Advertisement
Republicans' Populism Sounds Very Liberal
Pay attention to an important shift in tone in Washington as Republicans evolve with President Donald Trump's brand of populism.
Menu
Front Page Breaking News Comments Flagged Comments Recently Flagged User Blogs Write a Blog Entry Create a Poll Edit Account Weekly Digest Stats Page RSS Feed Back Page
Subscriptions
Read the Retort using RSS.
RSS Feed
Author Info
lee_the_agent
Joined 2005/05/24Visited 2025/05/22
Status: user
MORE STORIES
Trump: Traitors Manipulated Biden (5 comments) ...
Republicans' Populism Sounds Very Liberal (15 comments) ...
The Saturday Dept of BS (9 comments) ...
Trump Declares the End of American Imperial Globalism (5 comments) ...
DNC Panel Recommends Firing David Hogg (19 comments) ...
Alternate links: Google News | Twitter
In some countries, including those facing national elections soon, political leaders who've advocated a homegrown style of MAGA are suddenly scrambling to distance themselves from the U.S. president.[image or embed] -- NPR (@npr.org) April 23, 2025 at 7:28 AM
In some countries, including those facing national elections soon, political leaders who've advocated a homegrown style of MAGA are suddenly scrambling to distance themselves from the U.S. president.[image or embed]
Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.
Maybe Republicans can work their way back to their 1956 RNC platform.
#1 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-05-18 12:25 PM | Reply
Some of the president's goals dovetail with things Democrats have been talking about for a long time.
I've been saying this since the 2020 election cycle.
It's hilarious to me to watch MAGA idiots adopt "liberal" positions and talking points as if they're newly realized problems they have the solutions for, completely devoid of any acknowledgement that their voting practices since Reagan have caused the vast majority of them.
#2 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-18 01:56 PM | Reply
This is Trump trying to hold onto swing voters; he hasn't got a serious political ideology of his own. What he has is personal survival instincts.
#3 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-18 02:24 PM | Reply
"#2 | Posted by jpw"
Trump is a 1990's style Democrats - that is why I vote for him. I would not for a pre-MAGA GOP or the currently insane version of the Democrat party. Apparently, a majority of the country agrees with me. The better question for you - if you supported those policies 25 years ago when they were put forth by Democrats - why you do condemn Trump now for it?
You sound like the GOP when Clinton was president. 'He keeps on stealing our ideas' they shouted in anger. Well, your ideas were being implemented - you should be happy unless it is recognition you wanted all along and not the policies themselves.
#4 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-05-18 06:54 PM | Reply
"[Clinton] keeps on stealing our ideas," they shouted in anger.
--ScatS
Really? Clinton and Gingrich were making policy together while taking hummers from 21-year-olds in White House anterooms. And Gingrich at that time was giving the GOP its marching orders. "Trump is a 1990's style Democrats - that is why I vote for him." Guessing you voted for Gore/Lieberman, too, huh?
Clinton in retrospect was a pretty crappy president, perhaps worst of all for destroying generations of predominantly poor and Black/Brown families by encouraging a massive surge in their incarceration.
Sounds like a GOP policy to me, now that you mention it.
#5 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2025-05-18 08:33 PM | Reply
The better question for you - if you supported those policies 25 years ago when they were put forth by Democrats - why you do condemn Trump now for it?
You mistake the problem with the policies.
One doesn't have to accept Trump's roughshod run over the Constitution to admit there are problems in need of being fixed.
I can still think offshoring was stupid and that we need to rebuild a manufacturing base here in the US. Doesn't mean I have to agree that tariffs are a good idea or a POTUS trying to bully corps into eating the cost of his reckless policy.
#6 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-19 12:51 AM | Reply
The initial concept for NAFTA was proposed by Ronald Reagan in 1980 during his presidential campaign. NAFTA was negotiated and written under George HW Bush, who signed it along with the leaders of Mexico and Canada in December 1992, pending ratification by the legislatures of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
Clinton wasn't president yet. What he signed in 1993 was the ratified agreement.
#7 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-05-19 02:32 AM | Reply
Yeah, it's easy to see how the parties change over time like this. Reps today are more for what Dems were for in the 90s, including immigration, wanting changes, etc. Liberals today are all about keeping things the way they've always been and catering to big business.
This occurred in the 70s too. After the liberal movements of the 60s, the 70s saw them become much less about freedom and more about controlling the masses based on moral grounds.
#8 | Posted by humtake at 2025-05-19 11:55 AM | Reply
"I can still think offshoring was stupid and that we need to rebuild a manufacturing base here in the US. Doesn't mean I have to agree that tariffs are a good idea or a POTUS trying to bully corps into eating the cost of his reckless policy."
This is the problem with American politics, or at least the two-party system. Biden and Obama did nothing to solve the problem. They put band-aids on stuff just like Reps do but nothing was actually done to a) identify where the country can do better (efficiencies, FWA, etc.) and b) analyze incoming vs. outgoing and figure out what level of income is needed to ensure we have more than what is outgoing.
I loved when Obama campaigned on using a scalpel to go through government programs to identify all of the FWA. Liberals ABSOLUTELY loved it. But he never did it. Then DOGE comes along to do EXACTLY what Obama wanted and all of a sudden liberals completely disagree with doing it. When, in reality, we should ALL not care about who does it and just ensure SOMEONE does it. But the two-party system doesn't work like that. In fact, the two-party system has gotten so bad and corrupt that, even when billions in savings is realized, the party not doing it actually tries to get everyone to believe that those savings aren't actually beneficial. And I mean the real improvements. I'm not saying everything DOGE has done was done the right way or cause more expenses downstream than the fix. But there ARE still billions of dollars being saved that were 100% FWA and liberals are trying to convince this country that that is a bad thing (and DR can't deny it at all since you have actively put multiple articles on this site about this very topic).
So, when you say you agree with rebuilding manufacturing in America, then you are saying one of two things in your statement...a) you feel inaction is better than an action you do not agree with or b) you feel only your side should ever be the one who fixes anything, even when they don't. Either way, both of those options are why America never fixes anything anymore.
#9 | Posted by humtake at 2025-05-19 12:06 PM | Reply
"Biden and Obama did nothing to solve the problem."
There was a President between Biden and Obama. Did that one do anything to solve the problem?
#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-19 12:10 PM | Reply
"Then DOGE comes along to do EXACTLY what Obama wanted "
Complete nonsense. DOGE hasn't identified and Fraud, Waste, and Abuse. They just cut programs that Trump doesn't like. They don't identify any actual fraud.
They say "cancer research is fraud, waste, and abuse." They cut cancer research. You agree that it's fraud. That's all that's happening.
#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-19 12:14 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1
"even when billions in savings is realized"
DOGE is costing billions, not saving billions.
#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-19 12:15 PM | Reply
There's no savings. The stated purpose of the DOGE cuts is to pay for Tax Cuts for the Rich. So "we" aren't realizing any savings. We're cutting spending to pay for a tax cut, which means the cuts won't generate any revenue.
#13 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-19 12:17 PM | Reply
I think Josh Hawley is fixin to run for POTUS.
#14 | Posted by horstngraben at 2025-05-19 02:08 PM | Reply
#14: I think Josh Hawley is fixin' to run for POTUS. Good. He's an excellent runner: youtu.be
#15 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-05-19 02:19 PM | Reply
Post a commentComments are closed for this entry.Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy
Comments are closed for this entry.
Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy