Tuesday, May 27, 2025

10 Shot Following Altercation at S Carolina Boat Gathering

Ten people were shot and at least one other person was injured when a holiday weekend gathering at a charter boat in a South Carolina coastal community turned violent, according to police.

More

BREAKING | Memorial Day mass shooting in South Carolina beach town injures at least 11 people

[image or embed]

-- The Independent (@the-independent.com) May 25, 2025 at 11:52 PM

Comments

Here's to my Memorial Day "Tots and Pears" salad!

#1 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2025-05-26 10:42 PM

The only thing shocking about this is that the cop admitted he shot himself.

#2 | Posted by qcp at 2025-05-27 10:56 AM

Thanks, Second Amendment!

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-27 11:24 AM

Most American headline ever

#4 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-05-27 12:31 PM

The brain dead------------- promised to end American carnage. Yet another massive failure from Putin's sorry bitch.

#5 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-05-27 01:54 PM

They shoulda had silencers.... but hey, that was some pretty poor marksmanship out there, just sayin'.

#6 | Posted by Corky at 2025-05-27 02:13 PM

And the carnage continues.

#7 | Posted by Hughmass at 2025-05-27 02:26 PM

Re 6

You beat me to it! Great minds think alike.

If they had all used silencers the rest of the boaters could still just vacation on without the annoying interruption of another mass shooting.

#8 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-27 02:40 PM

People used to have fist fights. Now they have gun fights.

#9 | Posted by TenMile at 2025-05-27 02:46 PM

Silencers would help preserve the hearing of hunting dogs. Never understood why they are illegal.

#10 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-27 03:45 PM

#8

More like idiots of a feather flock together. One can't spell and the other is afraid of his own shadow. Neither one of you morons know anything about silencers.

#11 | Posted by willowby at 2025-05-27 05:52 PM

Silencers would help preserve the hearing of hunting dogs. Never understood why they are illegal.

#10 | Posted by visitor_

Add that to the giant pile of simple and obvious things that you don't understand.

#12 | Posted by SpeakSoftly at 2025-05-27 05:57 PM

Explain, if you can.

#13 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-27 07:14 PM

Never understood why they are illegal.

They are not in 42 of 50 states.

#14 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 07:40 PM

Legal if the ATF grants you license after paying a ridiculous tax. It takes months. Biden's ATF regularly rejected applications.

#15 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-27 07:47 PM

Legal if the ATF grants you license after paying a ridiculous tax.

Yes. Legal.

#16 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-27 08:10 PM

Legal if they grant you a license that Biden's ATF won't grant. They're devices to reduce hearing impairment, they shouldn't even be regulated beyond normal consumer protections.

#17 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-28 10:36 AM

Legal if they grant you a license that Biden's ATF won't grant.

So you can't buy a silencer? NSSF says 4.9 million of them have been sold in the US. They are all illegal?

#18 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-28 10:41 AM

10 Shot Following Altercation at S Carolina Boat Gathering

Wasn't it in SC where a tourist bystander that was killed on the first weekend they allowed unlicensed carry in bars or was that GA?

I have trouble keeping all these welfare queen red states straight.

#19 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-05-28 10:52 AM

They're 100% illegal in 8 states. I've stated that their regulation, the license and tax requirements done make sense to me. Does it make sense to you, can you explain? I've never seen a good argument for making silencers difficult to own.

#20 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-28 10:54 AM

Legal if they grant you a license that Biden's ATF won't grant.

There are videos out on Youtube of people that got a license last year and are currently designing their own silencers.

Just another lie.

#21 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-05-28 10:56 AM

They're 100% illegal in 8 states.

That's why I said they are legal in 42 states.

#22 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-05-28 11:02 AM

They're devices to reduce hearing impairment, they shouldn't even be regulated beyond normal consumer protections.

#17 | POSTED BY VISITOR

There are plenty of good hearing protectors on the market.

If guns are too loud for you snowflakes and wearing hearing protection is too hard for you to handle maybe you should find a more quiet hobby. Like gardening or photography or art or raising chickens.

I personally would prefer to know when deadly weapons are being fired in my neighborhood or my vicinity.

#23 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-28 12:48 PM

I personally would prefer to know when deadly weapons are being fired in my neighborhood or my vicinity.

#23 | POSTED BY DONNERBOY

For the vast majority of calibers, you still will even with a suppressor.

They're not like movies ...

#24 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-28 12:59 PM

They're devices to reduce hearing impairment,

Thanks for the laugh.

#25 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-05-28 01:11 PM

#23

Hilarious. The guy who's frightened to death of firearms calling someone else a snowflake.

#26 | Posted by willowby at 2025-05-28 02:00 PM

"The guy who's frightened to death of firearms"

That's not really an accurate statement. I've been to the range.

And my concern about the health risks of firearms isn't a personal health concern. It's a public health concern.

Not sure if you understand what public health is, but if you got your COVID vaccine or your flu shot, then you at least agree in principle with my concern.

#27 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 02:05 PM

"frightened to death of firearms"

Even with your firearms, you're still frightened to death of the government having a list of firearms owners like you.

Unlike you, I'm not afraid of lists.

#28 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 02:08 PM

The guy who's frightened to death of firearms calling someone else a snowflake.

#26 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

Firearms do not frighten me. Are you too frightened to be without one? My preference is a world where I am not FORCED to carry one.

It's lunatics like you who have purposely misinterpreted the intent of the constitution and think everyone should and is qualified to possess firearms that have me concerned.

And if you are too afraid of the noise deadly weapons make when they are fired you should definitely choose another hobby.

#29 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-05-28 02:56 PM

Not to be that guy, but it's not a silencer, it's a suppressor. Depending on the brand and design, and the firearm it's attached to, it reduces the noise around 20-40 decibels, maybe a little more. About what a good pair of ear ----- should do. An AR in 5.56 produces about 150dB at the muzzle, 130 or so effective dB at the ear of the shooter. A good quality suppressor should bring that down to around 100-110. You can get even more noise reduction with larger and longer suppressors, but then you're talking about a can larger than the firearm itself. Subsonic rounds are even quieter, but then you're losing a lot of bullet performance.

As JPW stated, it's not like Hollywood, a suppressed rifle still sounds like a rifle, just 20% or so quieter. Good quality suppressors start around $800 - $1,000 and can go a lot higher, the tax stamp is another $200. Not a big deal if you really feel the need.

Small sample size, but I know a dozen or so people who use them for hunting or the range, I haven't heard of anyone being denied a stamp. People I know who shoot with them are hunters who use them in place of hearing protection when doing a lot of shooting, or to avoid spooking other game when we're hunting. I'm not sure it makes that big a difference to the animals. I've tried one on a .22-250 for coyotes and prairie dogs, the noise reduction is nice but I'd rather not lose the muzzle velocity when I'm shooting at long range. The critters don't seem to react any differently.

If you're looking for hearing protection, in my opinion you'll get much better performance out of a high-quality set of reactive ear-----. They'll cut down the noise of gunfire about 30-40dB, and can be adjusted to still be sensitive to environmental sounds. With a bluetooth enabled set you can even listen to your playlist while you work a prairie dog town or coyote den. And you can get a high quality set for $100 or less. I can see where using a suppressor and ear----- together could reduce heard dB's even more.

#30 | Posted by El_Buscador at 2025-05-28 02:58 PM

*shrug*
What's a few thousand deaths each year from shooting, compared to my FREEDOM to buy as many guns and as many types of guns as I want!
"the thoughts and prayers Party"

#31 | Posted by e1g1 at 2025-05-28 03:08 PM

If you're looking for hearing protection, in my opinion you'll get much better performance out of a high-quality set of reactive earmuffs.

I've bought a set of these for myself, my wife and my son. Not for shooting, but for when we go to shows or something with loud noises (especially for my son) because ambient noise is minimally reduced but loud, sudden noises are suppressed very well. I think the model I bought runs about $75-80 on Amazon.

#32 | Posted by jpw at 2025-05-28 03:12 PM

People can wear hearing protection, but hunting dogs cannot.

#33 | Posted by visitor_ at 2025-05-28 03:34 PM

"People can wear hearing protection, but hunting dogs cannot."

If you want to torture your dogs, that's your choice.
And if we want to judge you for torturing your dogs, that's our choice.

#34 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 03:59 PM

"It's lunatics like you who have purposely misinterpreted the intent of the constitution"

Hand in glove with purposely misrepresenting the reason for gun control is being frightened.

They can only understand fear-based arguments
It's because they live in permanent fear themselves.
That's what the guns are for. Because without their guns, they're afraid.

#35 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 04:02 PM

Hi ------, welcome. Now fcnk off, racist POS

#39 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-05-28 06:45 PM

#30

Don't try to reason with the far left Commucrats on this site. Especially the terrified trio (cornholio,snoofy,donnerboy) when it comes to guns. Anything to do with firearms or their accessories, The three stooges are against.

#40 | Posted by willowby at 2025-05-28 11:00 PM

#34

It's you snoofy who wants to torture his dog. A silencer would alleviate some of the noise. but NOOOO, your fear should prevail.

#41 | Posted by willowby at 2025-05-28 11:41 PM

Where did I say he shouldn't have a silencer, little Willowby?

#42 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 11:42 PM

"A silencer would alleviate some of the noise"

A healthy society would alleviate his need for a gun.

#43 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 11:43 PM

"Anything to do with firearms or their accessories, The three stooges are against."

I'm merely against the right of Nidal Hasan to buy a gun to use it to shoot up Fort Hood.

It's weird to me that you aren't against that.

#44 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 11:44 PM

I'm not against air travel.

I'm against Mohammad Atta being the pilot.

What part of this is so difficult for you to understand?

#45 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-05-28 11:45 PM

I'm so disappointed this event didn't happen at a Trump armada rally.

#46 | Posted by a_monson at 2025-05-29 12:57 AM

In case you were wondering - YES - it was the usual suspects. Does not matter if it is a street corner, water park, or Memorial Day celebration. The usual suspects will end up shooting and killing a few of each other. The only good news is that despite 10 people being shot, not a single day of work will be missed.

#47 | Posted by ScottS at 2025-05-29 06:17 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Obama: America Dangerously Close to Being an Autocracy (71 comments)

A Texas Cop Used 83k Cameras to Hunt an Abortion Seeker (32 comments)

Trump Insists MAGA 'Hates' Fox News After Embarrassing Poll (25 comments)

Research: Social Media Now Main Source of News in US (25 comments)

Dodgers Say No ICE Here (20 comments)

Marijuana Use Dramatically Increases Risk of Dying (19 comments)

Trump Considering Asbestos Ban Reversal (17 comments)

Trump Brags About New Flag Poles at the White House (17 comments)

'Nobody is Talking to Hegseth' (17 comments)

Bipartisan House Bill to Limit Trump from Entering Iran War (16 comments)