Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Wednesday, November 04, 2026

Prospective speaker of the House Hakeem Jeffries on Wednesday hailed the "American tsunami" of Democratic victories in US congressional elections that handed the party control of both chambers of Congress.

"It wasn't simply a blue wave. It was an American tsunami," Jeffries, who is poised to become the first Black person to lead the House when the new Congress convenes in January, told a news conference.

"We're humbled by the outcome," Jeffries said, vowing to "fight hard for every single American, wherever you may reside."

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

"Appearing earlier in the day on "Morning Joe" on the liberal MS Now network, the House minority leader called the result a repudiation of President Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement.

However, the Brooklyn Democrat said his party would focus not on retribution but on fulfilling its promise to lower the prices of groceries, gas, housing and health care.

"The American people don't want us to get even," said Jeffries, who succeeded Nancy Pelosi as House minority leader in 2023.

"They want us to get things done on their behalf. Because life is way too expensive. We ran on affordability. We won on affordability. And now it's our job to govern on affordability."

"It's important for the president, before we even cross over into the new Congress, to end this war in Iran," he said.

Amid numerous allegations of financial impropriety during Trump's presidency, from his cryptocurrency venture to insider trading, Jeffries warned: "There's a cost to corruption."

"When it comes to the accountability side of the equation, it's going to be our responsibility to follow the facts, apply the law, be guided by the Constitution, let the chips fall where they may, and make sure that wrongdoers are being held accountable."

;;

MABA!@ Make America Blue Again!

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2026-11-04 08:55 PM | Reply

Screw Jeffries and Schumer. We need new leadership.

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-11-05 04:44 PM | Reply

Schumer and Jeffries need to be pushed out.

#3 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2026-11-05 05:55 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Next step, WAVE goodbye to Schumer and Jeffries.

#4 | Posted by morris at 2026-11-05 07:11 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Corky, what do you think, should Jeffries and Schumer step aside?

They both have the special interest money stink all over them.

Nobody wants the Old Guard democrats. Personally, I thought Nancy Pelosi was great -- but that era of politics has ended, and there's no going back to "Business As Usual" if Democrats want to win in 2028.

#5 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-11-05 08:37 PM | Reply

Hakeem Jeffries, with his closed door meeting with Jared Kushner?.

Skeletor looking, AIPAC funded, Israel first mother ------.

He's a republican in democratic garb.

#6 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-11-05 08:45 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

should Jeffries and Schumer step aside?

Schumer should retire and Jeffries should run as a republican.

#7 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-11-05 08:51 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

Schumer should retire and Jeffries should run as a republican.

Posted by ClownShack at 2026-11-05 08:51 PM |

Schumer is useless. I can't believe he is still the minority leader. He should have been pushed out long ago.

#8 | Posted by LauraMohr at 2026-11-05 09:19 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1

- Corky, what do you think, should Jeffries and Schumer step aside?

I think that all Dems should sign onto a Pledge to support a War on Citizens United and all such big money in politics Laws (also to promote Universal Healthcare and Education!) or get the F out of the way.

#9 | Posted by Corky at 2026-11-05 09:45 PM | Reply

I Know Who Trump's Going to Fire in MAGA Massacre | Inside Trump's Head

www.youtube.com

#10 | Posted by Corky at 2026-11-05 09:50 PM | Reply

...

"FUNNY"

#11 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-11-05 11:13 PM | Reply

Schumer is useless. I can't believe he is still the minority leader. He should have been pushed out long ago.

#8 | Posted by LauraMohr

The only reason he occupies his position is that he controls distribution of campaign donations to Senate Dem Campaign Committee. He's the $$ conduit from Wall St and AIPAC.

#12 | Posted by morris at 2026-11-06 02:22 AM | Reply

Schumer is useless. I can't believe he is still the minority leader. He should have been pushed out long ago.

By who? Who are you suggesting run against Schumer? Put that candidate forward and the Senate can vote on them. It only takes a vote.

A candidate only needs to win a simple majority of the votes from their own party members (and any independent senators who caucus with that party) to become their party's leader in the Senate.

#13 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-11-06 10:44 AM | Reply

Warren

#14 | Posted by fresno500 at 2026-11-06 01:43 PM | Reply | Newsworthy 1


And no doubt that Chuck Schumer (D-Israel) and Hakeem Jeffries (D-Israel) will face primary challenges from Zohran Mamdani-endorsed NYC Democrats in the future.

#15 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2026-11-06 01:58 PM | Reply

Jefferies is already pushing the "we need to look forward" tone.

I am sure that was the discussion with Jared when they met.

Oh....no....nonono.

We aren't forgetting anything the crime family has done.

The voters have demanded investigations into every dollar of corruption, every criminal act, etc.

All of it.

They need to be held accountable for all of it.

The billions transferred to the bored of peace.
Jareds billion in bribes
The sellout of Ukraine
The billions stolen by ICE

ALL OF IT.

#16 | Posted by Nixon at 2026-11-06 01:59 PM | Reply

"Jefferies is already pushing the "we need to look forward" tone."

Of course he is.

Stopping your house from getting robbed any more is a forward-looking move.

#17 | Posted by snoofy at 2026-11-06 06:03 PM | Reply

#16, #17

"We aren't forgetting anything the crime family has done."

"Jefferies is already pushing the "we need to look forward" tone."

Sometimes looking or actually moving forward involves seriously kicking some miscreant ass.

Thank you for you attention to this matter....

#18 | Posted by South_American at 2026-11-06 11:51 PM | Reply

Speaking of tsunamis guess you all forgot about how bad this one was...

AI Overview

During his two midterm elections, President Barack Obama's party lost seats in both the House of Representatives and the Senate:

2010 Midterms (First Term):
House: Democrats lost a net of 63 seats (dropping from 257 to 194).
Senate: Democrats lost a net of 6 seats (though they maintained a majority
2014 Midterms (Second Term): House: Democrats lost a net of 13 seats.

Senate: Democrats lost a net of 9 seats, allowing Republicans to take control of the chamber

#19 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-11-07 02:12 PM | Reply

A little more info for you concerning mid-terms:

scontent.ftpa1-1.fna.fbcdn.net

#20 | Posted by MSgt at 2026-11-07 02:37 PM | Reply | Funny: 1

@#19 ... During his two midterm elections, President Barack Obama's party lost seats in both the House of Representatives and the Senate ...

In 2010, then Pres Obama acknowledged his loss ...

Obama Humbled By Election 'Shellacking' (November 2010)
www.npr.org

... A sober President Obama acknowledged Wednesday that he took "a shellacking" in the midterm election and that his once highflying relationship with the American voter had hit rocky times.

"There is an inherent danger in being in the White House and being in the bubble," said the president, whose party on Tuesday lost control of the House in a historic Republican wave. The GOP is expected to gain at least 60 seats, the biggest increase in more than seven decades. Democrats barely clung to their Senate majority.

"The responsibilities of this office are so enormous," Obama said, that "sometimes we lose track of the ways that we connected with folks that got us here in the first place."

Working With Republicans

The president, who drew comparisons with midterm losses suffered by presidents Reagan and Clinton during their first terms, pledged to work with GOP leaders on issues ranging from tax cuts to modest forward movement on energy policy, ...


A different approach than Pres Trump seems to be taking ...


#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-11-07 02:42 PM | Reply

Obama lost Democratic seats in conservative districts that had voted for democrats as a rebuke of George BushJr.

Trump lost Texas.

It's not the same.

#22 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-11-07 02:49 PM | Reply

... and Pres W. Bush ...

Bush takes blame for GOP election losses (November 2006)
www.cnn.com

... President Bush on Wednesday took responsibility for his party's losses on Election Night and said he is willing to work with congressional Democrats on the major issues during the last two years of his presidency.

"I'm obviously disappointed with the outcome of the election and, as the head of the Republican Party, I share a large part of the responsibility," Bush said during a East Room news conference at the White House.

"I told my party's leaders that it is now our duty to put the elections behind us and work together with the Democrats and independents on the great issues facing this country." (Read a transcript of Bush's comments)

On Tuesday, Democrats picked up at least 28 seats in the House of Representatives, giving them control of the chamber for the first time since the Republican sweep in the 1994 midterm elections. (Full story)

Bush said he had called Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who is expected to become the first female speaker of the House when the new Congress begins in January, and the Senate's Democratic leader, Harry Reid, and congratulated them on their success Tuesday night. ...



#23 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-11-07 08:10 PM | Reply

Has Pres Trump made such comments?

If not, why not?

#24 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-11-07 08:11 PM | Reply

... and back to the topic of this thread ...

... Prospective speaker of the House Hakeem Jeffries on Wednesday hailed the "American tsunami" of Democratic victories in US congressional elections that handed the party control of both chambers of Congress. ...

All the Democrats have "won" in this election is a rental of the two houses of Congress.

Not long-term ownership of those two houses of Congress.

One question that now lingers for me is the following ...

The Democrats have been able to move a lot of Independents and moderate Republicans to vote for them in this election.

But what will the Democrats do now with that new found support?

Will they do the usual Democratic fumble and seem to actively chase away that new-found support because of progressives?


Or might the Democrats move towards the left-center to maintain that support on a longer term?

The Republicans went full in with MAGA's radical views, and looked what happened to them.

Will Democrats learn from what seems to be so obvious in front of them?

My guess, at this point, they will not learn, and that they will strive to mess up any hope of chances in 2028.

But that is just my opinion.

Will the Democrats show my opinion to be wrong?

Time will tell ...


#25 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-11-07 08:29 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy

Drudge Retort