Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News

Drudge Retort

User Info

tonyroma

Subscribe to tonyroma's blog Subscribe

Menu

Special Features

Monday, September 23, 2024

Steve Benen - A few months ago, Politico published a report with a memorable headline: "Trump keeps flip-flopping his policy positions after meeting with rich people." The relevance of the headline lingers for a reason. read more


Sunday, September 22, 2024

David French: While I'm interested in Mark Robinson's potential impact on the presidential race in North Carolina, I'm also concerned with the ongoing impact of MAGA on the heart of the Republican Party. In nine years, countless Republican primary voters have moved from voting for Trump in spite of his transgressions to rejecting anyone who doesn't transgress. If you're not transgressive, you're suspicious. Decency is countercultural in the Republican Party. read more


Caitlin Dickerson: A growing number of Americans are pointing to immigration as a top concern heading into the election. But a substantive debate on the issue has become impossible, given that Donald Trump and his vice-presidential candidate, J. D. Vance, are only escalating their use of outright lies and xenophobia in lieu of anything resembling fact-based policy solutions. read more


In June 2015, former President Donald Trump infamously came down a golden escalator and declared himself the man who couldn't be bought. Now, almost a decade later, he is running as a candidate who is openly for sale. He has said he'll offer plum jobs to major donors like Elon Musk, promised favors to oil executives, bragged to the wealthy about the tax cuts he can deliver and has even taken time away from his campaign to pitch a cryptocurrency project for his sons. read more


Saturday, September 21, 2024

Maya Berry came to testify as an expert on hate crimes. Instead, Berry, the executive director of the Arab American Institute, a national nonpartisan civil rights advocacy organization, was subjected to some of the most offensive and bigoted attacks by Republican senators the committee has seen in recent years. read more


Comments

#11

As usual, totally false on a number of fronts.

Temporary Protected Status, as the program is known, is given to qualifying individuals allowing them to remain in the country because conditions are considered unsafe in their home countries. The authorizations are temporary but can be renewed repeatedly as long as recipients stay in good standing and their prior homes are still considered unsafe.

Haitian nationals were first eligible for the status in 2010 when an earthquake destroyed much of the country's infrastructure.

The growth of the Haitian population in Springfield comes from actions undertaken by local officials. Springfield, which had shrunk in population for several decades, needed workers. Those opportunities, a relatively low cost of living and support from the community played big roles in drawing Haitians to the city, according to a 2023 Dayton Daily New article examining Springfield's growing Haitian population.

The city began pitching itself after 2014 to potential employers as a good place for new factories and distribution hubs, and several new companies opened facilities there by the end of the 2010s, the New York Times reported. A lack of workers opened the door for Haitian immigrants to work, and word of mouth helped rapidly draw more to the city, experts told the Times for that story.

It's the height of idoicy for dingbats to keep insinuating that Harris personally can be tied to Springfield in her role as VP. Anyone ever seen Mike Pence be blamed for Trump's Muslim ban, or his anti-immigrant rhetoric of not-even veiled racism and prejudice?

Springfield is responsible for the influx of immigrants into their community, though responsibility lies with governments at all levels to meet the needs of its citizens. I wonder if JD Vance advocated for federal assistance instead of demonizing immigrants only there to provide their labor in support of local businesses, how much better the city and its immediate outlook might be. But trying to turn people against each other is all Trump/Vance offers to this nation while morons like Visitor happily tote their polluted water, drinking the poison and regurgitating its toxicity wrapped up tightly in their own ignorance.

Trump supported banning TikTok, only to reverse course after chatting with Jeff Yass, a billionaire hedge fund manager - and prospective campaign donor - who has a multibillion-dollar stake in ByteDance, TikTok's parent corporation. Something similar appears to have happened with the cryptocurrency industry.

Trump also started hedging on some of his immigration policies around the time he met with wealthy corporate executives at a Business Roundtable meeting.

A few months earlier, Trump publicly suggested that conservatives should give up on their opposition to Anheuser-Busch shortly before he attended a fundraiser hosted by an Anheuser-Busch lobbyist.

Perhaps most importantly, Trump abandoned his long-time skepticism about cryptocurrencies after having some chats with prospective donors at Mar-a-Lago.

Former president Donald Trump offered enthusiastic support for vaping on Friday, promising to protect the industry following a private meeting earlier in the day with a leading vaping lobbyist. Trump wrote on Truth Social, his social media platform, that he "saved Flavored Vaping in 2019" and would "save Vaping again!"

Of particular interest was the process through which Trump changed his mind. Trump's new position "is consistent with the recent financial support he has received from the tobacco industry." It also came "just after a meeting with the head of the Vapor Technology Association, which describes itself as the leading vaping trade association, representing more than 100 members of the industry."

Trump isn't saying, "I'll change my position in exchange for money," he's instead effectively saying, "Since I don't care about governing or public policy anyway, I'll just align my beliefs with the preferences of wealthy people and prospective donors who have my ear behind closed doors."

Isn't it interesting that our resident Trumphumpers keep complaining that Kamala Harrris hasn't explained why she's changed positions on certain issues that she articulated years and years ago, yet not a single one has asked why Trump so brazenly flip-flops when wealthy interests grab his ear behind closed doors?

On the campaign trail, Trump has said that immigrants are "animals" and "not human," and implied that millions are crossing the border each month; publicly available data show that the real number has never exceeded 200,000 a month this year. When Vance took to X to declare that Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, were eating their neighbors' pets, and Trump repeated the lie in a nationally televised debate the next day, those of us who have studied the United States' history of dehumanizing immigrants felt as if the clock had turned back 150 years, to when the same specious claim was used to justify vigilante violence against Chinese Americans, and laws including the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Trump and Vance's claims, along with other copycat assertions meant to imply that nonwhite immigrants are inherently immoral, such as the one about "Haitian prostitutes" aired at a Springfield city-commission meeting, have surfaced throughout American history. This summer, a survey ... found that nearly a quarter of Americans now believe that immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our country" and that "many immigrants are terrorists." More than a third of respondents said that "millions of undocumented immigrants illegally cast votes in our elections."

American voters have consistently indicated that they want order at the southern border, yet many economists agree that the large amount of immigration the U.S. experienced in recent years is a major reason the economy bounced back from the COVID-related downturn faster than that of any other nation in the world[EM]. This complex picture of immigration and its implications calls for the hard work of policy making and statesmanship. Again and again, misinformation and fearmongering have only made things worse.

This has changed the composition of the party. While many decent people remain - and represent the hope for future reform - Trump's Republican Party has become a magnet for eccentrics and conspiracy theorists of all stripes.

Indeed, Trump in his diabolical shrewdness knows how to build and maintain his own base. He's shed the Republican Party's traditional commitment to life. He'll sprint away from any policy or principle that he believes might cost him power. At the same time, he watches his crowd roar when he demonizes immigrants (MAGA's true north star) and he sees "red-pilled" young men rally to his side when he punches hard and never backs down.

Leaders don't simply enact policies; they dictate the cultures of the institutions they lead. We've all experienced this phenomenon in our workplaces, churches and schools. I've compared the cultural power of a leader to setting the course of a river. Defying or contradicting the leader's ethos is like swimming against the current - yes, you can do that for a time, but eventually you get exhausted and either have to swim to the bank and leave, or you're swept downstream, just like everyone else.

Trump has set the course of the Republican Party's cultural river for more than nine years. Fewer and fewer resisters remain, and they're growing increasingly exhausted and besieged.

My only question is why haven't more non-irrational, non-conspiracy-aligned Republicans not stopped supporting Trump? Are they really completely blind to who he is, was, and always will be - which is someone antithetical to traditional Republican values, especially respect and fealty to the Rule of Law as they support a felon openly subverting said laws solely for his own personal benefit, never for anything having to do with bettering the country?

"He just thinks he operates in his own world," Fred Wertheimer, a veteran of decades of fights over campaign finance and government ethics, told HuffPost. "What he's doing is incredibly brazen in both asking for large amounts of money and telling people what he's going to do for them in return."

"Bottom line, I've never seen anyone do what he's doing," Wertheimer said.

"He has and always will be a con man who's really only looking out for himself and whatever helps him to obtain power," said Tiffany Mueller, the president of the Democratic campaign finance group End Citizens United. "All his promises went out the window. Instead of draining the swamp, he brought the swamp to him and his properties and cashed in."

Elon Musk and other wealthy conservatives are funding America PAC, which is focused on turning out GOP voters in swing states. Trump's official super PAC, MAGA, Inc. is airing attack ads targeting Harris with more than $100 million from Timothy Mellon, a somewhat reclusive banking heir with far-right politics. And Miriam Adelson, the widow of gambling magnate Sheldon Adelson, is pouring tens of millions into Preserve America, another super PAC targeting Harris with attack ads.

[I]n public, Harris has not been nearly as obsequious to large donors, save for a decision to trim back a Biden proposal to increase taxes on capital gains. Donors, for instance, have openly pushed for Harris to fire Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan if she's elected president. But Democrats close to Harris have suggested such a push has only made it less likely that Harris will oust Khan, a progressive who has chilled mergers and acquisitions with an aggressive approach to antitrust.

Trump is simply being what he's always been: A life-long grifter moving from one con and mark to the next in the never-ending quest to keep the illusion of him as a successful businessman from crashing under the weight of the oppressive debt he has to manipulate in order to keep the fantasy alive.

#16

That's rapidly changing ...... due to the popularity of CC and the other rookies this season who're changing the game in the ticket revenue department as well.

Caitlin Clark Playoff Tickets Cost More Than Entire WNBA Finals

On Friday, TickPick (an online marketplace for buying and selling tickets to live events like concerts, sports, and theater) made an X post that wrote, "$131: Total cost to attend every game of the 2023 WNBA Finals

$133: Cheapest ticket available to see Fever at Sun in the First Rd of 2024 WNBA Playoffs".

In other words, fans are willing to pay more money to see Caitlin Clark's first playoff game than they were to watch all four WNBA Finals games between the Las Vegas Aces and New York Liberty in 2023.

Another example is that prior to this season, you could get a $5 ticket to Indiana Fever games regardless of opponent. This season the cheapest ticket was $50 and the Fever averaged over 17,000 fans per home game, far higher than the Eastern Conference finalist Indiana Pacers did last year. Of the Fever's 20 home games only 2 weren't complete sellouts and every single road game was sold out.

And there's this:

Fever's Caitlin Clark drives record WNBA betting action

Along with record television and attendance records, the WNBA's star-studded rookie class helped drive record sports betting action for the 2024 regular season. BetMGM reported a 108 percent increase in WNBA betting this season, with two times as many women engaging in betting on the league.

Indiana's star rookie Caitlin Clark was again at the forefront of the increased interest, with six of the top eight most-bet games at the book involving the Fever. Five times as many prop bets were placed on Clark than the next most-bet player - fellow rookie Angel Reese of the Chicago Sky.

People are choosing the W and CC with the eyes and wallets all over America and the world.

#86

Following the debate, CNN's Daniel Dale reported Trump made at least 33 false claims during the debate, compared with one from Harris.

"This was a staggeringly dishonest debate performance from Trump. Just lie after lie on subject after subject," Dale said.

In fairness, Politifact goes into much more detail about every disputed statement or comment, finding Harris was misleading or false in statements, but that was because she said something like "Trump had the worst deficits" when in fact George W. Bush actually had worst at the end of his Administration. Trump's lies mostly had no validity at all, especially the ones he was verbally fact-checked on in real time.

Harris did not offer any patently false comments in the volume or manner Trump did.

Drudge Retort
 

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable