We Analyzed Every Gun Case Since Bruen -- the Result Is Horrifying

Thursday, June 05, 2025

Bruen mandated that modern gun regulations align with historical firearms regulations ... Many judges have openly admitted they're not equipped to evaluate whether centuries-old statutes match modern-day restrictions.

Posted by retort at 10:30 AM | 28 COMMENTS | permalink

The Supreme Court's 2022 Bruen decision forced judges to act as firearm law historians -- a job some have openly admitted they're not equipped for. Post-Bruen, a gun regulation's fate now hinges on conflicting interpretations of America's complex and often uncomfortable past.[image or embed]
-- The Trace (@thetrace.org) June 4, 2025 at 8:17 PM

Comments

Repugs sanction gun violence.

time.com

#1 | Posted by reinheitsgebot at 2025-06-05 11:05 AM

Thanks, Second Amendment!

#2 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-05 11:42 AM

"At least three rulings in the past year have invalidated federal restrictions on machine guns, once considered settled law."

Republican Judicial Activism explains why failures of the Legislature and the Executive will not be resolved through legal challenges.

#3 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-05 11:46 AM

How about a challenge to rhw Supreme Court's ban on guns in the Supreme Court?

#4 | Posted by danni at 2025-06-05 11:54 AM

Dispense of incompetent criminal and crime loving leftist judges that support crime and criminals and America will be safe and pleasurable and have quality of life.

Democrats have tried to outdo each other with policies that make America Hell and claim criminals are victims. Tolerance for crime is never a deterrent.

#5 | Posted by Robson at 2025-06-05 12:35 PM

Anyone already convicted of a felony of commision of crime with a firearm needs to be held accountable and charged and taken off the streets. Too many leftist DAs in urban NYC etc let them go and Democrats are happy.

#6 | Posted by Robson at 2025-06-05 12:47 PM

"Tolerance for crime is never a deterrent"

Did you know that your President has 34 felony convictions?

Did you know those are 34 of the biggest reasons you voted for him?

#7 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-05 01:10 PM

"Anyone already convicted of a felony of commision of crime with a firearm needs to be held accountable and charged and taken off the streets."

So, every armed ICE Agent that detains a person (kidnapping) without a Warrant, without Probable Cause, without Reasonable Articulable Suspicion.

I agree.

#8 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-05 01:12 PM

Robson,

You're a blithering idiot.

Just wanted to make sure you knew that.

#9 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-05 01:20 PM

Robson,

JPW used to swallow ----- from his college friends.

Just wanted to make sure you knew that.

#10 | Posted by boaz at 2025-06-05 03:19 PM

Did you know that your President has 34 felony convictions?

No, that was just a liberal/progressive witchhunt to stop the American people from getting who they really wanted into the White House.

No one takes those "34 felonies" very seriously.

#11 | Posted by boaz at 2025-06-05 03:20 PM

No one takes those "34 felonies" very seriously.

Other than the court.

#12 | Posted by REDIAL at 2025-06-05 03:32 PM

re: #12

Or people who haven't been lobotomized by far-right propaganda

#13 | Posted by hamburglar at 2025-06-05 03:36 PM

"Did you know that your President has 34 felony convictions?"

"No, that was just a liberal/progressive witchhunt."

He is gulty, you know it, and you just don't care.

You are a broken man, Boaz. For you are a victim of the Democrats.

#14 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-05 04:45 PM

"Thanks, Second Amendment!"

Every day. Unlike you, I don't hate the constitution.

#15 | Posted by willowby at 2025-06-05 09:20 PM

No one takes those "34 felonies" very seriously.
#11 | POSTED BY BOAZ

This is why America is falling apart.

Republicans believing the rule of law is subjective.

#16 | Posted by ClownShack at 2025-06-05 09:31 PM

If there were "rule of law", Hillary would be in jail.

#17 | Posted by boaz at 2025-06-06 07:47 AM

Trump had four years to "Lock her up" and did nothing but talk ----. Didn't even investigate her.

You've been had. Again.

#18 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-06-06 08:08 AM

Trump had four years to "Lock her up" and did nothing but talk ----. Didn't even investigate her.

You've been had. Again.

#19 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-06-06 08:08 AM

Try reading the 5th amendment trump loves so much before lecturing anyone on "the rule of law" you dope.

#20 | Posted by Alexandrite at 2025-06-06 08:10 AM

"Thanks, Second Amendment!"
Every day. Unlike you, I don't hate the constitution.
#15 | Posted by willowby

Sure.

Guns are the leading cause of death for children in America.

Take a victory lap, Willowby. This is the America you love.

#21 | Posted by snoofy at 2025-06-06 08:59 AM

"Trump had four years to "Lock her up" and did nothing but talk ----. Didn't even investigate her."

And has still done nothing.

Boaz is a pathetic, ignorant fool.

#22 | Posted by Angrydad at 2025-06-06 10:29 AM

No one takes those "34 felonies" very seriously.

#11 | Posted by boaz

I love it how this piece of s*&^ constantly tries to validate his nonsensical beliefs by reassuring himself that he's in some sort of majority or larger group.

Hey d*(&head, you're in a very small minority. Have you not taken basic math? Ever?

#23 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-06 10:50 AM

If there were "rule of law", Hillary would be in jail.

#17 | Posted by boaz

Jesus Christ you really are a stupid f*&^. I can't believe my taxes float your worthless a&^.

#24 | Posted by jpw at 2025-06-06 10:51 AM

" Didn't even investigate her."

Tell me you've been asleep for four decades, without using those specific words.

FFS, the Republicans have NEVER stopped investigating HRC. And the fact they went after her on Benghazi, just shows how weak everything else was.

FTW, Hillary had to testify, under oath, for 11 hours, all about why she didn't send troops to save the American victims.

FTA, the Secretary of State isn't even in the military chain of command.

#25 | Posted by Danforth at 2025-06-06 11:57 AM

Every day. Unlike you, I don't hate the constitution.
#15 | POSTED BY WILLOWBY

Then why do you dishonor it and yourself (everyday) by supporting a gross misinterpretation of it?

#26 | Posted by donnerboy at 2025-06-06 01:18 PM

Dispense of incompetent criminal and crime loving leftist judges that support crime and criminals and America will be safe and pleasurable and have quality of life.
Democrats have tried to outdo each other with policies that make America ---- and claim criminals are victims. Tolerance for crime is never a deterrent.
#5 | Posted by Robson at 2025-06-05 12:35 PM

Robson, did your Russian/English translator have the day off, or what?

#27 | Posted by john47 at 2025-06-06 05:24 PM

#26

"Then why do you dishonor it and yourself (everyday) by supporting a gross misinterpretation of it?"

Do you have Joementia? I agree with the Supreme courts interpretation as the final arbiter.

Speaking of dishonor, the only ex/former Marines are the ones with OTH discharges. How did you get yours? Was it fainting dead away when they handed you an actual assault rifle?

#28 | Posted by willowby at 2025-06-06 05:56 PM

Drudge Retort Headlines

Maxwell told DOJ Trump Never did Anything Concerning Around Her: Sources (78 comments)