Trump considers giving away part of Yosemite to private co.
The Trump administration is eyeing a land swap that would give part of Yosemite National Park to a private company, according to a document submitted to Congress.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
LampLighter
Joined 2013/04/13Visited 2026/08/30
Status: user
MORE STORIES
USDA cyclospora research projects shelved amid funding cuts (2 comments) ...
Court rules states can regulate prediction market platforms (3 comments) ...
Progs are learning the hard way how to survive Fox News (1 comments) ...
Trump considers giving away part of Yosemite to private co. (3 comments) ...
Trump admin cannot punish noncitizens for protected speech (2 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
More from the article ...
... In the document, obtained by The Hill, the National Park Service (NPS) states that a landowner is seeking to connect their property with a park service road in order to facilitate commercial development. The agency said it is "working with the landowner on a land exchange that will ... enable NPS to convey an interest in land." "This will require the landowner to purchase property inside the park or within other NPS units in California," the document continued. Separately, responses provided by the Interior Department to a Senate office that were shared with The Hill state that the land swap is a "priority." Asked about the proposed land swap, the Interior Department, which oversees the NPS, told The Hill that it had not made any final decisions. "If a proposal advances, the Department will follow established procedures to ensure appropriate coordination, transparency and public involvement consistent with federal law," it said in a statement. ...
The agency said it is "working with the landowner on a land exchange that will ... enable NPS to convey an interest in land."
"This will require the landowner to purchase property inside the park or within other NPS units in California," the document continued.
Separately, responses provided by the Interior Department to a Senate office that were shared with The Hill state that the land swap is a "priority."
Asked about the proposed land swap, the Interior Department, which oversees the NPS, told The Hill that it had not made any final decisions.
"If a proposal advances, the Department will follow established procedures to ensure appropriate coordination, transparency and public involvement consistent with federal law," it said in a statement. ...
#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-29 09:45 PM | Reply
@#1 ... "If a proposal advances, the Department will follow established procedures to ensure appropriate coordination, transparency and public involvement consistent with federal law," it said in a statement. ...
Consistent with federal law?
Like getting Congressional approval before the vandalism of the East Wing of the White House?
Like getting Congressional approval before renaming The Kennedy Center?
Like ...
#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-08-29 09:49 PM | Reply
How can you explain that Trump is puke to a MAGA that enjoys vomit?
#3 | Posted by Zed at 2026-08-30 07:25 AM | Reply
Post a comment The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed. Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it. Username: Password: Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy