intention to place intermediate-range Oreshnik missiles, with an estimated range of up to 3,400 miles (5,500 km), in Belarus, but the exact location has not been previously reported.

Deployment of the Oreshnik would underscore the Kremlin's growing reliance on the threat of nuclear weapons as it seeks to deter NATO members from supplying Kyiv with weapons that can strike deep inside Russia, some experts said."

;;

Obligatory:

www.youtube.com

#2 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-27 10:13 PM | Reply

@#2 ... as it seeks to deter NATO members from supplying Kyiv with weapons that can strike deep inside Russia, some experts said ...

At this point, I think it is most appropriate to reiterate that ...

Pres Putin did an unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country.

When Russia talks about "defense" it seems almost to be laughable.

Russia is the country doing the invasion.


#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-27 10:19 PM | Reply

NUKE FUCKING MOSCOW

#4 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-12-27 10:23 PM | Reply

a development that could bolster Russia's ability to deliver missiles across Europe

Really? With a 3,400 mile range it can already hit London, Tel Aviv and Lisbon from Moscow.

Moving it 180 miles closer is going to make a difference?

#5 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-12-27 10:37 PM | Reply

@#5

You noticed that also.

imo, this seems to be more of a negotiating tactic than anything else.


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-27 10:41 PM | Reply

"Moscow tested a conventionally armed Oreshnik " Russian for Hazel tree - against a target in Ukraine in November 2024. Putin boasts that it's impossible to intercept because of velocities reportedly exceeding Mach 10.

Putin plans to deploy the weapon "in Belarus to extend its range further into Europe," said John Foreman, an expert with the Chatham House who served as a British defense attache in Moscow and Kyiv.

Foreman said he also sees such a move as a reaction to the planned stationing in Germany next year by the U.S. of conventional missiles that include the intermediate-range hypersonic Dark Eagle.

The Oreshnik's deployment would come with only weeks left before the expiration of 2010 New START pact, the last U.S.-Russia treaty limiting deployments of strategic nuclear weapons by the world's biggest nuclear powers."

Sounds like it has more to do with velocity than range?

Quicker the better is what Mrs BJ always says!

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-27 10:44 PM | Reply

Sounds like it has more to do with velocity than range?

I kinda doubt it. I'd imagine it hits with the same velocity regardless of range.

This is kind of like the US moving an ICBM from Minot to Moosomin. What difference does it make?

#8 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-12-27 10:51 PM | Reply

@#7 ... "Moscow tested a conventionally armed Oreshnik " ...

... Moscow is likely stationing new nuclear-capable hypersonic ballistic missiles ...

Is there a difference between "conventionally armed" and "nuclear-capable?"



#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-27 10:56 PM | Reply

Is there a difference between "conventionally armed" and "nuclear-capable?"

Probably nothing significant.

#10 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-12-27 11:02 PM | Reply

@#10 ... Probably nothing significant. ...

Physically, I do not disagree.

However, rhetorically, a big difference.

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-28 12:02 AM | Reply

However, rhetorically, a big difference.

And paperwork. Never forget the paperwork. "Nuclear Capable" would add many chapters.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-12-28 12:05 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort