US takes on European industrial censorship complex

I don't think travel bans is the right way to approach this bit this is definitely a fight that needs to happen.

" Europe is freer than we are"

Not as it pertains to speech.

" Does Donald Trump go after others with the full force of the US government for saying things he does not like?"

Do you have any examples?

No, I'm making it all up.

Disingenuous idiot.

#9 | POSTED BY ZED AT 2025-12-30 06:32 PM | FLAG: "

Then provide an example or two.

I'm not even necessarily saying you are wrong. I just not aware of what you are claiming.

#16. That does validate Zed's comment. Thank you for sharing.

" His posts read like his "varied" sources are NRO, Redstate, and the Daily Stormer.

#23 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-12-30 10:01 PM | FLAG: "

I don't go to Redstate or Daily Stormer. I certainly read a lot of what gets posted here. NRO is very critical of Trump. I also read what gets posted at NRO.

I meant to say I also read what gets posted at Realclearpolitics.

According to Danforth, this is a pro Trump puff piece:

" President Donald Trump played fast and loose with the presidential pardon power in 2025 " granting clemency to convicted fraudsters, drug traffickers, supporters convicted of assaulting police officers, and other individuals convicted of serious crimes."

www.nationalreview.com

As is this:

" IN JULY . . . The president of the United States settles a $10 billion nuisance lawsuit against CBS News; his claim was "60 Minutes edits its interviews and doesn't like me," which was probably not going to hold up in court as a cause of action, but was absolutely going to hold up the corporate merger of CBS's parent company Paramount so long as Trump was president".
" IN AUGUST . . . President Trump, tired of seeing unpleasant numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, fires its commissioner for reporting statistics that make him look like a chump"

" www.nationalreview.com

And here is some more pro Trump fluff, according to Danforth.

" Trump Has No Authority to Categorize Fentanyl as a Weapon of Mass Destruction"

www.nationalreview.com

" Yet they didn't touch any of the 100+ instances ... so ... not really.

#29 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-12-30 10:25 PM | FLAG: "

I followed the parents protesting sexualized books for students, Covid school closures and I know some of them got loud. I also know Biden' handlers took what was a local LE issue and put the FBI on it with an obvious attempt to intimidate any and all parents who were speaking out.

" But wow ... one non-fluff a month!"

Now you're being obtuse.

This is a 3 page document breaking down how domestic terrorism is defined and categorized:

www.fbi.gov

" Now you're pretending you weren't posting outliers.

#37 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-12-30 10:55 PM | FLAG: "

They cover a wide range of issues. It's not 100% about Trump. Not even close.

An article about the Minnesota fraud scandal is not a Trump puff piece.

We'll add Trump puff piece to the list of terms you don't understand.

First, you said this:

" with "varied" news sources, all of whom have NEVER aired anything but pro-Trump fluff.

#24 | POSTED BY DANFORTH AT 2025-12-30 10:05 PM | FLAG: "

Then I provided evidence to the contrary. So you moved the goalposts to "outlier" and then said this:

" one non-fluff a month!"

The first two links I provided were published at NRO today. The other was on December 20. 3 in 10 days is far different than 1 per month. They've also posted other pieces critical of Trump this month.

" Your list, since Trump has nothing to do with the story, until now, when he's withholding money for hungry children.

But the article didn't cover that part, did it?"

It's because the story about Trump freezing funds broke after that piece was published at NRO. That piece was published this morning. The freezing funds story broke this evening.

Seriously, ditch the shovel.
"

" Did you read the part where it almost used my same wording?"

Yes, it was toward the end of page 2.