Kennedy Center Votes to Restore Trump's Name
Kennedy Center votes to restore Trump's name and close for 2 years, challenging a judge's order
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
Corky
Joined 2005/05/24Visited 2026/08/13
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Kennedy Center Votes to Restore Trump's Name (5 comments) ...
Trump Talks of ‘Beautiful Young Girls’ (7 comments) ...
Trump has Amassed Staggering Wealth in 'most openly corrupt' Presidency (13 comments) ...
Karoline Leavitt Resigning as White House Press Secretary (21 comments) ...
Western Weakness Is Encouraging Putin to Test NATO (21 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
August 13, 2026[image or embed] -- Heather Cox Richardson (TDPR) (@hcrichardson.bsky.social) 2:03 AM · Aug 14, 2026
August 13, 2026[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
... the board voted to add Trump's name to the building's facade ...
One report I read was that the name would be "etched" into the facade, so permanent.
Kennedy Center Board Votes to Inscribe Trump's Name on Building www.usnews.com
This act seems to be a blatant attempt to get around the wording of the Judge's order to remove Pres Trump's name.
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-14 12:05 AM | Reply
What reasoning does a Judge have to override the board of the foundation?
Just seems like Judicial overreach, and because you are against the renaming you're hoping for miss application of justice.
I don't care either way but your bias is really sad.
#2 | Posted by oneironaut at 2026-08-14 10:40 PM | Reply
It's a Trump Appointed Board, you dismal debutant.
And 'bias' against a known criminal in the WH? Since when is bias against evil a bad thing?
Perhaps in Corrupt Capitalist faux-Communist China you go used to such evil.
#3 | Posted by Corky at 2026-08-14 10:54 PM | Reply
Anyone that supports this is an ignorant idiot with no clue. The judges' order is crystal clear and only four pages.
www.courtlistener.com
#4 | Posted by et_al at 2026-08-15 12:41 AM | Reply
" What reasoning does a Judge have to override the board of the foundation?"
He laid it out in the decision. Basically, he pointed out even if Trustees aren't subject-experts, they're still required to do the basic fiduciary and managerial duties of Trustees. These folks didn't.
For the record, these are the same folks who sued an artist for the Breach of a Contract that never existed, and now are on the hook for over $250,000 in his legal fees.
It doesn't take Solomon to realize these hand-picked slurpers are morons.
#5 | Posted by Danforth at 2026-08-15 01:26 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy