USSECSTATE: Visa Revocation for Celebrants of Kirk Death

Tuesday, September 16, 2025

The most underqualified individual to ever lead the US State Department, the vapid empty suit Marco Rubio, threatened to revoke the visas of foreigners visiting the US if they are celebrating the fortuitous demise of hatemongering good-for-nothing college dropout Charlie Kirk. Tragically, with all of the technologies available to the diabolical Dummkopf Trumpf junta, an army of ICE Sturmabteilung ready to carry out mass deportations, and an out-of-control police state budget, this idiotic time and money wasting threat is feasible, as unfortunate Palestinians studying in the US have discovered this year.

Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 04:01 AM | 29 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

The deplorable USSECSTATE Marco Rubio who dismantled the life-saving JFK legacy, USAID: i1.wp.com

#1 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-09-16 04:06 AM | Reply

Insecure fascists gonna do their insecure fascist thang, playing to the peanut gallery.

#2 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-09-16 04:54 AM | Reply

#2: Below you'll see a single representative of "Blacks for Trump," Kristi Noem's puppy apparently survived the assassination attempt on him, Steve Bannon has a cloud of filth lingering around him, and RFK Jr wants to dispense psychiatric help for five cents.

static.wikia.nocookie.net

#3 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-09-16 05:09 AM | Reply

Ok, now bear with me "free speech absolutist" righties.

This is actually what the 1A is about. Because this is actual government censorship.

See now what you were supposed to be complaining about the entire time?

#4 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-16 09:01 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Headline fail

Fake Dr wants to extend the 1A to the world so they can come to our country and stir shtt up.

"threatened to revoke the visas of foreigners visiting the US"

Don't come here to stir shtt up.

#5 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-16 01:31 PM | Reply

---- off you mewling ----.

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-16 02:32 PM | Reply

---- off you mewling ----.

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-09-16 02:32 PM | Reply | Flag:

Right after you, you pathetic excuse for a human being. Don't you have suicide to assist or something? Your mom should have flushed your ass.

#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-16 03:15 PM | Reply

Most people aren't thinking about Charlie Kirk's death.

But, Republicans need to hang on to his death in order to keep the media focused on nothing else.

Especially not the fact senate republicans voted not to release the Epstein files on 09/10.

Or the fact Trump and republicans have tanked our economy.

Or the fact we've lost trillions in trade with other nations.

Or the fact Trump is robbing America.

Hell, there's been several other people killed in shootings since 09/10, including school students, and their deaths aren't even being acknowledged.

No. Charlie Kirk's death is advantageous for Trump and republicans.

Republicans are ghouls.

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-16 03:25 PM | Reply

#8: Charlie Kirk's death is advantageous for Trumpf and Republicans. Republicans are ghouls.

"Let's keep bloviating about useless Charlie Kirk while we continue pilfering the US economy."
Signed,
GOP Leadership

#9 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-09-16 03:39 PM | Reply

Seems to be the current agenda.

#10 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-16 03:46 PM | Reply

No. Charlie Kirk's death is advantageous for Trump and republicans.

#8 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-16 03:25 PM | Reply | Flag:

Is this where you try to convince yourself that it wasn't another rage-filled LGBTQ member who planned/executed another high profile shooting/murder? Are you going to try to tell us that the Trump Admin had Charlie killed so they could take advantage politically? Did Trump add one to the body count again like he did in Butler, PA?

#11 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-16 04:03 PM | Reply

Is this where you try to convince yourself

No need, I'm letting the facts speak for themselves.

Charlie Kirk's shooter is a far right lunatic and the Trump administration couldn't be happier to spin Kirk's death into an attack on democrats.

Right wing media has been lying about the facts surrounding Charlie Kirk's death starting with the Wall Street Journal publishing an article about the bullet shell being engraved with pro trans messaging.

We're witnessing a full blitz by the extreme right, led by Donald Trump, JD Vance and Stephen Miller to use Charlie Kirk's death to their advantage to attack the Democratic Party.

Meanwhile, no talk about the MAGA kid in Denver who killed two students or the members of ICE who killed a father while dropping off their kid.

Face it.

The only reason you're pretending to give a shht about Charlie Kirk is because you're hoping to attack democrats and liberals.

Otherwise it's just another gun death amongst the countless gun deaths that occur in American on a daily basis.

#12 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-16 04:10 PM | Reply | Funny: 1 | Newsworthy 1

"Social media companies correcting false statements on a deadly pandemic is a violation of the first amendment" - MAGATS
"We must censor anyone who posts actual quotes from Charlie Kirk in a context that might make me think he's not Jesus" - Also MAGATS

#13 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-09-16 05:16 PM | Reply

Not the 'response that the far left were hoping for....

