Tuesday, June 03, 2025

What 'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Says for Trump's Golden Dome

Almost like it was a premonition, military analyst Max Boot warned in a Saturday Washington Post op-ed that the future of warfare wouldn't be fought with massive space-based missile shields, but with swarms of cheap, expendable drones. Less than 24 hours later, Ukraine delivered the proof.

More

I discussed the daring Ukrainian drone strike on the Russian airbases with my @postopinions.bsky.social colleagues Jim Geraghty and @dmarusic.bsky.social. bit.ly/4mKkD1Q

[image or embed]

-- Max Boot (@maxboot.bsky.social) June 2, 2025 at 10:04 PM

Comments

"With drone swarms now capable of crippling billion-dollar military infrastructure for a fraction of the cost, military analysts who spoke to Newsweek say the United States must reevaluate whether its missile defense priorities are geared for the future"or stuck defending a past that no longer exists.

Defense experts also say the Golden Dome fails the most basic test: relevance.

"Forget Trump's hugely expensive, impractical Golden Dome shield. Drones are the future of warfare," Boot wrote in a separate Washington Post opinion piece.

He pointed to Ukraine's goal of producing 4.5 million drones this year at an average cost of $580 each " a scale that dwarfs the Pentagon's current output.

For the same $25 billion earmarked for the Golden Dome's first phase, the U.S. could theoretically build more than 43 million drones."

;;

Yes, but would the 43 million drones have room for Trump's picture on them like missiles would.... huh, huh?? Gotta think about the important stuff first!

#1 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-02 03:48 PM

Max Boot reads and writes about the same things we do, but he is higher up in the Dante's Inferno of blogging than many of us.

Anyways, Ukraine is the expert on drone warfare and they are battle-tested. Operation Spiderweb expertly combined espionage with drone warfare.

China is doing quite well with drone technology, but they have yet to undergo the forge of war: youtu.be

#2 | Posted by C0RI0LANUS at 2025-06-02 04:29 PM

"the U.S. could theoretically build more than 43 million drones."

Which could saturate and overwhelm any defense system.

Trump wants Golden Dome for the usual reason, to prove to himself that is a big man.

#3 | Posted by Zed at 2025-06-02 04:59 PM

Pearl Harbor?

Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack by a nation that had not declared war on the US.

Russia invaded Ukraine to start the war, murders women and children bombing schools, hospitals and apartment buildings and steals children from Ukrainian families.

This attack is not even close to Pearl Harbo.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-03 07:01 AM

Trump wants Golden Dome for the usual reason,

Let's not forget to funnel billions and billions of tax dollars to Taco-lago members who in turn return money to him through his crypto scheme.

#5 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-03 07:03 AM

Pearl Harbor?
Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack by a nation that had not declared war on the US.
Russia invaded Ukraine to start the war, murders women and children bombing schools, hospitals and apartment buildings and steals children from Ukrainian families.
This attack is not even close to Pearl Harbo.

#4 | Posted by Nixon

In one sense it is: It's a wake up call that Russia, like the US, can be hit. It's a startling realization for many Russians as Pearl Harbor was for many Americans.

#6 | Posted by Sycophant at 2025-06-03 11:03 AM

"This attack is not even close to Pearl Harbor"

Well there's certainly no question if the President knew it was coming.

The comparison to Pearl Harbor is the losses to the fleet: "disabled or destroyed up to a third of Russia's long-range bomber fleet."

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-03 11:16 AM

Prolly the reason he's promoting this 'Golden Dome' is that he's looking pretty bald now, and as soon as it's all gone he'll have his own Golden Dome. (spray brush orange will have to do!)

#8 | Posted by Corky at 2025-06-03 01:45 PM

Wait. Isn't the big beautiful wall at the southern border enough to keep out drones, missiles and dark-skinned Spanish speakers? I was personally assured by our king that with the wall we would be safe. Or trapped, one or the other...

#9 | Posted by catdog at 2025-06-03 01:55 PM

It's a wake up call that Russia, like the US, can be hit.

I thought the drone attacks in Moscow last year said that though this was a far more serious blow.

It's not the first time Ukraine attached Russian airfields. I have to say that Zelensky is a little more restrained when it comes to targeting military targets rather than Putin blowing up women and children in hospitals like the terrorist he is.

#10 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-03 02:00 PM

If Iran or North Korea want to nuke the US they will just ship the bombs in via FedEx. Cheaper and nobody would know where it came from. It's too far to use trucks like Ukraine did.

#11 | Posted by SomebodyElse at 2025-06-03 02:00 PM

I was personally assured by our king that with the wall we would be safe.

And Mexico would pay for it.

#12 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-03 02:01 PM

That mission took a year and a half to pull off. Ukraine continues to develop the Hrim-2 SRBM, Paliantysia (a "turbojet drone" which is really just a cruise missile used in 1 way attacks), Peklo long ranged missile, etc. Short range quads don't remove the need for missile defense, it just adds another threat. Elon Musk is wrong, drones don't invalidate the F-35 either.

#13 | Posted by sitzkrieg at 2025-06-03 02:21 PM

Almost like it was 'nt obvious...

#14 | Posted by cabron_loco at 2025-06-03 02:49 PM

Russia invaded Ukraine to start the war, murders women and children bombing schools, hospitals and apartment buildings and steals children from Ukrainian families.
This attack is not even close to Pearl Harbor.

#4 | Posted by Nixon at 2025-06-03 07:01 AM | Reply | Flag: EH?

In the two years leading up to Pearl Harbor... Japan was aligning with the AXIS and trashing China in unspeakable ways... It occupied 20 countries... soooooooo

The US was warned PH was next on their list... Franklin thought it was a bluff... then boom boom bang bang... next thing you know we're interring Asians.

Japan made landfall in Alaska...

I think it's a fair comparison... if starting a war is a reason.

Do you think Russia can crank its war machine in response to Ukraine like we did to Japan?

#15 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-06-03 04:19 PM

Nixon's post is the most relevant of the day; especially after Putin hypocritically and ridiculously tried to label Ukraine's attack on the exact military hardware Putin uses to attack civillian targets in Ukraine every single day. butweakling Trump warns of sanctions but is too afraid of his master to do anything real. I think Zelensky and NATO understand that, as long as Putin's bitch is President, Ukraine and NATO will have to carry the war to Russia without U.S. help. But if the Russians want the war to end just hang Putin and the war will be over and the world will be better off! Much like when Hitler killed himself and did the world a huge favor. Putin is too much of a coward to do as Hitler did so the Russian people need to do it for him.

#16 | Posted by danni at 2025-06-04 10:41 AM

Woooooooooow, liberals prove how short-sighted they are every single day. All because they let their masters groom them so well.

If we ignore missile defense, guess what enemies throw at us? It's as if liberals actually think someone will say, "Well, missiles are so 1990s so we won't use them even when our target is vulnerable to them...we will use drones because they are shiny and new."

Please, for the love of God, if you are one of these liberals do NOT ever get into cybersecurity. Defense-in-depth is a crucial platform that is vital to a network's security. Based on liberals though, we should get rid of antivirus filters in email systems and not spend money on it because cybercriminals are using text messages to attack people. The enemy is going to use whatever you are vulnerable to, and it's a numbers game. They don't just choose one attack vector and call it a day. They automate multiple attack vectors to have the best odds of causing damage.

Missile defense is as important today as it has ever been. Just because a new type of attack is out there doesn't mean we can ignore traditional vectors. This is security 101.

And, what's even more hilarious is trying to say that the money could be spent on better things, like defense against drones instead of missiles. Ok, well, taxpayer money can be spent on a WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLE lot of more important things than changing pronouns and renamed government institutions on official government documents but that doesn't stop liberals from trying to get the US to spend that money instead of on, I don't know, the trillions of debt we are in.

So either way you come at the argument, you are coming across as uneducated and lacking any common sense or logic skills.

#17 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-04 11:32 AM

"I think Zelensky and NATO understand that, as long as Putin's bitch is President, Ukraine and NATO will have to carry the war to Russia without U.S. help"

Eerily similar to the Taliban's bitch being POTUS and allowing them to get what they want in the name of "withdrawaling". Sucks we can't get a POTUS in office who makes the right decision that agrees with all 340m+ people in our country. I mean, that is possible, right?

#18 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-04 11:34 AM

I mean, that is possible, right?

#18 | POSTED BY HUMTAKE

No. It's actually not possible. There will always be some differences among us.

And speaking of shortsightedness.

A missile defense systems capable of preventing a nuclear attack is internationally destabilizing and could actually precipitate a nuclear exchange. If indeed such a system was ever successfully developed (doubtful) just before it was able to be implemented a nuclear capable adversary like Russia would be under tremendous pressure to attack before they no longer could.

And having been in field with a TS SCI access I know that "security 101" is way more involved than just missile defense.

#19 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-06-04 11:59 AM

Eerily similar to the Taliban's bitch being POTUS

HumTrig, who was the bitch that released 5000 taliban fighters in 2020?

#20 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-04 12:01 PM

Slava Ukraini

#21 | Posted by AMERICANUNITY at 2025-06-04 12:03 PM

"Missile defense is as important today as it has ever been."

How many missiles would it take to intercept a million drones???

Republican Math is going to get us all killed.

#22 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-04 12:33 PM

Woooooooooow, liberals prove how short-sighted they are every single day. All because they let their masters groom them so well.
If we ignore missile defense, guess what enemies throw at us? It's as if liberals actually think someone will say, "Well, missiles are so 1990s so we won't use them even when our target is vulnerable to them...we will use drones because they are shiny and new."
Please, for the love of God, if you are one of these liberals do NOT ever get into cybersecurity. Defense-in-depth is a crucial platform that is vital to a network's security. Based on liberals though, we should get rid of antivirus filters in email systems and not spend money on it because cybercriminals are using text messages to attack people. The enemy is going to use whatever you are vulnerable to, and it's a numbers game. They don't just choose one attack vector and call it a day. They automate multiple attack vectors to have the best odds of causing damage.
Missile defense is as important today as it has ever been. Just because a new type of attack is out there doesn't mean we can ignore traditional vectors. This is security 101.
And, what's even more hilarious is trying to say that the money could be spent on better things, like defense against drones instead of missiles. Ok, well, taxpayer money can be spent on a WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLE lot of more important things than changing pronouns and renamed government institutions on official government documents but that doesn't stop liberals from trying to get the US to spend that money instead of on, I don't know, the trillions of debt we are in.
So either way you come at the argument, you are coming across as uneducated and lacking any common sense or logic skills.
#17 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-04 11:32 AM

What is your take on the New Jersey drones? Do you realize how long that was going on and how much footage was posted? For what purpose was that performed and by whom? To distract from what? While they were hovering near the nuclear plant, what was being done by our defenses? How did the government spin this?

"On December 17, 2024, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) presented an internal slideshow demonstrating that three alleged drone incidents"one during a medevac flight, one over the ocean, and another near a nuclear plant"were simply normal air traffic. Another report of a "drone" spraying mysterious mist could be explained by wing-tip condensation on a small airplane. The presentation included maps matching flight logs to specific sightings." [LINKY]

"This is fine.

Everything is fine."

#23 | Posted by redlightrobot at 2025-06-04 10:01 PM

Woooooooooow, liberals prove how short-sighted they are every single day. All because they let their masters groom them so well.

#17 | Posted by humtake at 2025-06-04 11:32 AM | Reply | Flag:GFY

Riiiiiiight... eight decades of war failure one after another. A couple of decades ago... our superior defense / weapons systems were usurped by box cutters and commerce.

Ya knowwwwwww... Trillions of dollars of time and research was spent during two decades of failed wars on how to defend our troops against the crap the locals were putting together out of rubble and gunpowder because when our superior expensive high tech(theoretically on the drawing table) and at the time the best in war machinery... in the world... when put to test failed against citizens unwilling to let a "superpower" dictate the running of their country... failed... we lost.

Republicl0wns plan for all the victory parades where our troops will be greeted as liberators... not for the reality of war.
Future super weapons so powerful they can't be used without risking all of humanity. YAY!

The "long game" you blather is just future-faking fantasy for feckless republicl0wns.

You have no credibility.

#24 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2025-06-05 09:10 AM

Drudge Retort Headlines

CBO: Trump's Bill will Add $2.4T to Deficit (131 comments)

US Hiring Cools to Slowest Pace in Two Years, ADP Data Show (60 comments)

Trump says he Spoke with Putin, Predicts No Peace Anytime Soon (32 comments)

Iran: US Nuclear Proposal is 'incoherent and disjointed' (32 comments)

Hegseth Orders Renaming of Ship Named After Harvey Milk (25 comments)

MAGA Reacts to Potential National Citizen Database (25 comments)

Musk's DOGE Goons Trashed Office and Left Drugs Behind (24 comments)

What 'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Says for Trump's Golden Dome (24 comments)

Musk Calls Trump Bill 'disgusting abomination' (23 comments)

China's Global Favorability Rising, Views of U.S. Plummet (18 comments)