Thursday, June 20, 2024

Stone Caught on Tape Discussing Plan to Challenge Election

Self-proclaimed "dirty trickster" Roger Stone was secretly videotaped at Mar-a-Lago during a remarkably candid conversation.

Posted by qcp at 09:33 AM | 25 COMMENTS | permalink

More

Comments

This slant head belongs in jail.

#1 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-06-19 09:26 AM

Is it my imagination, or is MAGA increasingly behaving as if they will lose 2024?

#2 | Posted by Zed at 2024-06-19 09:29 AM

#1
Related to Stone but veering a bit off topic. I write of that slope. Is there a name for it or is it one of those curious things that, well, just kinda happens? Did his parents strap him to a cradle board in order to accomplish cranial deformation? Perhaps the rasty egg from which he hatched overheated. I dunno, but I sure am curious.

#3 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-06-19 09:39 AM

"Plan to Win Election Relies on Judges and Courts"

So the JeffJ's of the world can say

"Sorry liberals, but this was all perfectly legal!"

See Also: 1933.

#4 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-06-19 10:04 AM

That man, in any decent Republic,
would be behind bars, or swinging from
a gallows. But NOT in the GOP controlled
Dumb'merica!

#5 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-06-20 11:28 AM

Florida is known as a two-party consent state. This means that, under state law, all parties involved in private conversations must consent to that conversation being recorded.

#6 | Posted by look_inward at 2024-06-20 11:32 AM

Florida is known as a two-party consent state. This means that, under state law, all parties involved in private conversations must consent to that conversation being recorded.

#6 | Posted by look_inward

So what? Do you have an opinion on trump's team already planning to overthrow democracy?

#7 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2024-06-20 12:14 PM

Florida is known as a two-party consent state. This means that, under state law, all parties involved in private conversations must consent to that conversation being recorded.

#6 | POSTED BY LOOK_INWARD

Bless your stupid heart.

No sweetie, that applies to TELEPHONE conversations. NOT public speeches or public conversations.

#8 | Posted by Sycophant at 2024-06-20 12:30 PM

the supreme court still hasn't decided on presidential immunity...biden should have stone arrested and charged with conspiracy to subvert a federal election.

#9 | Posted by brerrabbit at 2024-06-20 12:37 PM

biden should have stone arrested and charged with conspiracy to subvert a federal election.

Biden? He's gonna wanna slow hug Roger Stone and play with his hair while singing Kumbaya and dancing in a room filled with paper Mch hearts he and Jill made.

Biden is too soft, and not just in the head.

Yet, he's still a vast improvement over Trump.

What a sad state of affairs we find ourselves in.

#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-06-20 12:47 PM

Papier-mache*

Fancy pants letters were dropped for the post.

#11 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-06-20 12:48 PM

Roger Stone reminds me of a villain from a Batman movie.

#12 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-06-20 02:03 PM

Or Dick Tracy.

#13 | Posted by ClownShack at 2024-06-20 02:15 PM

He's ------- Zippy the Pinhead.

#14 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-06-20 02:32 PM

#12 Whatsleft I agree, he reminds me of the Penguin.

#15 | Posted by Ronnie68 at 2024-06-20 02:47 PM

"secretly videotaped "
(by women who lied and misrepresented themselves, for ethics! and social virtue signalling points)
If it was a public statement, why the 'secretly videotaped'?
Add to this the clumsy misinterpretation, that is the lawyers and judges at the ready so that the neolib counting apparatus doesn't get away with excluding observers, etc, or like in Cobb county actually shredding ballots ahead of an anticipated judicial challenge.
I think he was referring to catching the dems, not rigging by reps. The dems last time got away with things they shouldn't have, because of the latency in the systems designed to prevent them from acting up. They could exclude the observers and shred the ballots, then present it as a fait accompli regardless of any challenge.

#16 | Posted by look_inward at 2024-06-20 07:02 PM

So Hillary goes on record in front of the country and says Dems should not accept the results of the 2020 election if Trump wins and even outlines how they can use the courts to fight back and liberals say nothing. Then, a Rep does it some years later and all of a sudden it's a bad thing. Once again, if you don't like something then hold your own party accountable for doing it before you start making comments about the other party doing it.

But, as usual, if liberals didn't have hypocrisy, they wouldn't have a platform.

#17 | Posted by humtake at 2024-06-21 11:37 AM

Once again, if you don't like something then hold your own party accountable for doing it before you start making comments about the other party doing it.

If you would hold your own party accountable then we world not have to.

When will you hold republicans accountable for J6?

Or is it that you liked what they did on J6?

#18 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-06-21 11:54 AM

World = Would

Sheese.

#19 | Posted by donnerboy at 2024-06-21 11:54 AM

...Hillary...says Dems should not accept the results of the 2020 election...and...outlines how they can use the courts...
#17 | Posted by humtake

And then she and the Dems would have accepted the rulings of those courts, like they always have. TFG tried the courts and lost 60 odd times. What happened then?
If Pubs didn't have false equivalence, they'd have nothing at all.

#20 | Posted by TFDNihilist at 2024-06-21 08:12 PM

@#17 ... So Hillary goes on record in front of the country and says Dems should not accept the results of the 2020 election if Trump wins and even outlines how they can use the courts to fight back and liberals say nothing. ...

The "liberals" said nothing because the results of the 2020 election was accepted.

Why does your alias seem to need to misrepresent what actually occurred in its 5 O'clock Charlie postings?

I mean really?

Does your alias get some manner of joy by showing itself to be, not only totally irrelevant to the discussion, but seeming to enjoy making an utter fool of itself on a mostly daily basis?

Stated differently, what do you expect the outcome of your postings to be, besides the ridicule they currently seem to crave?


#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-06-21 08:32 PM

Going to court to stop the Democrats massive voter fraud operation isn't going to do anything. The courts don't care about the law, the evidence, the facts, or the constitution, and ignored all of them in 2020.

#22 | Posted by THEBULL at 2024-06-22 07:05 AM

Bull gonna do what bull gonna do.
- Bill Pickett
Knower of Bull

#23 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2024-06-22 07:32 AM

"The courts don't care"

6-3 Republican Supreme Court.

#24 | Posted by snoofy at 2024-06-22 07:39 AM

Florida is known as a two-party consent state. This means that, under state law, all parties involved in private conversations must consent to that conversation being recorded.
#6 | POSTED BY LOOK_INWARD

Then let some -------- Florida prosecutor try to indict her. Any comment on your party's plans to try to steal an election again?

#25 | Posted by JOE at 2024-06-22 07:44 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Debate Night (103 comments)

Will Trump Show Up for Tomorrow's Debate? (63 comments)

Biden Border Restrictions Halt Illegal Crossings 40% in 3 Weeks (42 comments)

SCOTUS Affirms Idaho Emergency Abortions (41 comments)

Squad Member Jamaal Bowman Loses Primary (29 comments)

Conservative Groups Creating List of Fed Employees to Fire (25 comments)

Wounded Palestinian Tied to Israeli Jeep as Human Shield (24 comments)

CDC Issues Dengue Fever Alert in the U.S. (22 comments)