'Charlie Kirk's social media platforms gain millions of followers, subscribers since assassination'

#14 | Posted by MSgt at 2025-09-16 10:36 PM | Reply

Charlie Kirk's social media platforms gain millions of followers, subscribers since assassination'

Will his ghost be posting updates?

#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-16 10:48 PM | Reply

Charlie Kirk's social media platforms gain millions of followers, subscribers since assassination'

#14 | Posted by MSgt

Is this the same as Fox News hosts being "#1 bestselling authors" because their books are bought by the pallet by political groups to inflate presence?

#16 | Posted by jpw at 2025-09-16 11:30 PM | Reply

" #16 | POSTED BY JPW AT 2025-09-16 11:30 PM | FLAG: "

Applications for new TPU chapters have been massive since the assassination.

#17 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 01:00 AM | Reply

#17 | Posted by BellRinger

Cool story. Tell us what you think about this new wave of government censorship from the Trump administration.

#18 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-09-17 01:35 AM | Reply

" Cool story. Tell us what you think about this new wave of government censorship from the Trump administration.

#18 | POSTED BY JOHNNY_HOTSAUCE AT 2025-09-17 01:35 AM | REPLY"

Where do you draw a line at VISA revocation? I'm not trying to argue. I'm curious.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 01:47 AM | Reply

Where do you draw a line at VISA revocation? I'm not trying to argue. I'm curious.

#19 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 01:47 AM | Reply | Flag:

You're messing up the spin...

#20 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2025-09-17 09:36 AM | Reply

another rage-filled LGBTQ member who planned/executed another high profile shooting/murder?

#11 | POSTED BY LFTHNDTHRD

Well, it doesn't seem that way.

How often do you and your buddies get together, smoke dope, drink beer, and discuss politics?

#21 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-17 09:42 AM | Reply

Charlie Kirk's social media platforms gain millions of followers, subscribers since assassination'

#14 | POSTED BY MSGT

Ah, but he can't take them any place they don't already want to go.

#22 | Posted by Zed at 2025-09-17 09:43 AM | Reply

Where do you draw a line at VISA revocation? I'm not trying to argue. I'm curious.
#19 | Posted by BellRinger

You answer my question with a question? I figured my question would be super simple for anyone who is as a big proponent of the first amendment as you've claimed to be.
Here's my answer to your question. The government may restrict the issuance of a visa based on speech but does not have the authority to revoke them based on speech once the person is within our borders. The first amendment is not limited to citizens and I'll refer you to Justice Francis Murphey's concurring opinion in Bridges v. Wixon.

#23 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-09-17 10:50 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Johnny Hotsauce,

Sorry. I meant to answer last night. Got distracted with something else and went to bed.

Here is my answer:

As a strong proponent of 1A we do not revoke VISA's simply because the applicants have repugnant viewpoints and may well hate this country. The viewpoints are repugnant but no criminal act has taken place So, yeah, I strongly oppose this. Moving forward ... .VISA's are residential access for a specified time period. Once a VISA expires all bets are off. One of the D- bags applies for a renewal? Nope. Get your America hating mixer celebrating ass out of this country and don't let the door hit your rear on the way out.

#24 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 12:56 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Mixer = murder

#25 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 12:56 PM | Reply

Will his ghost be posting updates?
#15 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-09-16 10:48 PM | Reply

Worse. Temu Trump AKA JD Vance.

#26 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-09-17 01:05 PM | Reply

#24 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 12:56 PM | Reply

Oh but hating on America is an American value so you're going to punish for that?? Interesting.

#27 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2025-09-17 01:19 PM | Reply

" Oh but hating on America is an American value so you're going to punish for that?? Interesting.

#27 | POSTED BY LAURAMOHR AT 2025-09-17 01:19 PM | REPLY"

Punish? No. That's why I am so opposed to revoking VISA's. Among other things it sends a chilling message. What I was saying is that obtaining a VISA is a privilege, not a right. We should not extend the privilege of granting a VISA to people who have demonstrated hatred for our country and/or cheered the assassination of a public figure.

#28 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-09-17 01:29 PM | Reply

#28 - look at that. We agree on something. I will just add that refusal to renew visas must be backed by a consistent policy.

For instance, the administration must not be allowed to reject renewal applications for anyone who expresses opinions of Kirk's death that the administration doesn't agree with but approve applications for those who express similar sentiment in regards to Melissa Hortman's death.

This administration has not shown me they can be trusted to act in such a non-partisan manner.

#29 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2025-09-17 01:57 PM | Reply