Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, November 07, 2025

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Quelle surprise.

Pres Trump's SCOTUS allows him to not feed Americans.


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-07 10:34 PM | Reply

What a country we live in.

Thanks magat scum.

#2 | Posted by truthhurts at 2025-11-07 10:49 PM | Reply

"Let Them Eat Court Orders."

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-07 11:21 PM | Reply

Maybe if your beloved Dem party didn't keep filibustering a clean CR ... ...

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2025-11-07 11:27 PM | Reply

"clean CR"

How would that affect Trump's diktat?

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-11-07 11:30 PM | Reply

@#4 ... Maybe if your beloved Dem party didn't keep filibustering a clean CR ...

Maybe if the Republicans want to stop denying healthcare to Americans ...


#6 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-11-07 11:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Maybe if your beloved Dem party didn't keep filibustering a clean CR ... ...

#4 | POSTED BY BELLRINGER

The Dems have clearly said they will not support a clean CR for this administration because they cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the American People. They have made that very clear. And Trumpy refuses to even negotiate so here we are. Waiting for republicans to come to their senses. Again.

Defying court orders and refusing to use funds available to feed the hungry is proof positive of Trumpy's uncaring attitude to Americans in need.

Building a ballroom and having a glamorous Gatsby party while innocent children and the elderly go hungry in America is just not a good look for the now not so beloved Republicans Party and is just icing on the hate cake.

Meanwhile the holiday season is almost upon us!

We gonna have sum fun then! Especially as the airlines slowly grind to a halt.

#7 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-11-08 10:17 AM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#4 If a majority party does NOT have a super-majority, then it is incumbent upon the majority party to work with the minority party to get enough votes to obtain cloture.

Most people call this compromise, coming-together, working together.

If the majority cannot do that, then they've failed as leaders of the country and are nothing more than sycophants.

Why are you defending a bunch of failures who cannot do the basic job of governance?

#8 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:19 AM | Reply

#4 There is no "clean CR" in the mix anymore. A "temporary bill" is already being written in the Senate (looking at you, Sen Ron from Wis).

But, it will go nowhere.

Why? you may ask:

Because Speaker Mike (R-Of course) REFUSES to bring the House back into session.

Because of the Epstein files.

As such, the House will have to be back in session to vote on the soon-to-be changed bill.

But the House WILL NOT be back in session, anytime in the foreseeable future.

#9 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:20 AM | Reply

#4 I also highly recommend that you look into the phrase "recission veto," and then tell us why Democrats should just bend over and take it**.....

Well, you know.

Trump & the Republicans cannot be counted on to keep their word.

They have zero integrity.

** "The user's query refers to a 2012 statement by Richard Mourdock, a former Indiana Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate. During his campaign, Mourdock stated that his idea of compromise was for Democrats to join the Republican point of view.

#10 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:20 AM | Reply

#4 The problem with trying to blame Democrats for the shutdown is that the Trump and the GOP have let everyone know that THEY control Washington (POTUS, Congress, SCOTUS). It always seems to be "HaHaHa You lost" (from the Trump on down).

So, no matter how you slice or dice it, this is on the GOP... and the American people know it.

Plus, you add in the upcoming health care sticker shock, inflation ($20-30.00/pound beef) and the overall corruption, on what Earth do people rally behind THAT?

So, how are people supposed to unite behind that AND THIS:

- Why has the Trump given $40,000,000,000.00 of American taxpayer money, to a country known for defaulting on previous international loans?

- When are the Epstein files going to be released?

- Why did Kristi Noem spend $172,000,000.00 of American taxpayer money for not one, but 2 Gulfstream private jets (the US Government already has a fleet of air transportation exclusively for executive- and Cabinet-level personnel)?

- Why is there a Qatari Air Force Base - Qatari, a country that's financed international terrorism - being built in Idaho in the USA?

- Why has the Trump added $2,000,000,000,000.00 (and climbing) to the nation's debt just since he took office in January, 2025?

#11 | Posted by A_Friend at 2025-11-08 10:21 AM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort