"this tool has been predicting a civil war for the last 20 years."

He sees it as his Days of Glory.

Day One: kill every liberal who ever disagreed with him ... including folks like my wife and I.

Day Two: Fragged by his own men, since he resembled "the enemy".

"Just make it a popular vote."

Remember Florida in 2000?

A close election would unleash 100,000 Floridas, since victory might be found in ANY hamlet.

Might as well call it what it is: The Lawyer's Full Employment Act.

"I listen to them and (the progressives) have no actual solutions."

You listened?!?

Via what sources?

"Looks like we've struck a nerve."

Rank stupidity always gets that reaction from me.

"you're just as much of a bigot as those who described same-sex couples as "play acting""

That's a lie.

I was at the forefront of the equality movement, always pointing out my wife and I got over 14,000 protections and advantages the moment we said "I do", while gays were being treated as second-class citizens.

Why lie???

For example, I'll give you the easiest issues of all.

Husband has been with wife #one for 30 years, wife, #two for 20 years, wife #three for 10 years, and now is marrying a fourth time.

What proportion of rights does the fourth wife get upon marriage? Full rights, or a proportion based on length of marriage?

Next question: how do you break up one man's Social Security benefit with four widows?

"You're entitled to your opinions, but you can't hide the fact that you're just as much of a bigot"

GFY.

Same-sex marriage fits like a glove inside current marriage rules, since the rights and issues are exactly the same.

Meanwhile, poly marriages would have to have an entirely new canon of laws written, all based on PROPORTIONAL rights.

Supporters are willing to flap their gums, but NO ONE has even proposed the first law. I'm all for extending the rights; now let's see some legwork instead of just lip service.

"The Electoral College can't be eliminated soon enough."

Why would voters in small states vote to become irrelevant?!?

They'd immediately become flyovers. Why campaign in NH or VT if you can just run up the totals in CA?

" Lefties FINALLY found wasteful government spending to oppose."

Extending tax cuts while running deficit budgets is wasteful government spending. Lefties have been against the additional borrowing you voted for.

"Communists"

What's the definition of that word in Bellringer's Dictionary?

Because I don't believe that word means what you think it means.

" Trump needs to ram through his nominees immediately."

If Mitch McConnell could talk, he'd demand we wait until the new Congress is seated, because decisions like those should be decided by the electorate.

/s

If the House was 218-220, a few members of a small caucus might yield outsized power.

5-6 people in a 70-seat majority means they're relegated to "that group in the corner over there".

" will be a ridiculous step towards alienating smaller states in an already divided country."

That's why it'll never pass: it requires smaller states to relinquish power they currently have.

Too many Constitutional Scholars in those smaller states for that to happen.

"Stephen Miller"

The bastard child of Roy Cohn and Hitler.

" I only know of one politician that has advocated government ownership of companies and that is Pedo47"

COMMUNIST!!!

" Fox News suffers ratings drop on bleak election night for Republicans"

Odd.

I watched Fox all night.

It was almost as much fun as when Karl Rove melted down over Ohio being called for Obama.

"I've got more examples for Socialism..."

Once in power??? No, you don't.

"Republican does not refer to a party, it refers to the composition of government"

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

And "Nazi" refers to someone with severe optical problems.

Meanwhile, can you name a single action of Socialism, once in power, from our little German friend with the silly mustache?

Because I've got a few million examples of dictatorship and fascism once in power.

"why ignore the possibility people can love and be devoted to multiple partners?"

I'm not. The law is merely pointing out marriage, at its legal root, is the conference of SUPERSEDING RIGHTS to ONE person.

For multiple marriage partners, a whole new canon of laws would have to be written.

To date, legally, it's ONE spouse (the first), and some play-actors. The third "wife", for example, isn't really a wife, and has ZERO legal marital rights and protections.

This is so "unrelated" people can live together. The tax laws, as usual, will recognize the first spouse, and allow for as much play-acting folks want.

"Why do you ignore 50% of Hitler's chosen title?"

For the same reason I don't believe Saddam's Republican Guard were Republicans.

"If the next two years allows the DSA to run rampant, 2028 will be up for grabs again."

What part of a 50-seat majority don't you understand?

The margins are large enough no small caucus can control it.

FFS, doesn't anybody understand how Congress operates?!?

"Angie Nixon, a DSA member, came within 3 points of her Republican opponent in Florida."

Again, a one or two seat majority is a world of difference compared to a 50-seat majority.

"as far as I can tell, none of them are socialist either."

Why are you ignoring 50% of their chosen title?

"What they do. Without a doubt."

Odd. The German guy with the funny mustache never ruled a single day as a Socialist. Instead, he jailed or murdered the leading Socialists.

But that name was in the Party ... so they could trick others to get power. Once in charge ... dictatorship.