It's called paraphrasing, but that's how this comes off.

#6 | POSTED BY SITZKRIEG

So. Ok for you to "paraphrase" a statement to make it conform with what you think it means but when democrats do it they are just plain lying or hyperventilating or whatever. Even when it turns out they were correct. (Years later)

Got it.

BTW - Trump's poised to turn this into a huge win for him. All he has to do is tone down his rhetoric a bit, sound "inclusive enough."

...

Yeah that's not how Trumpy thinks.

He will use this and double down on the violent rhetoric.

"Fight!"
"Fight!"
"Fight!"

Will be the new "lock her up!" chant.

This is not the end of political violence in America.

Sadly. This is just the beginning.

So much for the liberal bloodless coup.

Blood has already been spilled.

And it's not near enough to satisfy magatonians bloodlust for violence yet.

"So much for the liberal bloodless coup."

Should have been

So much for the liberals allowing a bloodless coup ...

"To me, Trump's rhetoric hasn't been anything close to stoking flames of discord...at least no more than any other time in memorable history."

Then you just haven't been paying attention.

January 6 was the clearest example you will probably ever get of "stroking the flames of discord".

Were you in a coma on January 6th while the rest of us watched in horror while Trumpy incited a mob to VIOLENTLY attack the U.S. Capitol while Congress was in session with the mob threatening to hang Mike Pence and Nancy Pelosi?

For a speech to be considered violent speech it has to be likely to cause - and this is very important - imminent violent action.

Trumps speech on January 6 incited the mob to immediately march to the Capitol and commit violent action.