Even Fox News Can't Get Trump to Debate Harris Again

Why would Trump agree at this point? Everyone already knows everything about him and his positions so it would only help to serve Harris, who is dropping very quickly in the betting markets due to people getting to now her and disliking her.

polymarket.com

Also, Fox News suggesting Brett and Martha is a joke. They are not the type of 100% partisan hacks that the Dems put up for the first 2 debates. The equivalent would be Hannity and Tucker "moderating".

The reality is that we have now hit the inflection point. Polls are starting to swing huge for Trump, and reflect internal polls, as the polling agencies need to start to reflect a closer version of the truth or lose their credibility completely. That is why Kamala is so desperate now. Unfortunately for her, she really is not capable clearly articulating any policy other than wanting to kill babies due to her clear mental deficiencies and the underlying fact that Democrats do not have any policies that people actually support.

@#1 .. He is a coward ...

I see nothing about his actions to deny that viewpoint.

That fmr Pres Trump is a coward.

Anyone have a differing opinion?

Whoa, cool tune appeared on a playlist here...

War On Drugs - Thinking Of A Place (2017)
www.youtube.com

It's kinda long (11 minutes or so) But the architecture of the song is great... imo, of course.

He hasn't been campaigning to win for months now. He's been convincing the rubes in his cult that the polls show him leading (or tied), but he knows he's going to lose in a landslide. When he loses in a landslide, he'll claim it's all rigged! and election interference! and immigrants are eating white babies in their satanic voting rituals! and his rubes will then dutifully do whatever he wants them to do. Probably a gravy SEALS takeover of some poor capitol building in rural meaninglesstown America.

"He hasn't been campaigning to win for months now.
...
When he loses in a landslide, he'll claim it's all rigged!
#5 | Posted by chuffy"

I see you are one of those delusional liberals that will be screaming at the scream in impotent rage when Kamala loses. Trump is out on the campaign trail despite Democrats trying to assassinate him twice. As for the polls, yep, they show Trump winning all of the swing states now and likely to get over 300 EVs.

The Democrat plan where they locked the last unfit empty suit in his basement and waited for the MSM to do their thing and prop them up until the election has failed this time. That is why we have this Kamala press disaster tour occurring. And despite sycophants interviewing her and choosing to appear on sex-chat podcasts where she thinks she can really hit home on her main message of 'abortion for -----', it has been an utter disaster. The betting odds are moving fast against her and they more represent the belief that the Dems can still cheat to win vs. her actually having a legitimate shot.

OOOooooo... a new sock puppet! It's been days!

Re: #6

Welcome to the Retort. Thanks for sharing your views on things. You are a $#!+ person.

Re: #4 Lamplighter

I saw the War On Drugs in Milwaukee a couple years ago. Dude's got a thick circle of effects pedals around him. I still prefer his former bandmate Kurt Vile's tunes, but it's close

despite Democrats trying to assassinate him twice.

Both assassins were republicans.

He didn't like both being a meme after and worse - clearly losing. Nobody loves a loser in his book.

"Trump is out on the campaign trail despite Democrats trying to assassinate him twice"

Hitler's (Trump's) own people (Republicans) tried to assassinate him twice.

conOLD is saying, the first thing a person does when they lose is ask for a rematch.

Well, conOLD, a champion doesn't hide from defending their title like you are you ----- ass bitch.

DonOLD COWard. You ------- MAGAT dope

#14 | Posted by commnotes at 2024-10-11 02:01 PM | Reply | Flag: | Flag: MAGAt truth

Right. A couple of disappointed Trumpers want to blow Trump's brains out and Democrats get blamed for it by the "they're eating the dogs" idiots.

The collective IQ of MAGA nation is well below room temperature.

Why would Trump ever waste his time debating an historically incompetent cackling woman just because she claims to be black? Ohh and she has a black ex POTUS with multiple mansions touting her only because she claims to be black but clueless.

"A couple of disappointed Trumpers want to blow Trump's brains out and Democrats get blamed for it by the "they're eating the dogs" idiots.
#17 | Posted by anton"

Democrats would claim the assassins as their own if they had been successful. But, as they are liberals and fail at everything in life, they couldn't shoot straight. As such, the libs needs to try to make their Blackrock tied incels into Trump supporters despite all the evidence pointing to them being incel lib losers. I guess we just wait on the next MSNBC brainwashed incel to make their move.

"historically incompetent cackling woman just because she claims to be black?
#18 | Posted by Robson"

Stop doubting with her 'blackness'. I saw her picture with the helper that she claimed to be her grandmother despite Grandma Iris being dead for years before the picture was taken. She is every bit as black at Rachel Dolezal or Shaun King.

Scatberg, the shooter in Pennsylvania was a repug incel like yourself.

"But, as they are liberals..."

What a riot.

The guy in the bushes had been writing Nikki Haley, begging her to take Vivek as a VP choice so Trump would lose.

Your desperation is palpable.

#19

A Democrat lunatic didn't miss Steve Scalise. That lunatic belongs in jail, just like the one surviving disappointed MAGAt who never got a shot off at Trump.it's easy not to be a partisan hack humanoid. Give it a try sometime.

#20 | Posted by deadman | Flag: Interesting POV by "deadman"

"#22 | Posted by Danforth"

He was your guy, not in the GOP.

www.factcheck.org

"According to public records, Routh voted in the Democratic primary in North Carolina in March. North Carolina allows unaffiliated voters to choose which party's primary to vote in, but those voters can participate in only one primary election.

For most of the time Routh was registered to vote, he didn't make contributions to federal campaigns, according to Federal Election Commission records. But, starting in 2019, Routh began making modest donations " totaling about $140 " to support Democrats."

" According to public records, Routh voted in the Democratic primary"

It's not unusual for someone to try to influence the opposing party's primary. Meanwhile, he was writing to Nikki Haley about choosing Vivek; I'd put that at a much higher level than voting in a primary, especially after the Republican nominee was a fait accompli.

Hell, Haley didn't even win her home state.

re: #26 Danforth

Stop getting in front of the idiot racist's lies

"But, starting in 2019, Routh began making modest donations"

Yeah...back when you could charge less than the processing fee.

"totaling about $140"

So...less than six dollars a month?!?

Again, I'd put writing Haley with specific running-mate advice at a higher commitment level.

Speaking of Fox News, the Trump campaign has accused Fox News of participating in disseminating 'propaganda' because they covered the White House press briefing on the government's responses to Hurricanes Helene and Milton. You notice that every time Fox News does something 'normal', like covering this emergency response press briefing, interviewing someone who's NOT a Trump supporter, running a political advert for a Democrat or covering a news item which does NOT show Biden or Harris in a bad light, Trump goes crazy and accuses the network of being unpatriotic or worse. It's because Trump knows that members of his 'base' watch Fox News, often it's the only media outlet that they're getting their news from, and he doesn't want them to hear anything that does not directly help him. He's admitted that he doesn't really care what they say about him on CNN or MSNBC because no one watches those networks, no one that is who might support him. But Fox News, that's a whole different kettle of fish.

OCU

""totaling about $140"
#28 | Posted by Danforth"

That is not a very good deflection. You should have gone with: "That wasn't even his money! That was ActBlue farming money through his account without his knowledge". Would have been more believable.

"Speaking of Fox News, the Trump campaign has accused Fox News of participating in disseminating 'propaganda'
#29 | Posted by OCUser"

In case you missed it, Fox News has not been a pro-GOP channel since W Bush. They actually have independents and left wingers that routinely bash Trump including former top "talent" like Chris Wallace. You can listen to unhinged TDS leftwingers like Jessica Tarlov, Juan Williams and Harold Ford Jr.

The Left doesn't get this because you demand purity echo chambers. So, there is no dissenting voice on MSNBC, CNN, or NPR. It is 100% leftwing nutjobs.

So, when Trump says that Fox is doing propaganda for Kamala, it is because that is exactly what they are doing. Exactly the same as when they buried Hunter's laptop story last election.

BTW, I just saw that this weekend a story may drop about Walz molesting one of his former students. We will see if the allegations are true but his mannerisms sure point to the story being plausible.

"That is not a very good deflection."

Who's deflecting? The guy wrote to Nikki Haley, giving advice on how to stop Trump.

Seems you're in denial.

" I just saw that this weekend a story..."

What a riot.

Last time around it was about eating the dogs, eating the cats. Clearly, morons will fall for anything.

And are you planning an apology when that pans out like a Comer/Jordan whistleblower?

" BTW, I just saw that this weekend a story may drop about Walz molesting one of his former students."

Where did you see that?

"The guy wrote to Nikki Haley, giving advice on how to stop Trump.
#32 | Posted by Danforth"

Yeah, that was the standard Democrat playbook:

www.wsj.com

But, does not explain Democrat party donations, which is why you should have gone with the deflection I offered.

"Democrat party donations"

Amounts at barely at or under minimum fees?

You're either joking, or a joke.

How many letters have YOU written to your opposition candidates?

Routh voted for Epstein's wingman in 2016. His own voters want him dead.

"Last time around it was about eating the dogs, eating the cats.
#33 | Posted by Danforth"

Clearly you are a MSNBC echo chamber type of guy as there are videos all over along with 911 calls supporting this.

How about this - the Springfield manager admitting he was informed as well.
thepostmillennial.com

How about this one:
www.youtube.com

Classic liberal game of adding in 'credible' into factchecks so that they can discount that they have, in fact, occurred. Similar to how how 'no election fraud' to 'no widespread election fraud' was used in their 'factchecks'.

"Amounts at barely at or under minimum fees?
How many letters have YOU written to your opposition candidates?
#36 | Posted by Danforth"

How much did he donate to Trump?

