DoJ Admits Gov Has No Evidence In J Powell Investigation

Friday, March 27, 2026

An attorney from the Jeanine Pirro led DC United States Attorney office admitted in federal court that the DoJ has no evidence to support a subpoena request sought against Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for possibly making false statements to the Senate Banking Committee.

Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 02:32 PM | 8 COMMENTS | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

When asked what false statements Powell is suspected of making, Deputy US Attorney Andrew Massucco replied "Well, we don't know." Then when asked what evidence the DoJ has to support an investigation into fraud or misconduct, Massucco replied "we do not know at this time."

It appears they are launching a criminal probe for no other reason than Powell disagrees with Trump on lowering interest rates.

#1 | Posted by johnny_hotsauce at 2026-03-27 02:42 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

@#1 ... It appears they are launching a criminal probe for no other reason than Powell disagrees with Trump on lowering interest rates. ...

Agreed.

#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-03-27 02:54 PM | Reply

I wonder when Ballwasher will show up to chirp about lawfare...

#3 | Posted by jpw at 2026-03-27 03:45 PM | Reply

"If there is a neck, there is a collar"
Russian proverb

#4 | Posted by Doc_Sarvis at 2026-03-27 03:54 PM | Reply

BALLWASHER IS NOTHING BUT A MAGAT COWARD

#5 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-03-27 05:12 PM | Reply

Political persecution of his enemies is SO Trumpish.

He'll take whatever pound of flesh he can get from anyone who dares to oppose his magnificence.

And Trumpers love him for that.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2026-03-27 05:17 PM | Reply

They always accuse the Democrats of what they are going to do.
They do it to "normalize" the abnormal and immoral.
They do it so they can point at the non-existent example of the Democrats doing it.
They point so they can say they'r'e no different than the Democrats.

All of it is a lie.
Every last part.

#7 | Posted by YAV at 2026-03-27 05:22 PM | Reply

Then when asked what evidence the DoJ has to support an investigation into fraud or misconduct, Massucco replied "we do not know at this time."

This is like when a cop stops you and asks for ID.

And you ask what's your reasonable articulable suspicion that I committed any crime.

And the cop says that's what I'm investigating, and I need your ID, and you're obstructing an official investigation if you don't comply.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-03-27 05:40 PM | Reply