The X, formerly known as Twitter, account of journalist Ken Klippenstein was suspended on Thursday following the release of a dossier about Senator JD Vance that was allegedly from an Iranian government hack.
I'm sure Jeff and other DR Conservatives, who heavily criticized Twitter for initially banning some people over the Hunter Biden laptop hack, will be here to complain bitterly. ... Any minute now ...
#14 | Posted by BellRinger
He is not a private citizen but a member of Congress. The author could have blocked out the SSN. Everything else is already out there. Understand that too, anyone can buy this information. Don't pretend even his SSN is not readily available to anyone that pays a few dollars. Don't cry about that one small fact when the rest is of interest.
Here is the Author's take on the dossier and the actual dossier. It is easy to find and readily available. Apologies is this violates site rules.
The X Rules
help.x.com
... X's purpose is to serve the public conversation. Violence, harassment and other similar types of behavior discourage people from expressing themselves, and ultimately diminish the value of global public conversation. Our rules are to ensure all people can participate in the public conversation freely and safely.
Safety
Violent Content: You may share graphic media if it is properly labeled, not prominently displayed and is not excessively gory or depicting sexual violence, but explicitly threatening, inciting, glorifying, or expressing desire for violence is not allowed. Learn more.
Violent & Hateful Entities: You can't affiliate with or promote the activities of violent and hateful entities. ...
"#24. It was used as evidence in a criminal trial against Hunter Biden."
It was introduced as evidence, but despite that fact, the FBI never properly validated the material on the laptop:
I was suspicious, too, because Hines' claim that evidence obtained from the laptop was "largely duplicative" admits that it was not entirely duplicative. His choice of language made it clear there were things on the laptop that were not in the iCloud.www.emptywheel.net
And he did so in a paragraph that tried to obscure how the provenance of the laptop affects the provenance of his other evidence. . .
Over 1,500 days after receiving the laptop, the FBI has not done the things it would need to do to validate the laptop. They don't have an index of what they have and they don't know how all the embedded back-ups relate to one another. Without that, they cannot make representations that the laptop was not tampered with. Indeed, they're making laughably false claims about what they have found uniquely on the laptop, a testament that they don't have the most basic understanding about the laptop...
Since Derek Hines made dubious claims on January 16 that the laptop was "largely duplicative" of material found in Hunter Biden's iCloud, we've since learned one reason he was so squirrelly when he made that claim: his most important evidence for the gun crime doesn't appear to be duplicated in Hunter's iCloud And unless the FBI conducted an unlawful search of Hunter's digital evidence--or unless they indicted based on what they had seen in Murdoch publications--they did not learn that until months after they charged the President's son. And they didn't learn that because four years after obtaining the laptop, the FBI has still never taken basic steps to understand what is on it.
PS Furthermore, Hunter Biden never agreed that the data on the laptop was his:
More importantly, Hines blatantly misstates Hunter Biden's view on the authenticity of the data on the laptop. In Abbe Lowell's response to Hines' motion to bypass any expert witness, he specifically debunked that claim.www.emptywheel.net
Defense counsel has numerous reasons to believe the data had been altered and compromised before investigators obtained the electronic material from Apple Inc. and The Mac Shop, such that the Special Counsel's claim that the underlying data is "authentic" (id. at 4) and accurately reflects "defendant's Apple Macbook Pro and [] hard drive" (id. at 2) is mistaken.
Mr. Biden's counsel told the Special Counsel on May 10, 2024 it agrees not to challenge the authenticity of the electronic data the Special Counsel intends to use with respect to it being what law enforcement received on December 9, 2019 from John Paul Mac Isaac (owner of The Mac Shop), and from Apple on August 29, 2019 and in a follow-up search on July 10, 2020. (Mot. at n.3.) However, Mr. Biden cannot agree this electronic data is "authentic" as to being his data as he used and stored it prior to Mac Issac obtaining it.
He pointedly did not agree that the data derived from the laptop (and hard drive, which I suspect has more irregularities) was "authentic" as to being his own data.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Adult Entertainment Giant Pulls Out of Florida (30 comments)
Trump Calls for Abolishing Debt Limit (29 comments)
The Slow Death of Neon (17 comments)
I should have Invaded Ukraine Earlier, Putin tells Russians in TV Marathon (15 comments)
Lousiana Bars Health Dept. from Promoting Vaccines (14 comments)
Trump's Transition Is Happening over Private Emails (13 comments)
Trump's Shutdown Is A Disaster For Military Families (13 comments)
Rand Paul Floats Elon Musk for Speaker (11 comments)
Trump's Coming House Headaches (10 comments)
Analyst: Apple and Tesla will Be Exempt from Tariffs (8 comments)