Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Saturday, July 18, 2026

Climate lawsuits seeking massive damages from fossil fuel companies increasingly hinge on the question: how reliably can scientists pin specific extreme weather to human-caused climate change?

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

Climate lawsuits seeking massive damages from fossil fuel companies increasingly hinge on this question: how reliably can scientists pin specific extreme weather events to human-caused climate change? u.afp.com/Sr3L

[image or embed]

-- AFP News Agency (@en.afp.com) 8:00 PM · Jul 16, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Entitled "Attribution of Extreme Weather and Climate Events and their Impacts," the 254-page paper updates a 2016 assessment by the same institutions, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM).

"Significant progress has been made over the last decade, with major advancements in methods and modeling that allow for more robust assessments of extreme events," said James Hurrell, a professor of atmospheric science at Colorado State University and chair of the committee that wrote the report.

Operating under a charter signed in 1863 by president Abraham Lincoln, the prestigious Academies are independent nonprofit institutions tasked with advising the government on scientific policy.

But these are no ordinary times under the administration of President Donald Trump, who has attacked the very idea that burning fossil fuels is warming the planet.

-- Getting specific --

Scientists have no such doubts. They have known for decades that climate change is altering the frequency and intensity of several types of extreme weather events, including hurricanes, heat waves and extreme rainfall.

But the field of attribution science allows them to move beyond detecting broad trends to investigating individual events -- what the authors call extreme event attribution (EEA) -- which can provide vital information to policymakers.

EEA studies compare an event's characteristics, such as its probability and intensity in the current climate, to a "counterfactual" world without human-caused emissions. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-07-17 07:45 PM | Reply

how reliably can scientists pin specific extreme weather to human-caused climate change?

Posted by LampLighter at 02:32 PM | 1 COMMENT | permalink | Comment on This Entry |

Apparently not too specific. Seems they'd already be filing the lawsuits.

bUH 99% oF ClImAtE $cIeNtIsTs aGrEe!!!

-Dorky

#2 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-18 03:15 PM | Reply

"Apparently not too specific. Seems they'd already be filing the lawsuits."

Lawsuits for what?
It's illegal to warm the globe now?

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 03:18 PM | Reply

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 03:18 PM | Reply | Flag:

You poor little bastard... Is it illegal to cool the globe?

#4 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-18 03:41 PM | Reply

An Exxon study done in 1982 focused on global warming caused by increasing carbon emissions. Remarkably, thirty-seven years ago Exxon accurately predicted that by 2019, the earth would hit a carbon dioxide concentration of 415 ppm and a temperature increase of almost 1 degree C. www.forbes.com

Exxon's Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels' Role in Global Warming Decades Ago
Top executives were warned of possible catastrophe from greenhouse effect, then led efforts to block solutions.
insideclimatenews.org

Was Exxon lying when they determined CO2 causes global warming?

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 03:51 PM | Reply

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 03:51 PM | Reply | Flag:

OMG!!! from 1982!!!

And no democrat did anything!?!?

#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-18 03:56 PM | Reply

And no democrat did anything!?!?
#6 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Reagan was President at the time.
Al Gore's movie came later.
You didn't believe Al Gore, even though Exxon did in 1982.
Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 04:00 PM | Reply

Reagan was President at the time.
Al Gore's movie came later.
You didn't believe Al Gore, even though Exxon did in 1982.
Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 04:00 PM | Reply | Flag

And no Democrat had both houses and the Executive branch since? STFU loser... go back on sabbatical. maybe hit the sweat lodge for a week or two.

#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-18 04:11 PM | Reply

Obama was the biggest friend oil companies as they started fracking operations.

#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-18 04:11 PM | Reply

Obama was the biggest friend oil companies as they started fracking operations.
#9 | Posted by lfthndthrds

Until Trump.

Did Obama do anything that was likewise friendly to alternative energy sources that aren't fossil fuel based?
Did Trump?

#10 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 04:12 PM | Reply

And no Democrat had both houses and the Executive branch since? STFU loser... go back on sabbatical. maybe hit the sweat lodge for a week or two.
#8 | Posted by lfthndthrds

And Democrats rolled out a lot of green energy policies.
And then your boy Trump has been actively cancelling them.
Killing projects already approved and already poured billions of dollars into them.

What's up with that?
Why is alternative energy bad, do you think windmills cause cancer too, like Trump says?

#11 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 04:14 PM | Reply

"Who do you think is right, you or Exxon in 1982?"

^
You couldn't answer because you're afraid to.

#12 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-07-18 04:15 PM | Reply

Desperation is in the air...

#13 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-07-18 04:18 PM | Reply

No, he's correct.

You stupid f*^%s repeat the propaganda the companies told you despite knowing that their own internal reports knew global warming was a thing.

Even when they admit it, you still uncritically repeat the debunked talking points.

#14 | Posted by jpw at 2026-07-18 04:38 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort