More from the article ...

... The FAA said its new target is 12,563 certified controllers, down from 14,633. A National Academies of Sciences report last year said overtime costs for air traffic controllers, have jumped by more than 300% since 2013 to over $200 million, citing a misallocated workforce and inefficient scheduling.

The report said the time controllers spend on position managing air traffic has declined despite a 4% increase in traffic. It added it could increase time on position from around four hours per shift to more than five hours.

The FAA said "deploying modern staffing models and scheduling tools will improve controller staffing efficiency and reduce the need for excessive overtime."

The FAA said as of April, approximately 11,000 certified controllers are deployed across more than 300 FAA air traffic facilities, with an additional 4,000 controllers in the training pipeline, including 1,000 who were previously a fully certified controller but are now training at new air traffic control facilities. ...

@#1 ... The FAA said "deploying modern staffing models and scheduling tools will improve controller staffing efficiency and reduce the need for excessive overtime." ...

Stated differently, reducing overtime costs is OK even if more plane accidents occur.

Is Pres Trump just trying to cover the FAA costs, in order to pay for his ballroom and arch?

What, exactly seems to be the goal here?

Reducing the number of air traffic controllers? Reducing costs? Or providing better airline safety?

If the latter, I see a flaw in the plan.

Reducing the number of controllers vs reducing the need for those controllers/

How do those two timelines match up?