Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, February 28, 2026

NASA on Friday announced an abrupt change to its pathway to getting astronauts back on the lunar surface, opting to add in an additional crewed test flight before attempting to land.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Nasa announces Artemis III mission no longer aims to send humans to moon

[image or embed]

-- The Guardian (@theguardian.com) Feb 27, 2026 at 2:39 PM

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Are technical issues slowing things down?

#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-02-27 03:54 PM | Reply

"NASA"

#2 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-27 03:55 PM | Reply

Since the mid 70s unmanned exploratory missions have overwhelmingly been the most successful NASA projects.

#3 | Posted by ExpectingReign at 2026-02-27 04:14 PM | Reply

Are technical issues slowing things down?
#1 | Posted by LampLighter

I know they recently delayed the launch of Artemis II due to fuel leaks during a test.

Sounds like subcontractors aren't doing a good job of fulfilling their end of the bargain.

It also seems ambitious to go from unmanned launch to manned lunar orbit to lunar landing. I'm surprised they aren't modeling this program off of Apollo where it was very incremental to ensure the next required step of the process could be done successfully before moving on to the next stage. An assumption of proficiency because it succeeded 50+ years ago seems wildly irresponsible.

#4 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-27 05:36 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Fun fact. Apollo 10's mission was to fly low over the lunar surface and then ascend to rendezvous with the command module. The LM was intentionally underfueled to ensure the crew wouldn't go for a landing since at their lowest they were only a couple dozen kilometers from the surface and NASA was afraid the competitive and daring nature of the guys flying the missions would make it too tempting. So, the guys on 10 had a choice: mission as planned and go home or deviate, land and stay.

#5 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-27 05:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Must've been Navy pilots

#6 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-02-28 02:20 AM | Reply

I think most of them were, actually.

#7 | Posted by jpw at 2026-02-28 10:23 AM | Reply

We should have had a scientific research base there decades ago, best built underground

#8 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-03-01 05:20 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

We should have had a scientific research base there decades ago

This is the funniest comment I've read you post.

I guess this is what happened when you try to think for yourself.

What a moron.

#9 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-03-01 05:21 PM | Reply

>Roadmap to the Moon
pfft
hey canada
ngmi

#10 | Posted by john_savage2 at 2026-03-01 06:20 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort