Woooooooooow, liberals prove how short-sighted they are every single day. All because they let their masters groom them so well.

If we ignore missile defense, guess what enemies throw at us? It's as if liberals actually think someone will say, "Well, missiles are so 1990s so we won't use them even when our target is vulnerable to them...we will use drones because they are shiny and new."

Please, for the love of God, if you are one of these liberals do NOT ever get into cybersecurity. Defense-in-depth is a crucial platform that is vital to a network's security. Based on liberals though, we should get rid of antivirus filters in email systems and not spend money on it because cybercriminals are using text messages to attack people. The enemy is going to use whatever you are vulnerable to, and it's a numbers game. They don't just choose one attack vector and call it a day. They automate multiple attack vectors to have the best odds of causing damage.

Missile defense is as important today as it has ever been. Just because a new type of attack is out there doesn't mean we can ignore traditional vectors. This is security 101.

And, what's even more hilarious is trying to say that the money could be spent on better things, like defense against drones instead of missiles. Ok, well, taxpayer money can be spent on a WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLE lot of more important things than changing pronouns and renamed government institutions on official government documents but that doesn't stop liberals from trying to get the US to spend that money instead of on, I don't know, the trillions of debt we are in.

So either way you come at the argument, you are coming across as uneducated and lacking any common sense or logic skills.

"I think Zelensky and NATO understand that, as long as Putin's bitch is President, Ukraine and NATO will have to carry the war to Russia without U.S. help"

Eerily similar to the Taliban's bitch being POTUS and allowing them to get what they want in the name of "withdrawaling". Sucks we can't get a POTUS in office who makes the right decision that agrees with all 340m+ people in our country. I mean, that is possible, right?