As I said above, a lot of emptyheaded Dems supported Haley because, despite being emptyheaded liberals, they knew that Joe Biden had no chance of beating Trump. I already gave you the documentation above for that. Now, explain the donations. He was one of yours. He couldn't shoot straight because their is nothing straight about the Democrat party at this point.

Clearly you are a MSNBC echo chamber type of guy as there are videos all over along with 911 calls supporting this

You are just lying now. Even DeWine has said that these claims are bogus.

"How much did he donate to Trump?"

The Republican who wanted to assassinate him?!?

"a lot of emptyheaded Dems supported Haley"

Find one who wrote Nimrata with advice regarding Vivek.

"He was one of yours."

I'm not a Democrat, nor have I ever been. Today's Republicans don't hold a candle to the Jack Danforths of the world.

As usual, folks like you have nothing for non-partisans.

" Similar to how how 'no election fraud"..."

AT SCALE.

Why be such a coward you have to leave out the salient part?

Are you too stupid to know the difference, or do you believe the folks you're trying to gaslight are too stupid to know the difference?

Ignorant, or malevolent?

"Even DeWine has said that these claims are bogus.
#40 | Posted by Alexandrite"

You are lying now - or, you have seen the proof and are too TDS to accept it. MSN has accepted it.

www.msn.com

If you want another source, here IS THE ACTUAL AUDIO OF THE CALL. Now, you can claim:

1.) the police did not verify it
2.) the caller was making things up

But, YOU CANNOT claim that 911 calls were not received. That would be a 100% lie.

www.realclearpolitics.com

"I'm not a Democrat, nor have I ever been.
#41 | Posted by Danforth"

Sure you aren't. Just like you are not gay despite all those -------- you gave in the past. Keep telling yourself that Sparky.

Gee, the new guy seems a lot like the closeted banned guy.

Some folks just can't take a hint.

"AT SCALE.
#42 | Posted by Danforth"

You just agreed with my point but are too stupid to even realize it.

"YOU CANNOT claim that 911 calls were not received."

As if that was the barometer for truth or lie.

Sometimes, the comedy writes itself!

You just agreed with my point but are too stupid to even realize it.

It's your point that's stupid.

""YOU CANNOT claim that 911 calls were not received."
#47 | Posted by Danforth"

When the claim being made is "911 received a call about migrants killing geese" that is the exact ------- barometer. Either a call was received OR a call was not received. In this case, a call WAS received, thus, THIS IS TRUE. Inserting other nonsense like 'did the police confirm it' or 'was the call credible' is not something relevant to the discussion of whether or not this call was made. Try again loser.

"You just agreed with my point "

That there is garden-variety fraud?!? OF COURSE THERE IS. You just agreed with my LARGER point.

The Heritage Foundation has a compendium of the last 25+ years of voter fraud convictions. NOTHING AT SCALE.

"When the claim being made is "911 received a call about migrants killing geese""

And it turned out it was a white guy, who killed two geese.

Regardless, a minor violation, anywhere. No eating the dogs, no eating the cats. Just racist dog whistles.

"...a call WAS received, thus, THIS IS TRUE. Inserting other nonsense like 'did the police confirm it' or 'was the call credible' is not something relevant"

The truth doesn't matter, just the accusation?!?

THAT'S THE DUMBEST THING EVER.

Feel free to die on that hill.

"And it turned out it was a white guy, who killed two geese.
#51 | Posted by Danforth"

Again, this is immaterial to whether a call was received. Now, give the link to it being a white guy that killed the geese in this case so you can redeem a small bit of face.

#43

You're a lying POS troll, why not disappear from whatever sewer or troll farm you came from. The story about the geese isn't from MSN, it's from Western Journal.

Ad Fontes Media rates Western Journal in the Hyper-Partisan Right category of bias and as Unreliable, Problematic in terms of reliability. Western Journal is an online publication that presents news, commentary and analysis. Its mission is to focus on topics "that Heartland Americans care about" and "upholds traditional Christian values as articulate in the Bible." The Journal, based in Phoenix, Arizona, includes content from Conservative Tribune, Liftable and The Wildcard. Founded in 2009 as Western Journalism, a project of the Western Center for Journalism, it is now owned by Liftable Media, funded by Floyd Brown, who also created the Political Action Committee, Citizen United.

The following are the overall bias and reliability scores for Western Journal according to our Ad Fontes Media ratings methodology.

Reliability: 21.77

Bias: 19.53

adfontesmedia.com

Western Journal " Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source.

Overall, we rate Western Journal Right Biased and Questionable based on story selection and editorial opinions that strongly favor the right and numerous failed fact checks.

mediabiasfactcheck.com

The only thing the Western Journal is good for is lining the bird cages of parrots suffering from diarrhea. Don't waste your time with this fool Danforth, he simply isn't worth it.