So, then candidate Trump, politics over what is good for the Country.
#129 | Posted by LampLighter

I'm glad this is being brought up again. Because JEFF was hell bent on undermining that legislation with a bunch of BS platitudes regarding why it was, overall, a bad bill regardless of the positive impact it would have at the border. And I'm sure he's still set in that BS platitude to this day.

To draw his weapon.

#68 | Posted by snoofy

Exactly! And was hit by the SUV so hard that he didn't even drop the phone he was filming with! TikTokers are in absolute envy of his skill sets!

#67 | Posted by brass30

The----- in' ---- was in SOOOOO much danger, he didn't even bother to drop his phone! The boot licking narrative being portrayed for this dumb ---- is truly fascinating!

#116 | Posted by BellRinger

They're subject to deportation REGARDLESS!! JFC are you really that dumb?! The difference being whether there's a criminal charge attached to that deportation or not!

Nuance is not your forte, eh cultist!! Another self-own on your part!! GIVE ME MOOOOOOORE!!! HAHAHAHAHA!!!

Do you guys favor any kind of border control at all?
#118 | Posted by BellRinger

Yes. What a silly question! HAHAHAHA! "Open borders crowd..." Complete bull ----. YOU are the one conflating ----. Just stop already. JFC, cultist!

I'm not talking about people who are here on a VISA. Thats another thing the open borders crowd love to do - conflate legal immigration with illegal.
#121 | Posted by BellRinger

I was VERY clear about the context in my post: Undocumented presence. You responded that it's a criminal offense and provided a link covering a different context than that I provided. Why did you do that? IOW, you are flat out wrong. Own it. And while you're at it, work on them reading comprehension skills, eh cultist?!

HAHAHAHAHA!! Nice self-own, JEFF! Keep'em comin'! HAHAHAHA!!

Here's a solution - enter legally. Problem solved.
#113 | Posted by BellRinger

Many did. And that's the context you are now choosing to ignore. JFC, JEFF! You're in a cult! Own it! HAHAHA!

#100. It's actually a crime.
#102 | Posted by BellRinger

That's literally not what your link suggested. Why are you ignoring the context of my post, you cultist?!

"Undocumented presence" is not a criminal offense. Your link shows that crossing the border is criminal offense. I didn't say anything about crossing the border. That was context YOU injected into my post.

Why did you do that? Oh, I get it. Because you're stuck in a cult and are commanded to do so.

That is inhumane.
#108 | Posted by BellRinger

What's inhumane is purposefully making it difficult for these folks to enter in the first place, forcing them into situations where they must choose a viable future while risking being cooked in the back of a truck or die in squaller. People like you are forcing them to make this decision. You better not call yourself a Christian, you dirt rotten cultist!

I did. See 104
#109 | Posted by BellRinger

You're being very specific to those who entered illegally. If that was your salient position in the first place, that would make sense. However, you never made the distinction. You and your cult leader are lumping all undocumented immigrants into one group. People who are simply undocumented, not who entered legally, are not criminals. Until you start making distinctions between these two groups, you look like a god damned fool, you silly cultist!

Swallow it.

It's actually a crime.
#102 | Posted by BellRinger

Link up, cultist!! HAHAHA!!!

Here's my links, just in case you gonna be a------ about it!! HAHAHA!!!!

Nothing more.
#99 | Posted by BellRinger

Nothing at all?! JFC this is what I'm talking about. JFC JEFF, you dumb as ----.

I knew some idiot would play the race card.
#98 | Posted by BellRinger

You earned it, you silly cultist!!! HAHAHA!!! Projection on your part is acknowledged.

Undocumented presence (without an associated entry/reentry crime) is most analogous to a civil traffic infraction: it is a legal violation that government can act on, but it is not itself a crime and is handled in a separate civil system.

Just as some driving behavior elevates a basic traffic infraction into a criminal offense, some immigrationrelated conduct (improper entry or illegal reentry) elevates the situation into criminal prosecution in addition to the underlying civil removability.

Well, since I haven't done that ...
#96 | Posted by BellRinger

Agreed. Finally some evidence that you're not part of the cult. Thanks, JEFF.

JEFF doesn't even realize that US citizens have lost their jobs because they were detained by ICE for hours or even days.

Once again, for cultists like JEFF, the ends justify the means. And he is well aware that his white skin will always protect him from being detained by ICE.

---- in' pathetic.

Violence against ICE is up 1200% year/year.
#161 | Posted by BellRinger

WTF do you think that is? If you think it's slolely because of left-wing violence, you truly are stuck in the cult, JEFF!!! Do you have any idea how much money was pumped into ICE? Do you have any idea how many more ICE agents have been hired? You're not very good with statistics, eh?

JFC

At least you concede this women didn't deserve to be executed, like the rest of your cult are demanding people acknowledge.

Reporting on the second Trump administration notes that, as of October 2025, the federal government was not systematically tracking how many American citizens had been detained or removed in immigration operations, making precise numbers unavailable.