Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Thursday, January 22, 2026

President Donald Trump's retreat from threats of force as an option for acquiring Greenland capped weeks of policy chaos, as top aides scrambled both to accommodate the president's demands and ease the panic they caused among U.S. allies, according to two sources with knowledge of the conversations.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... In remarks on Wednesday at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Trump ruled out using military force after weeks of refusing to do so, and in a social media post said he would no longer be imposing tariffs that he had threatened to put into effect on February 1.

White House officials had pushed a less provocative approach, with several key members of the president's team unenthusiastic about possibly using military force to seize the Danish territory, the two White House sources said. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

After saying on Wednesday that tariffs are off the table, Trump said he and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte had "formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic Region" during talks in Davos. He tasked top officials with negotiating a potential deal. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-22 02:13 PM | Reply

Another view ...

Trump steps back from the brink on Greenland. But the damage has been done.
www.politico.com

... After two weeks of escalating threats toward Europe, President Donald Trump blinked on Wednesday, backing away from the unthinkable brink of a potential war against a NATO ally during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Trump's vow not to use military force to seize Greenland from Denmark eased European fears about a worst-case scenario and prompted a rebound on Wall Street. And his declaration hours later after meeting with NATO's leader that he may back off of his tariff threat having secured the "framework" of an agreement over Greenland continued a day of backpedaling on one of the most daring gambits of his presidency to date.

But his continued heckling of allies as "ungrateful" for not simply giving the U.S. "ownership and title" of what he said was just "a piece of ice" did little to reverse a deepening sentiment among NATO leaders and other longtime allies that they can no longer consider the United States " for 80 years the linchpin of the transatlantic alliance -- a reliable ally.

"The takeaway for Europe is that standing up to him can work. There is relief, of course, that he's taking military force off the table, but there is also an awareness that he could reverse himself," said a European official who attended Trump's speech and, like others interviewed for this report, was granted anonymity to speak candidly. "Trump's promises and statements are unreliable but his scorn for Europe is consistent. We will have to continue to show resolve and more independence because we can no longer cling to this illusion that America is still what we thought it was." ...



#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-22 02:15 PM | Reply

25A that rancid pile of s*&^ already.

If you find yourself having to placate your boss on one hand while undercutting him on the other, you have a problem.

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2026-01-22 02:23 PM | Reply

1) Trump said he and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte had "formed the framework of a future deal...

2) He tasked top officials with negotiating a potential deal.

Does this future/potential deal come before or after the concept of a health care plan? Is Jarvanka one of the "top officials" again?

Are they still eating the pets?

#4 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-01-22 02:27 PM | Reply

@#4 ... Does this future/potential deal come before or after the concept of a health care plan? ...

Well, at least the imaginary health-care concept of a plan did not anger so many US allies.

And then there's Greenland's PM Nielsen who was not in the room when the concept of a framework of a deal was reached.

#5 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-22 03:17 PM | Reply

Greenland's PM Nielsen who was not in the room

Good indication of the value of the discussion. Lewzer was probably just shopping for some kind of gold NATO medal.

#6 | Posted by REDIAL at 2026-01-22 03:38 PM | Reply

Looks like Trumpy is not going to get Greenland.

And I am very happy about that.

I was not looking forward to going to Greenland to defend Greenlanders against American aggression. I'd much rather go to Canada and defend them ( they are much closer to me) so have at it Mr Wild Toad.

Trumpy will get what he is entitled to by treaty.

And if he doesn't negotiate a better treaty that's all he will get.

Welcome come to international diplomacy.

#7 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-22 03:43 PM | Reply

Donald Trump hasn't given up on Greenland.

He's crazy.

#8 | Posted by Zed at 2026-01-22 03:55 PM | Reply

He's crazy for sure.

But I don't think (I could be wrong) even the military will obey orders to attack a NATO country.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-22 04:01 PM | Reply

Trump never had the support to invade Greenland.

All the saber rattling was meant to distracted from the Epstein files

#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-01-22 04:05 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#7 ... Trumpy will get what he is entitled to by treaty. ...

There already is a treaty in place, since 1951, that allows the US to have military bases on Greenland. Indeed, during the Cold War, we had many military bases in Greenland.

Which is why I think #10 is spot-on ...

#11 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-01-22 04:11 PM | Reply

All the saber rattling was meant to distracted from the Epstein files

#10 | POSTED BY CLOWNSHACK

And to get more lenient treaty deals. Which they may or may not get now. And all they had to do was ask!

Yup! Next up in the Deflection Barrel from Pedo Protector Trumpy's illegal handling of the Epstein Files is Cuba.

Apparently.

#12 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-01-22 04:12 PM | Reply

Divestiture and potential divestiture might of had something to do with it.

#13 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-01-22 04:56 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort