LAMP

What opinions? She has a slew of pre-trial motions on her desk that she hasn't even looked t yet.

Assuming she has clerks to do the grunt work, there aren't many other conclusions.

LAMP

..." She's new to this. And she wants to make sure her opinions hold up. ..."

Really? After almost two years since the first subpoena. (August 8, 2020)

Other than the obvious slow walking, the other two conclusions are too lazy or too dumb for the job.

I'm inclined to believe she's just running out the clock on Trump's behalf. Much like what's happening in Georgia and the U.S. Supreme Court.

CATDOG

Just to keep the record straight, the hearing before Judge Cannon the other day was about dismissing the charges against Trump's co-defendant, Walt Nauda. The hearing got very volatile and turned into a shouting match between attorneys that lasted well into the afternoon session.

Judge Cannon lost control of her courtroom and did not make a ruling from the bench.

If you want to review the nuts and bolts of this cage match that went on in that courtroom, please read the link. We need to keep things in perspective.

This hearing was only one in a host of other motions, perhaps even more than 100, that have been piling up on Cannon's desk, unaddressed, for nearly two years ~ some of which were (reportedly) too ridiculous for words. With all the recourses available to a federal judge, including competent clerks to do her grunt work, I find it unlikely that she let these motions pile up for nearly two years is because she feared a reversal. She knew that she could not set a court date until all the motions had been adjudicated. Therefore, she ignored the motions.

It couldn't be any more clear that she was stalling for time for the benefit of Donald Trump.

She really should be removed from the bench and disbarred for her bias, partisanship, incompetence, dereliction of duty and violation of her oath to be impartial.