Just remember all you DR lib kids, the healthcare in those facilities are government run (or, the very least, government funded which forces the entities to conform to federal law).

While remembering that, remember YOU want the government to also run healthcare for the entire country.

If you can't connect the dots, you are a partisan person who has allowed yourself to be groomed by your party instead of being an independent thinker who actually has the ability to criticize your party. And it's not a bad thing to criticize your party so that they start acting right. Unfortunately, Dems have failed to do that.

Luckily, we have many developed nations who do let the government run their healthcare. And, fortunately for those who actually have been to those countries and understand the dichotomy, you also can plainly see the comparisons between US prison healthcare and the healthcare of those countries. And I'm not trying to be mean about it, it's obvious those countries' healthcare systems aren't run like what we see in US prisons...but the negatives of government healthcare DO match up. And, until Dems find a way to counter those negatives so they aren't so negative to the entire country, the current iteration of government healthcare Dems want is fraught with too much corruption and negative impacts to the masses. I'd love universal healthcare IF someone could find a way to do it that wouldn't lessen the healthcare I get today. And it will, there is no doubt about that at all. Just like there is no doubt about it that it would probably be cheaper in the long run for everyone (even with taxes going up to pay for it). So, while there are some positives to it, the negatives are too much and that can be plainly seen by understanding the relationship of the socialized healthcare to our US prison system.