Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Friday, October 02, 2026

Florida cops are facing questions after a mandate to remove all Flock cameras tracking cars on St. Lucie County roads led local police to uncover more than a dozen suspicious cameras operating without permits.

More

Alternate links: Google News | Twitter

In Florida, police have repeatedly been caught misusing Flock cameras, sometimes tracking single cars hundreds of times for personal reasons: arstechnica.visitlink.me/ZQH463

[image or embed]

-- Ars Technica (@arstechnica.com) 10:35 AM · Oct 2, 2026

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article ...

... Of the 14 cameras found, 11 had no obvious owners, raising concerns about who has access to sensitive data that bad actors could abuse. After the cameras were discovered, St. Lucie County Commissioner James Clasby told a local news outlet that there's "potential for non-law enforcement to have cameras out there, and I'm not OK with that."

But the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office ended up claiming three of those cameras, then refused to explain why they never obtained the required permits. The office did not immediately respond to Ars' request to clarify whether it ever accessed data recorded by the cameras.

In Florida, police have repeatedly been caught misusing Flock cameras, sometimes tracking single cars hundreds of times for personal reasons. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-02 02:25 PM | Reply

There's a lot Florida doesn't know.

#2 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-10-02 03:47 PM | Reply

Ask Israel, maybe they know, having been involved in "training" hundreds of officers and agents employed in Florida's law enforcement apparatus.

Nearly 20,000 Floridians are also Israeli citizens.

#3 | Posted by pumpkinhead at 2026-10-02 04:34 PM | Reply

Why should anyone believe a word Florida cops say?

#4 | Posted by qcp at 2026-10-02 05:28 PM | Reply

Take them down and see if anyone claims them.

#5 | Posted by morris at 2026-10-02 10:25 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Now.we have copycat flocks.

#6 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-10-03 07:56 AM | Reply

I know how to find out who owns them.

#7 | Posted by lfthndthrds at 2026-10-03 09:41 AM | Reply

BWAHAHA. Sure, pal. You can't find your ass with both hands, you drooling trisomy bitch.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-10-03 03:32 PM | Reply

And then there's things like this ...

Surveillance Company Tells Cops It Wants to Add Facial Recognition to Flock Cameras
www.404media.co

... As Flock continues to be the center of a nationwide conversation about automatic license plate reading cameras, the company has said that it doesn't, and won't, do facial recognition: "We will not add facial recognition to our devices," Flock CEO Garrett Langley said in a recent video. But other, third-party companies are telling cops that they are willing to add facial recognition to data gathered by Flock cameras in order to "close that gap."

A company called VIDIZMO is advertising the capability to export footage from FlockOS to its own platforms that do facial recognition, behavior prediction, and racial and gender analysis on live camera feeds. VIDIZMO is a several decades-old video analysis and database company that has started offering facial recognition technology to cops within the last six months. In a May email to Johnson City, Tennessee, deputy police chief Michael Adams, a salesperson from VIDIZMO wrote that the company's product could do facial recognition on both Flock and Axon data in "one searchable platform." ...


#9 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-03 11:04 PM | Reply

@#9 ... A company called VIDIZMO is advertising the capability to export footage from FlockOS to its own platforms that do facial recognition, behavior prediction, and racial and gender analysis on live camera feeds. ...

So the video that Flock obtains now seems to be used in other ways?

#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-10-03 11:05 PM | Reply

The following HTML tags are allowed in comments: a href, b, i, p, br, ul, ol, li and blockquote. Others will be stripped out. Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

Anyone can join this site and make comments. To post this comment, you must sign it with your Drudge Retort username. If you can't remember your username or password, use the lost password form to request it.
Username:
Password:

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort