Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, December 05, 2025

President Donald Trump has hired a new architect for the White House ballroom amid disputes between the president and the architect originally contracted to complete the project, several sources have told CNN.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

James McCrery II, who was brought on board by Trump to serve as the lead architect, reportedly expressed concern it could 'dwarf' the White House.

[image or embed]

-- USA TODAY (@usatoday.com) Nov 27, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

... amid disputes between the president and the architect originally contracted to complete the project ...

Architect: What do you mean, you want the walls to be gold clad?

Pres Trump: Just what I said.

Architect: That's just gross. I'm outta here.

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-04 06:21 PM | Reply

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-12-04 06:24 PM | Reply

The disagreement: Trump wanted the ballroom BIGGER than the White House.

#3 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-12-05 08:34 PM | Reply

They're even changing the name to, 'the Baal Room'.

(i stole that)

#4 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-05 08:54 PM | Reply

Trump has yet to settle on his Speer.

#5 | Posted by horstngraben at 2025-12-05 11:02 PM | Reply

Should this paean to Diaperman actually be constructed, I would like to suggest a president in the future might consider tearing the rococo edifice down, and replace it with a reflecting pool to give pause to the next crass, moneybag-laden doofus that inexplicablyfinagles his way into the Presidency.

#6 | Posted by dutch46 at 2025-12-05 11:31 PM | Reply

HAs everyone forgotten Trump's m.o. for wiggling out of paying his construction bills?

He's well known for driving businesses into bankruptcy trying to collect their fee.

My guess is architect #1 isn't going to get paid. And probably architect #2 either after Trump picks a fight with him.

After the International Hotel scam in D.C., I thought contractors had learned a lesson. GET YOUR MONEY UP FRONT.

#7 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-06 06:15 AM | Reply

When and if completed, according to current (ever fluctuating) "plans," the Donald J. Trump White House Monument to Monumental Wretched Taste & Money Laundry Annex is slated to be about twice as big as the White House. And that's the minimum.

Let that sink in.

#8 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-12-06 06:24 AM | Reply

DOC

"slated to be about twice as big as the White House. And that's the minimum."

And why not? Trump doesn't plan to pay to pay for it anyway. He'll fabricate some complaint and call the construction "poor" and then badmouth the contractor.

You'd think the business community in D.C. would be aware of Trump's scams by now.

#9 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-06 07:22 AM | Reply

TWINPAC
How and why people get themselves into "deals" with Trump remains a bit of a mystery for me, even now.

I mean, I understand the self-interest angle, whether it's the promise of money, publicity, access, whatever. But self-interest also includes trying to anticipate consequences, certainly narrow and personal (although one might hope for more).

And Trump has a long history of effing over virtually everybody who bumps into his wobbly orbit.

So, yeah, you'd think.

#10 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2025-12-06 08:05 AM | Reply

DOC

Sometimes it's just the excitement as in "WOW, the President of the United States picked ME"

As I always say, "Too late comes sooner than you think."

I suspect, as usual, the donor money to pay for this monstrosity will end up in Trump's pocket, one way or the other.

#11 | Posted by Twinpac at 2025-12-06 08:36 AM | Reply

Pro tip to the new architect to the royal court: don't update your resume and LinkedIn profile just yet ...

#12 | Posted by catdog at 2025-12-06 08:45 AM | Reply

Anyone who thinks he building this just so he can leave right before it's finished is NUTS!

#13 | Posted by Corky at 2025-12-06 01:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 2

Related ...

Trump defends rising cost of ballroom amid criticism
www.newsnationnow.com

... President Trump on Saturday defended high costs associated with his White House ballroom project, telling critics that the space will be "much bigger and more beautiful" when completed.

Trump first slammed CNN's chief White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins for asking about the changing price tag.

"Caitlin Collin's of Fake News CNN, always Stupid and Nasty, asked me why the new Ballroom was costing more money than originally thought one year ago," the president wrote on Truth Social, misspelling the journalist's name. "I said because it is going to be double the size, and the quality of finishes and interiors has been brought to the highest level."

"Also, the column SPAN has been substantially increased for purposes of viewing," he continued. "It is actually under budget and ahead of schedule, as my jobs always are."

Trump added, "It's just much bigger and more beautiful than originally planned. Interestingly, and seldom reported, there are no taxpayer dollars involved. It is being fully paid for by private donations."

The White House initially announced in July that the ballroom, adjacent to the East Wing, would cost $200 million. The price increased in short time, with the president saying it would cost $300 million. A White House official told ABC News in late October that it would cost $350 million.

Though Trump previously said the construction would not interfere with the existing buildings, the project generated controversy after the entire East Wing was demolished in October. ...


#14 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-06 02:46 PM | Reply

@#14

More from that article ...

... The donor list prompted concern from lawmakers. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and 10 other Democrats sent letters to the various companies questioning if there were "any potential quid-pro-quo arrangement" related to antitrust cases and investigations.

A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll in October found that 56 percent of Americans "somewhat" or "strongly" oppose the robust project. ...


#15 | Posted by LampLighter at 2025-12-06 02:57 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort