Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Rep. Jamie Raskin claims he found a redacted quote from Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers that contradicts Trump's statements about kicking the disgraced financier out of Mar-a-Lago, according to his review of unredacted DOJ files

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Breaking MS NOW: Some of the Epstein docs the DOJ invited members of Congress to view are STILL redacted, despite promises otherwise. Raskin says DOJ's reading room has just four computers. It would take seven years to get through the files in the current conditions established by the DOJ.

[image or embed]

-- Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1.bsky.social) Feb 9, 2026 at 5:06 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

My understanding is that the DoJ provided four computers to allow the members of Congress to view the Epstein files.

Rep Raskin spent 9am to about 2pm examining the files in the DoJ provided facility. He reviewed less than 50 pages of the 3 million released.

Why is the Trump DoJ making this so difficult?


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 09:15 PM | Reply

Raskin said unredacted Epstein files indicate DOJ improperly shielded names
thehill.com

... Rep. Jamie Raskin (Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said after reviewing the unredacted Epstein files that the Justice Department (DOJ) appears to have flouted the law when concealing various names in documents.

Lawmakers on Monday were permitted for the first time to review the unredacted versions of all DOJ files related to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Several members of Congress had questioned whether the DOJ had fully complied with a law mandating the public release of the files, which allowed for only narrow redactions.

Raskin on Monday said that in addition to revealing the names of victims that were supposed to be shielded, the files released to the public appear to wrongly conceal those who spent time with Epstein "simply to spare them potential embarrassment, political sensitivity or disgrace of some kind."

"I was able to determine, at least I believe, that there were tons of completely unnecessary redactions in addition to the failure to redact the names of victims, and so that's troubling to us," Raskin said.

"There's no way you run a billion-dollar international child sex trafficking ring with just two people committing crimes, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. No way. It doesn't work like that. So we need to figure out what other conspiracies were involved, what other co-conspirators were involved? And I really do believe that listening to the survivors is going to be our pathway through this nightmare." ...

Raskin said there are just four computers available for lawmakers to review the roughly 3 million pages of documents that have been released. During the multiple hours he reviewed documents, Raskin estimated he reviewed 30 or 40 documents. ...



#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 09:17 PM | Reply

... The Epstein Files Congress sees but you don't. ...

Yeah, that is a good observation.

Why doesn't the Trump administration want the general public to see the files?



#3 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-09 09:20 PM | Reply

Why doesn't the Trump administration want the general public to see the files?

#3 | Posted by LampLighter

At least one little girl aged nine being abused?

A torture video?

The general public, to include half of MAGA, do not belong in the same culture as these degenerates.

#4 | Posted by Zed at 2026-02-10 08:09 AM | Reply

No administration wants unredacted records released.

Understandable reductions is one thing.

Since all three branches biased, the facts will never be known.

Nobody is trusted with these records. Can't even go outside the US for help as this case reaches far and wide.

The General Public is too squeamish to see the facts.

Sat for a jury and people just had to be dismissed as potential jurors because they just can't handle seeing or hearing evidence.

If they released this junk,they'll need disclaimers for the weak.

But, instead we'll be told it's too much for anyone. Anyone but the powers in charge.

#5 | Posted by Petrous at 2026-02-10 12:58 PM | Reply

"Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

"Trump is paraphrased and quoted as saying, 'No, Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of Mar-a-Lago, but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and no, we never asked him to leave,'" Raskin said in an interview at the Capitol."

www.axios.com

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-10 02:45 PM | Reply

SO it turns out that the "Unredacted Files" that the DOJ uploaded are actually... wait for it... Redacted Files from the FBI.

House Rep on the House Floor Names 6 of the wealthy pedos that the FBI missed:

www.youtube.com

"These men are Salvatore Nav'ora, Zorab
Mikolads, Leapig Leonor, Nicola Capuda,
Sultan Ahmed bin Sullyam, CEO of Dubai
Ports World, and billionaire businessman
Leslie Wexner, who was labeled as a
co-conspirator by the FBI."

;;

"Jeffrey Epstein paid $100mn to Victoria's Secret boss Les Wexner in 2008 after the retail billionaire claimed Epstein stole hundreds of millions of dollars from him, according to a report by US prosecutors.

The report said Wexner's lawyers told prosecutors about the payment from Epstein just days before the sex offender died while awaiting trial on child sex trafficking charges in 2019."

www.ft.com

#7 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-10 03:17 PM | Reply

(some of those named in #7 are incorrect spellings as they are from the audio transcript at the link)

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-10 03:38 PM | Reply

"House Rep on the House Floor Names 6 of the wealthy pedos that the FBI missed"

So Ro Khanna didn't mention Trump?
FULLY EXONERATED.
Suck it, libs!

#9 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-10 03:40 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

#9

Best DR Trumper impression ever?

MTG has an interview out today saying "Blame Trump!" not all his minions (who are of course also to blame)

www.youtube.com

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-10 03:56 PM | Reply

Anyone here remember that Washington Post article that came out about 7-8 years ago that directly tied Les Wexner to a brutal 1996 Epstein rape of an artist Lexner's compound in Ohio?

Oh, and there is also that mysterious murder of Arthur L. Shapiro 40 years ago that was never solved.

#11 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2026-02-10 03:58 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

"Anyone here remember that Washington Post article that came out about 7-8 years ago that directly tied Les Wexner to a brutal 1996 Epstein rape of an artist Lexner's compound in Ohio?"

I remember the rape being more gentle.
--JeffJ

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-10 04:00 PM | Reply

#11

Yep...

www.timesofisrael.com

www.yahoo.com

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2026-02-10 04:02 PM | Reply

Virginia Giuffre wrote that she flew to Paris (on her own dime) to testify against a French oligarch who abused her.

During the ten-hour deposition, Jean-Luc Brunel would sneakily and nastily whisper to her "You're a lying bitch" [sic].

This monster was later found dead in a French prison cell; he apparently hung himself like Jeffrey Epstein in MCC.

Link: www.bbc.com

#14 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-02-10 04:41 PM | Reply

"This monster was later found dead in a French prison cell; he apparently hung himself like Jeffrey Epstein in MCC."

One of the reasons these go unsolved is in the eyes of the police, it's not really any different than a dead hooker.

Police don't care about dead------------, or the dead child he raped.

#15 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-10 04:46 PM | Reply

Posted by Petrous?

Well that's quite a different take than yesterday!

Nothing stops one of them from lying on the Floor. They could read off every member of Congress and they'd be protected by the Speech and Debate clause.
Can't trust any name given and any name withheld.
Posted by Petrous
drudge.com

#16 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-02-10 07:40 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort