Ice Detains U.S. Citizen Claiming His Real ID was Fake

Sunday, May 25, 2025

A video shows a US-born citizen being wrestled to the ground by three officials as he yells 'I'm a citizen' at a construction site in Alabama.

Posted by retort at 09:32 AM | 70 COMMENTS | permalink

ALABAMA: Leonardo Garcia Venegas is an American Citizen. He had a "Real ID". It didn't matter -- because to Trump's American Gestapo, brown is brown.
More: www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/ ... [image or embed]
-- The Tennessee Holler (@thetnholler.bsky.social) May 24, 2025 at 10:21 AM

Comments

Ice Detains U.S. Citizen Claiming His Real ID was Fake

What does this bode for those of use carrying Fake ID?

#1 | Posted by censored at 2025-05-25 10:27 AM

We should probably detain these ICE agents, and waterboard them until they tell us who ordered them to arrest this US citizen.

And thank God it was discovered BEFORE he was sent off to third world hell-hole.

#2 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-25 10:38 AM

No racial profiling here. Nope.

#3 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-05-25 10:58 AM

Can't be true. MAGATS on this site keep telling us that all you have to to do is show your papers and they will leave you be.

#4 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-25 11:10 AM

I hope Mr Venegas sues the Federal Government for illegally detaining him and denying him his freedom of press.

#5 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-25 11:12 AM

The White House needs to answer the question of how close this American born citizen came to being shipped to a secret prison in a foreign country where from which there is no return. What if he had refused to provide his social security number, which is not legally required to do? Would he have received due process or would Trump have just sent him away?

#6 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-25 11:19 AM

"The U.S. government's use of ICE is reminiscent of how governments in countries like Venezuela and Nicaragua have used police and paramilitary units loyal to the president with impunity to suppress dissent."

Alternet

#7 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2025-05-25 11:25 AM

Republican Free Zone.

This is something JeffJ and Boaz said would never happen.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-25 02:18 PM

"Republican Free Zone."

Tell them there are free knives and guns available.

There will be a line to get in.

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-25 02:24 PM

I read that he was obstructing officers.

#10 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-26 01:58 PM

I read that he was obstructing officers.

#10 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Where did you "read" it ?

He was at work and started filming the abductions, according to the article, when he was assaulted and thrown to the ground.

That's what I read in the article.

Evil people do not like it when the light is shined on them in the midst of their evil acts.

#11 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 02:10 PM

" The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement to NBC News that Garcia interfered with an arrest during a targeted worksite operation.

"He physically got in between agents and the subject they were attempting to arrest and refused to comply with numerous verbal commands," said Tricia McLaughlin, DHS assistant secretary. "Anyone who actively obstructs law enforcement in the performance of their sworn duties, including U.S. citizens, will of course face consequences which include arrest."

#12 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-26 02:24 PM

of course jeff believes anything the trump administration on anything they say. fellow fascist.

#13 | Posted by alexandrite at 2025-05-26 02:29 PM

I'm sharing what has been reported, Alexandrite.

Stick it up your rear.

#14 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-26 02:43 PM

. "Anyone who actively obstructs law enforcement in the performance of their sworn duties, including U.S. citizens, will of course face consequences which include arrest."

#12 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

And you believe what homeland security says? They have blatantly violated the civil rights of US citizens how many times now and you still believe what they say?

That's on you. I will wait for a trusted source or for the video evidence.

Anyone who resists fascism will, of course, face consequences!!

And *ONLY THE WEAK WILL FAIL!

* (and those without good lawyers)

#15 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 02:46 PM

I read that he was obstructing officers.
#10 | Posted by BellRinger

Is there a place you want to share with us that you read he was arrested for obstruction?

#16 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 02:47 PM

"Anyone who actively obstructs law enforcement in the performance of their sworn duties, including U.S. citizens, will of course face consequences which include arrest."

That doesn't say anything about the detained citizen.

#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 02:48 PM

"He physically got in between agents and the subject they were attempting to arrest and refused to comply with numerous verbal commands"

That's not obstruction or they would have called it obstruction.

#18 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 02:50 PM

"Garcia interfered with an arrest during a targeted worksite operation."

I guess you have no explanation why they would release someone who was interfering with an arrest.

#19 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 02:51 PM

" for the video evidence. "

I'd like to see that as well.

#20 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-26 02:52 PM

"refused to comply with numerous verbal commands"

I feel like they said that about Rodney King and Eric Garner.

What's the name of the guy they shot in the hotel room as police were giving him contradictory orders, and the cop who killed him is collecting disability for PTSD he gave himself by killing him?

#21 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 02:57 PM

"I'd like to see that as well."

What you should want to see is how they determined his ID was fake.

Since you believe in different rights for citizens, what's to stop them from deciding your ID is fake?

#22 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-26 02:59 PM

I'd like to see that as well.

#20 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Good luck getting that from Homeland Security.

You will probably have to get the Supreme Court to force them to "facilitate" its release. Especially if it contains evidence incriminating or refuting HS.

You would probably have better luck getting the unredacted Epstein Files released.

We can't even get this administration to tell us who is actually in charge of DOGE.

#23 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-26 03:45 PM

I read that he was obstructing officers.

#10 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Gutes deutsch will believe any and everything they serve him.

#24 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-26 04:18 PM

No, I'm not jumping to conclusions. Donnerboy said he wants to see video. So do I. You clowns knee jerk respond to everything. From my POV maybe this guy was treated improperly. Maybe not. I'm seeing conflicting reporting.

You are just seeing a----------.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-26 04:26 PM

maybe? maybe he was treated improperly? you're an idiot. trump never follows the law, and he only tells the truth in court because of perjury.

yet you think he or his minions dont constantly violate the constitution.

you approve because Republican. period.

#26 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-05-26 05:46 PM

I read that he was obstructing officers

#10 | Posted by BellRinger

Then why was he not arrested and charged with obstruction? Sounds like ICE is lying.

#27 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-26 06:31 PM

You are just seeing a----------.

#25 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

Oh please.

#28 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-26 10:13 PM

" Sounds like ICE is lying.

#27 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE AT 2025-05-26 06:31 PM | REPLY"

That's certainly possible.

Alexandrite is 100% convinced of it and will not alter his opinion even if video evidence ultimately proves otherwise (I'm speaking hypothetically).

#29 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-26 11:33 PM

I'm 100% convinced that the trump administration lies constantly.

Unless it's in court. So I'll let the facts come to court and see what a judge/jury thinks. The one place Trump CANT lie, which is why he is attacking the courts every day.

#30 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-05-27 12:26 AM

The Trump administration has numerous flaws and faults.

I will give credit where it's due, however. This has been the most transparent administration in my lifetime. Accessibility to the press has never been more abundant. They are in front of the press constantly and always take questions.

#31 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 12:48 AM

They are in front of the press (that they have not kicked out of the building) constantly and always take questions (which they may or may not answer).

#32 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 01:12 AM

Here's the administration being super transparent and answering questions:

www.google.com

#33 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 01:17 AM

Redial,

I'm sure you can find examples to the contrary. I am talking big picture and am using prior administrations as a measuring stick.

Again, this administration has tons of flaws and faults. This just happens to be a strength. Compare this administration with the last one (or three) in terms of being accessible.

Don't be Snoofy You are better than that.

#34 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:30 AM

I'm sure you can find examples to the contrary.

Yes. The internet is full of them.

#35 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 01:33 AM

Am I wrong? If so, please expound.

#36 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:39 AM

Jeff supports a traitor to the United States of America. It's sad to see but there it is in all of its glory. What a travesty this 6.

#37 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 01:44 AM

Laura Mohr,

Was the Biden administration more or less accessible to the press than the current administration?

#38 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:47 AM

Was the Biden administration more or less accessible to the press than the current administration?

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:47 AM |

Yes. Biden didn't ban a news corp for going against his policies unlike Trump. AP Vis a vis Gulf of America anyone??

#39 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 01:51 AM

Biden didn't ban a news corp for going against his policies

Biden also wasn't a raving narcissist that needed media attention more than oxygen.

#40 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 01:53 AM

Oh and the Biden Administration didn't try to overthrow the Constitution and the rule of law when Kamala lost either. That's strictly a Trump thing.

#41 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 01:53 AM

In a few months Trump has taken more press questions than Biden took in 4 years, Laura Mohr.

Same with Vance v Harris.

#42 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:54 AM

"Biden also wasn't a raving narcissist that needed media attention more than oxygen."

Oh. So now being accessible is a bad thing and Biden hiding in his basement is somehow better?

This is seal-clubbing Canuckistan-logic.

#43 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:56 AM

In a few months Trump has taken more press questions than Biden took in 4 years, Laura Mohr.
Same with Vance v Harris.
Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:54 AM | Reply

That's a lie and you know it too. Why do you insist on lying Jeff?? Seriously

#44 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 01:57 AM

Oh . So now being accessible is a bad thing and Biden hiding in his basement is somehow better?
This is seal-clubbing Canuckistan-logic.
Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:56 AM | Reply

There was a pandemic going on. He didn't want to get people sick unlike Trump who needed his ego stroked on minutes basis.

#45 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 01:59 AM

I am being 100% truthful, Laura Mohr and can easily back it up.

Eff off.

#46 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:59 AM

I am being 100% truthful, Laura Mohr and can easily back it up.
Eff off.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 01:59 AM | Reply

Prove it. You saying it doesn't make it so.

#47 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 02:01 AM

In a few months Trump has taken more press questions than Biden took in 4 years

How many did he answer? He's good with questions like, "Mr. President, how can you go on being so awesome day after day without it going to your head?", but if he doesn't like the question he just won't answer it.

#48 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 02:01 AM

A quick Google search provided this:

"These are results for number of press questions taken by trump vs number taken by biden
Search instead for nuber of press questions taken by trump vs number taken by biden

AI Overview
Learn more
Reports indicate a significant difference between the number of press questions taken by Donald Trump and Joe Biden, particularly during their time in office.
Here's a summary of the reported differences:
Donald Trump:
Cabinet Meetings: Trump reportedly answered roughly 90 press questions during his first three open press Cabinet meetings in 2025.
First Month in Office (Second Term): Trump answered over 1,000 questions from journalists during his first month in his second term, according to the New York Post.
Overall: Trump is known for his frequent interactions with the press, often turning executive order signings and other events into impromptu press conferences.
Joe Biden:
Cabinet Meetings: Biden reportedly answered a total of five press questions over nine Cabinet meetings during his entire term.
First Month in Office: Biden took 141 questions from the press during his first month in office, significantly less than Trump's reported 1,000+ in the same timeframe.
Overall: Biden is generally considered to have a less frequent and less informal interaction style with the press compared to Trump."

FFS - I dislike Trump. Big time. Holy heck. For all of the suck this administration is extremely accessible to the press.

#49 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:05 AM

For all of his faults, Trump actually answers questions. I don't like some of his answers, but he's out there in front of the press and taking questions to a degree that I haven't seen from prior administrations in my lifetime.

Big picture - compared against W, Obama or Biden?

WAY more transparent. WAY more accessible. He sucks in so many ways. Don't even get me going on tariffs. On this particular issue - this admin is WAY more accessible to the press than any going back beyond W.

#50 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:12 AM

Is "Your network sucks" considered an answer?

#51 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 02:14 AM

You cannot refute anything I've said.

I provided statistical evidence.

You've got nothing.

Stuff it up your rear.

#52 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:19 AM

WAY more accessible.

He's even throwing himself a parade!

#53 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 02:20 AM

Funny the only ones reporting that are right winged websites. Nothing mainstream. I wonder why??

#54 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 02:24 AM

I provided stats.

you clowns are absolutely pathetic.

#55 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:27 AM

According to Laura Mohr and Redial, the Biden adminstration was the pinnacle of openness and transparency.

Effing clowns.

#56 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:31 AM

I provided stats.
you clowns are absolutely pathetic.

Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:27 AM | Reply
Made up stats you mean??

#57 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 02:32 AM

Nope. Real stats.

#58 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:40 AM

theconversation.com

Trump White House goes 300+ days without a press briefing " why that's unprecedented

#59 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-05-27 02:41 AM

Wow. I actually read that garbage.

#60 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:51 AM

According to Laura Mohr and Redial, the Biden adminstration was the pinnacle of openness and transparency.

Keep all that straw away from open flames.

#61 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 03:21 AM

While this "transparency discussion" is all very interesting, WTF does it have to do with the topic of this thread?

The thread has been completely derailed since post #31. Hey, poster of #31, I'll acknowledge that you've very adeptly shut down the original thread and diverted all discussion to another topic. So, how about starting another thread instead of hijacking this thread?

#62 | Posted by TrueBlue at 2025-05-27 05:33 AM

"Wow. I actually read that garbage"

Seriously, Jeffy, your posting history indicates you have a strong appetite for garbage.

#63 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-05-27 06:08 AM

FFS - I dislike Trump. Big time. Holy heck. For all of the suck this administration is [lying out its ---- every time they talk to the press]
FTFY

#49 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-05-27 02:05 AM | Reply | Flag

#64 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-05-27 07:57 AM

Donnerboy said he wants to see video. So do I.

#25 | Posted by BellRinger

Unfortunately the "most transparent administration" of your lifetime ended the Biden admin policy that required federal law enforcement agents to wear body cams.

#65 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-05-27 08:06 AM

lol gutes Deutsch is such a knob.

Meanwhile, in reality

drudge.com

#66 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-27 09:12 AM

Being accessible to some of the press and answering some questions when doing so is to advance his authoritarian agenda is not a positive

#67 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-05-27 09:39 AM

Also, babbling or lying to the press to try and control the message while you insist to SCOTUS that you don't have to say who's leading an illegal "department" like DOGE or respond to valid oversight requests from Congress regarding its activities and actions is the antithesis of transparency.

For someone who constantly blathers about Pravda, he seems to be a complete blithering moron when confronted with it. Duhhhh TrAnZpArenSIeZ!!! What a joke.

#68 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-27 10:16 AM

WAY more transparent. WAY more accessible.
#50 | Posted by BellRinger

Nobody believes you, not even you.
Who runs DOGE?
Does The Constitution apply to Citizens or People?

#69 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 11:31 AM

" WAY more transparent."

The fact the censorship, grifting, bribery, corruption, Constitution violations, and Presidential family profiteering from the office ARE ALL OUT IN THE OPEN ...

... isn't the flex you think it is.

#70 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-05-27 11:48 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Minnesota Democratic Lawmaker Killed after Multiple 'targeted' Shootings (240 comments)