I can say "Hamas uses human shields", and not care about Israel, and condemn Zionism.

Thank you for playing.

ICC Definition & Legal Framework

Core Act: The intentional use of protected individuals"such as civilians or prisoners of war"to block or deter an enemy attack on specific military targets, zones, or forces.

Protected Status: It applies to people who are otherwise legally protected under international humanitarian law.

Voluntary or Coerced: A person can act as a human shield either by force (involuntarily) or of their own volition (voluntarily), and the prohibition still applies.

Context limitation: Under the current wording of the Rome Statute, this specific war crime is explicitly codified for application during international armed conflicts.

idgaf about Israel.

"Under international humanitarian law (IHL), civilian communities that naturally or historically develop around military bases are not considered "human shields." For a situation to meet the legal definition of human shielding, there must be a specific intent to exploit civilian presence for military advantage."

"Legal scholars often distinguish between active shields and what the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) refers to as "proximate" civilians. These are individuals who simply happen to live or work "too close" to a legitimate military target without any coercive action or deliberate tactical placement taking place. While their proximity dramatically increases their risk during a conflict, they do not automatically fulfill the legal definition of human shields."

"While communities surrounding military bases are not shields, militaries do have a legal obligation under Additional Protocol I (Article 58) to "endeavor to remove the civilian population... from the vicinity of military objectives" and avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas."

"International Criminal Court (ICC): In late 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants for leaders of both Israel and Hamas (including Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif). While the charges against Hamas leaders heavily centered on the October 7 attacks (such as murder, hostage-taking, and sexual violence), subsequent formal complaints have been filed at the ICC by Palestinian civilians from Gaza, urging the court to explicitly prosecute Hamas for utilizing local residents as human shields."

Not to mention all the civilians you're getting killed with it, but they only get to be a footnote in the human shield strategy.

"They're not human shields, even though we're using them as human shields!"
"We don't have a choice but to use human shields!"
-Clown

The problem with your retarded human shield strategy, is that it only works until you escalate with the other side until they didn't it doesn't work anymore.

Right. Human shields.
As for Gaza, it's just a strip, building "military bases" - regardless of where - is gonna be surrounded with

#19 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-09-27 03:35 PM | Reply

Surrounded with != underneath.

You're arguing for the military necessity of human shields. Have fun with that.

When they start building CP's under Walter Reed, you'll be on to something.

Let me break it down to something you and efette can understand.

* People making military base.
* Military people have families.
* Families build communities next to military base.

Contrast with:

* We don't want to get our command center bombed GBU-72.
* So we go where people are already, and build our base under our hospital.
* If somebody blows up our base, they blew up the hospital, and they're the bad guys.

Okay guess you're not smort.

Hamas intentionally builds bases under civilian structures to specifically prevent them from being bombed.

Everywhere else in the world, civilian communities naturally form around military bases.

and when you do it, use Iranian school children instead of America, and think about why they're not human shields.

You're smort. You can figure it out.

No.

Because pretty much every military base has residential areas around it.

Also a common trait in Russians.

Did someone piss in your blue cupboard? :]]

#103 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2026-09-26 09:30 PM | Reply

I'm allergic to snow.

I've also hung out with both Alaskans and Nordic people. It's like hanging out with Marines. They celebrate misery and wear it as a badge of honor.

Was that API advertised or promoted by the website, and used as promoted or advertised?
If yes, then this is not a hack.
If no, then this was a hack.

#21 | Posted by LampLighter at 2026-09-26 07:19 PM | Reply

As somebody that has coded numerous APIs, ones that follow HIPAA best practices, your question is confusing. Start with this one, have you ever used Developer Mode in a web browser and looked at API calls?

There's a fancy resort on the Big Island that has a long hallway filled with art.

#18 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2026-09-25 09:27 PM | Reply

Hilton Waikoloa. Nice, but Fairmont Orchid is nicer.

Like the "Australia hack", the incidents need a lot more context. What really happened? If somebody left all the data exposed on an API, which is what it sounds like, it's not really a hack. All it needed to do was spam GETs within the bounds of rate limiting. APIs don't have to be documented to figure out the endpoints, especially when you have sites showing you exactly what they're doing by just checking off dev mode.

The advent of AI

#9 | Posted by donnerboy at 2026-09-26 12:13 PM | Reply

He means LLMs.

It doesn't use any LLMs.

Rather than relying on a single model type, it uses a multi-layered, integrated AI framework categorized into three specialized branches of machine learning:

1. 4D Spatial-Temporal Digital Twins
2. Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) for Conflict Orchestration
3. Multi-Modal Data Fusion & Predictive Weather Analytics

"Ultimately, SMART is less about a standalone deep learning model architecture and more about an orchestration ecosystem. It feeds specialized spatial-temporal, predictive weather, and reinforcement optimization models into a singular interface, providing instant decision-making options to human operators."

Can't. Democratic socialist governments across Europe means citizens earn a living wage, have health care, weeks of vacation, and don't have to choose between buying medicine or food, for example.

#97 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2026-09-26 11:22 AM | Reply | Flag:

For now. 1% GDP growth, below replacement level birth rates, and a collapse in medical R&D are massive liabilities that will undo what they have now. For democratic socialism to be sustainable you need a 2.1:1 birth rate. The highest is Bulgaria with 1.63, Germany is at 1.36, Spain at 1.10. That's completely incompatible with pay as you go systems. Most of the EU doesn't have sovereign wealth funds, and those that do have finite timelines for resource exploitation to fund everything.

You could just have done any tiny amount of rudimentary web search on the timeline Lamp. The FAA moves at a snails pace, these projects don't appear overnight.