Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Tuesday, January 13, 2026

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Tuesday in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., which challenge laws that reserve women's and girls' sports divisions in government schools exclusively for females. The great majority of Americans recognize that because men are generally far taller, heavier, faster and stronger than women, co-ed competition is unfair in most sports. But more is at stake than fairness. Those same physical differences mean that allowing male bodies on the court with girls or women is dangerous. We don't allow children to play contact sports with adults because of the obvious physical risk. Similarly, though some variability exists within the male and female pools, the normal range of physical traits differs so widely between the sexes that allowing men to compete in women's sports will inevitably expose women to a heightened risk of physical harm.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Sporting injury often results from collisions between players or between a player and rapidly moving object. In collisions, both mass and speed matter, and males are, on average, substantially faster and heavier than comparably fit and trained females.

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

How would you know? They wouldn't let you be manager, let alone play, chumper.

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-01-13 03:16 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

Wake me up the first time you ever make a contributory comment, LGH.

#2 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-13 04:22 PM | Reply

2. Wake us back up when you stop stealing Boaz's trademarked topics and capitalization.

LYD seems to have a much better grasp on what's happening in the US than you do, BR.

I don't see him posting articles that affect a minuscule portion of the nation's population, while defending what's happening in real life for millions.

Do us all a favor. Post your latest barbecue fantasy. Regain a shred of cred.

#3 | Posted by Dbt2 at 2026-01-13 08:59 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

#3. It's a case currently being litigated in front of SCOTUS.

As public opinion has turned big time on this issue the supporters of this insanity want to quietly sweep it under the rug and have it continue. Nope. Too bad for you.

#4 | Posted by BellRinger at 2026-01-13 09:06 PM | Reply

#4 Funny how public opinion never seems to matter to these vermin when it comes to, oh, say guns, ICE murders, and Trump.

Then it is "fake."

Or simply ignored.

#5 | Posted by A_Friend at 2026-01-13 09:12 PM | Reply

I owe the whole world a Trillion dollars. I bet that much this was a Boaz thread. Boy was I wrong. Oh well

#6 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-01-13 09:16 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort