Mainstream media ignoring Trans who killed 10 kids

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Canadian police confirmed ten deaths and at least 35 injuries following a mass shooting at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School in British Columbia. The shooter, who also killed himself, was identified by a close family member as Jesse Strang, a transgender person identifying with she/her' pronouns. According to media reports, an active shooter alert was issued at 3.15pm Mountain Time (MT) by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), covering a large area including Chetwynd and Dawson Creek.

Posted by boaz at 02:40 PM | 104 COMMENTS | permalink

Comments

Yall wont post it, but I will.

#1 | Posted by boaz at 2026-02-11 02:41 PM

It's time to put all two hundred trans people in America into camps. Never mind that most shooters are young cis white males.

-MAGA

You're so deeply obsessed with trans people.

You're either sexually attracted to women with a penis, or you want to be a woman with a penis.

Probably both, actually.

"Jesse Strang, a transgender person"

You ever think if you treated trans people with basic human decency, they wouldn't have so many mental health challenges?
You ever think of just being nice to strangers.

No, it's never occurred to you to just be nice to people.
I bet your parents treated you like ----.
I bet you're proud of it.

Why would American media cover news of a mass shooting in Canada when we stopped caring about mass shootings in America a long time ago.

This happened yesterday. Boaz posts it ten minutes after they ID the shooter as trans and whines about the "media" not covering it.

So, what does that make the count in the Northern Hemisphere?

A hundred or so Rwing White Nationalist (mostly Incel) shooters vs a couple of lefties and a trans?

The reason that the DHS and FBI have for decades now stated that most Domestic Terrorism, including mass shootings, in this country is perpetrated by Boaz's rwing buddies is that it's true... and no amount of One-Off shootings by someone else changes that FACT.

My wife and I met a couple a few weeks ago who own a few small apartment buildings (3 or 4 units per brownstone).

These people aren't oligarchs, one is an auto mechanic and I forget the wife's profession.

Anyways, this couple only rents out to LGBTQ tenants because they said "they don't trash the place" like previous heterosexual tenants they've suffered with.

Why would American media cover news of a mass shooting in Canada when we stopped caring about mass shootings in America a long time ago?

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-11 02:56 PM | Reply | Flag: Quite true.

Typical Rightwing response to mass shootings:

Was the shooter black, a minority, LGBTQ?

That person - and all people like that person - should be thrown into prisons and kicked out of America.

Was the shooter a white man?

He was just having a bad day. Boys will be boys. What can we as a nation do about it? Nothing can be done. Thoughts and prayers. Let's move right along.

Also.

Shouldn't schools have metal detectors? Shouldn't teachers be armed? Shouldn't students be armed? More guns for everyone!

Was the shooter black, a minority, LGBTQ?

I'm sure they have been hitting the refresh button on the story for 24 hours just to find that out.

I am rather curious where she got the gun from.

"Police are so terrified of "misgendering" they're calling the suspect a "gun-person" instead of gunman."

LOL

usually, the focus is on the gun and how we need to get rid of them but since it's Canada, maybe that argument isn't relevant.

This matters more to Boaz than Trump raping children.

In 2025 there were 425 mass shootings in the US; 420 were killed and 1,898 were wounded.

What makes a single mass killing, and not even in the USA, worth posting about, Major DEI Boazo?

-Was the shooter black, a minority, LGBTQ?

you forgot rightwing, which you're always rooting for.

You make it sound like you're different than Boaz.

The mainstream media is ignoring the horrors Trump's federal administration is unleashing on Minnesota.

Americans are being denied their civil rights by ICE, aka Trump's Gestapo.

Meanwhile Boaz has Google alerts turned on for any news about transgender people.

What a ------- weirdo.

you forgot rightwing
#16 | POSTED BY EBERLY

They wouldn't allow it if I tried.

Much like Trump, you're all attention whores.

Read your post if you need an example.

"usually, the focus is on the gun and how we need to get rid of them"

The focus is on trans people and how we need to get rid of them.

Boaz has Google alerts turned on for any news about transgender people.
What a ---- weirdo.

#17 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-11 03:33 PM

usually, the focus is on the gun

I'd like to know if the shooter owned the gun. If not, I'd like to know why whoever did own it did not have it secured.

-They wouldn't allow it if I tried.

they allow it here.
"
Attention whore" look at this attention seeking post...."He was just having a bad day. Boys will be boys. What can we as a nation do about it? Nothing can be done. Thoughts and prayers. Let's move right along."

-Dramashack

Born male, identified as female.

So according to Republican ideology it was a white dude that shot up a school.

Color me shocked.

#22 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Are you denying white men constitute the majority of mass shooters in America?

Are you denying media coverage of white male shooters uses different language than if the shooter had been Black, a minority or LGBTQ?

Here's an added bonus, Republicans love starting gofundme accounts for white mass shooters.

Why would American media cover news of a mass shooting in Canada when we stopped caring about mass shootings in America a long time ago.

#5 | Posted by ClownShack at 2026-02-11 02:56 PM | Reply | Flag:

I would counter by saying that Canadian shootings are rare enough to merit attention.

There have already been 25 mass shootings in America in 2026, can anyone point to one our mainstream news outlets covered?

www.gunviolencearchive.org

it was a white dude

"Van Rootsleaar" does sound pretty white.

#24 Dramashack

what's the point of those questions? No, I don't deny any of that but that's irrelevant to my point.

I said YOU run to the political affiliation of a shooter just like others run to the race or sexual orientation.

The political affiliation matters as much to you as the sexual orientation does to Boaz.

"I said YOU run to the political affiliation of a shooter just like others run to the race or sexual orientation."

Boaz does that too, by proxy.
Black Shooter is never Black Shooter.
Gays, browns, Muslims shooters? All Democrat Shooters.

Black Ghetto is always Democrat Plantation too.

The political affiliation matters

My view of the matter doesn't change based on the identity of who the shooter is.

Find any post of me from any thread, ever, where I defend the shooter based on their political affiliation.

What an idiot you are.

Meanwhile.

For people like Boaz, that's all that matters.

Keep spinning, *itch.

Maybe sooner or later you'll posting something worth discussing.

Trump should start posting about Trans more....

... obviously it's more interesting than the Epstein Files, Russia's Rape and Murder of Ukraine, the Economy, Trump's Crypto and other scams, ICE still today violating people's rights in MN and all around the country... the US AG lying her ass off to Congress and ignoring the Victims and the Perps.... and so much more that matters so much more.

I'm for boycotting these asinine threads from asinine posters like Boaz and Jeff.

Besides, they prolly need some couple time.

-Find any post of me from any thread, ever, where I defend the shooter based on their political affiliation.

You're denying you've made an issue out of the political affiliation of the shooter in the past?

You're denying you've never sought out their political affiliation and blamed their actions on the right wing trash message that's corrupted them?

Boaz: "Why isn't anyone paying attention to the trans shooter! The media is ignoring it!"

Me: "Mass shootings don't receive attention these days. Your only interest is that the shooter is trans."

Eberly: "Political affiliation!"

I like the "Royal Canadian Mounted Police arrives at the scene of the shooting" picture at the top of the article.

It's from a shooting event in Nova Scotia six years ago. Looks like the "Hungarian Conservative" needs to update it's stock photo collection.

Boaz: "Why isn't anyone paying attention to the trans shooter! The media is ignoring it!"
Me: "drama drama drama drama drama........"
Eberly: "Political affiliation matters to almost everyone!"

#33 | Posted by DramaShack

The political affiliation matters as much to you as the sexual orientation does to Boaz.
#28 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Of course "political affiliation" and political ideology matter.

We need to know whether they are terrorists or not.

If they are Republicans and they murder someone AND they support Trumpy's lies then they are NOT terrorists.

If they are democrats or liberals and they commit a crime (and even if they do NOT commit a crime) and they are on the "list" then they are terrorists according to a Presidential Executive Order and National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7).

So. Yes. We need to know.

-Of course "political affiliation" and political ideology matter.

Not to Dramashack. He's denying he makes that the issue.

At least you admit it with a defense for it.

Donnerboy: "We need to know the political affiliation of the shooter!!!"

see, clown? you're different? No.....you're not different.

You're denying you've made an issue out of the political affiliation of the shooter in the past?

You're denying you've never sought out their political affiliation and blamed their actions on the right wing trash message that's corrupted them?
#32 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Yes or No:

1) Are you denying the fact the majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists in America are Rightwing morons?

2) Are you pretending I change my opinion about mass shooters based on their political affiliation?

3) Were you triggered because I accurately described rightwinger's fluctuating opinions about criminals based on the race, gender, sexual preference and political affiliation of the criminal?

Honestly. I think you saw something I posted and were eager for my attention.

#34

Was Dudley Do-Right there? You know, there was talk that Nell was trans!

What about Sgt. Preston and Yukon King? (who was actually Yukon Queen!)

Answer my questions first. Just get it over with already.

Admit you run to the political affiliation of the shooter faster than Boaz does.

but here's the thing....you accurately point out the reality about mass shooters which justifies your desire to run the political affiliation of said shooter as fast as Boaz runs to the sexual orientation of them.

So, it's not the same thing, right?

You're justified in rushing to label the shooter.....whereas Boaz isn't.

"Admit you run to the political affiliation of the shooter faster than Boaz does."

Boaz started this thread, so I think it's pretty clear who's champing at the bit to be the first to link the shooter to a demographic.

Donnerboy: "We need to know the political affiliation of the shooter!!!"

see, clown? you're different? No.....you're not different.

POSTED BY EBERLY

Neither are you. Because you have no choice.

We dont necessarily WANT to know. We have to know. Now.

It is now a requirement that has been foisted upon us by the President of the United States by making it a central issue and dividing all of America over it. Trumpy has made it an absolute requirement to know. Because your political affiliation NOW can and will be used against you in a Court of Law under Trumpy's AG, Pam Bondi.

-It is now a requirement that has been foisted upon us

A lifelong government employee if I ever saw one.......

Answer my questions first.

You poor, poor thing. Don't worry about it. The questions were rhetorical. I already know the answers.

Admit you run to the political affiliation of the shooter faster than Boaz does.
#40 | POSTED BY EBERLY

If you actually read my first post it was more of a, "who gives a shht about a mass shooting in Canada when we don't care about mass shootings in America."

You really suck at psychoanalysis and are generally wrong when you do your Nostradumas routine.

Republicans base their opinions about everything - like whether pedophilia is bad - on the political affiliation of the people committing the crime.

Eberly is no different. He's furious - despite the shooter being Canadian - this hasn't turned into a discussion about the shooter's political affiliation yet.

Perhaps Redial would be a better target since I couldn't name the political parties in Canada if my life depended on it.

-You really suck at psychoanalysis

you always say that when you're identified for exactly what you are......a leftwing version of Boaz.

-Perhaps Redial would be a better target

what do you mean, "target"?

The only "target" you make out of anybody here is Bill Johnson who walks into it every time.

Clown doesn't disagree with my point.

He's just......justified.

eb- Boaz STARTED the thread by identifying the shooter as trans, and whining the MSM isn't covering it.

Are you trying to say that isn't somehow politcal?

you always say that when you're identified for exactly what you are...

I love how self assured you are despite all facts to the contrary.

It's this ignorant confidence that really makes America the greatest nation on the planet.

Are you trying to say that isn't somehow politcal?
#47 | POSTED BY ALEXANDRITE

He's not really saying anything.

Just trying his hardest to troll.

His every post on this thread has been directed at me because clearly I nailed him with #10 and he can't stop yelping.

-Are you trying to say that isn't somehow politcal?

No, I'm saying it's exactly as political as when Clown whines that a white guy in Texas hasn't been prosecuted for shooting his daughter and it's all because he's white and a Trumper.

It's the same kind of political. That's what I'm saying.

-I love how self assured you are

Thanks.

"I nailed him with #10"

My first post was #16. And the only point here you're bleeding out over is that you're Boaz.

Everything is political when you want it to be. Just like Boaz tried to make this issue.

How dare Boaz make this shooting political when we have a Texas shooting (not a mass shooting BTW) that's a domestic violence incident that hasn't generate the justice clown thinks he deserves.

Do I think the fact the shooter is trans should matter and be a debated political issue? absolutely not.

It's a mass shooting. I don't think this event, despite how awful it is...should be political. Or at least the sexual identity of the shooter shouldn't be political.

I'm saying it's exactly as political as when Clown whines that a white guy in Texas hasn't been prosecuted for shooting his daughter and it's all because he's white and a Trumper.

It's the same kind of political. That's what I'm saying.
#50 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Hey stupid.

You haven't explained how my response is political.

Point out any mass shooting where I responded based on the persons political affiliation.

Meanwhile, you bring up an example of Republicans ignoring a murder because the murderer happens to be a Trump supporting white guy.

And that's supposed to support your argument, how?

Why don't you stop all your whining and provide proof rather than posting your alleged bullshht.

"I nailed him with #10"

My first post was #16.

Yep. Whining about #10. Thanks for confirming.

I didn't read the rest of that steaming pile.

You literally haven't posted anything on this thread worth reading.

It's obvious you're only looking for attention.

How desperate.

-You haven't explained how my response is political.

no, I haven't, stupid. Why would I.

You make it political when you make it political. I wasn't talking about a single post. I was talking about YOU.

Point out any mass shooting where I responded based on the persons political affiliation.

You're still going with the notion you don't make shootings about the shooter's political affiliation?

You liar.

Everyone is cringing for you at this point. Of course you make it about the political affiliation of the shooter when you want to.

You're just not doing it here. Instead, you deflect with how shootings don't matter anyway to the press.

I see what's killing you here. I'm comparing you to Boaz. That's what this is all about.

You're so ------- pissed I'm comparing you to boaz that you resort to denying that you make an issue out of the PA (political affiliation) of a shooter whenever you want.

And at the same time you're doing exactly what you're denying you do on another thread.

-I didn't read the rest of that steaming pile.

so there is no point in arguing with you....if you won't read my posts.

Go ---- yourself then.

You make it political when you make it political.

#10 really cut you deep.

The truth hurts. Clearly it's scarred you.

I wasn't talking about a single post.

You aren't talking about anything, you're just whining.

Like a kid who isn't getting his way.

I was talking about YOU.

That's because your entire world revolves around me.

You're still going with the notion you don't make shootings about the shooter's political affiliation?

It seems difficult for you to accept that some people are against all mass shooters regardless of their political affiliations. Most likely because of what I posted in #10.

You hear about a mass shooting and immediately start wondering how to justify it if the shooter was one of your Deplorable Trumping brethren.

Remind me again, how much did you send to Rittenhouse's gofundme?

Boaz started this thread, so I think it's pretty clear who's champing at the bit to be the first to link the shooter to a demographic.

No, I was posting this to show that liberals/progressive media cherry picks who to put on front page headlines if it matches their ideology.

And I am right.

there is no point in arguing with you

Especially when you show up unarmed.

Face it, you got trolled by Boaz.

And I am right.
#58 | POSTED BY BOAZ

Yea.

You and Eberly are always right.

It's easy when you simply ignore reality.

Poor pathetic piece of s%^# boaz.

-That's because your entire world revolves around me.

LOL........

I'm just gonna let you calm down somewhat before you turn into Twoothy on us.

You're getting dangerously close to it, IMO.

"You hear about a mass shooting and immediately start wondering how to justify it if the shooter was one of your Deplorable Trumping brethren.
Remind me again, how much did you send to Rittenhouse's gofundme?"

Holy fagballs. I compare you to Boaz and this is how you respond.

interesting........

-It seems difficult for you to accept that some people are against all mass shooters regardless of their political affiliations.

of course they are........but that doesn't stop you from making it about the political affiliation of the shooter.

and that's fair game as far as I'm concerned.

But you are offended if someone dares make it about something else.

Only you have license to make it political. Everyone else has to STFU.

What was it Rogers said 10 or 15 years ago about what killed this site?

Oh, yeah... "the bitchiest bitching bitches".

Whatever you say, ----.

#65

Thanks for the confirmation!

of course they are........but that doesn't stop Boaz from making it about the gender identity of the shooter.

Boaz can make it about the sex/gender identity of the shooter....and Clown can make it about who they voted for.

Ain't we got fun!!!

but that doesn't stop you from making it about the political affiliation of the shooter.

On this thread. You're the only one talking about political affiliation of the Canadian Trans shooter.

Just you.

You seem very concerned about it.

Have you figured out which party they were affiliated with?

But rather than acknowledge that, Clown decides to accuse me of defending mass shooters, when he knows I'm on the record as squarely on the left with regards to gun rights. I don't own a gun.

poor thing......

No, I was posting this to show that liberals/progressive media cherry picks who to put on front page headlines if it matches their ideology.
And I am right.
#58 | Posted by boaz

So the real story here is:

Boaz is a victim of the liberal/progressive media, because they don't promote his stories to the front page.

"Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people" is widely attributed to Socrates.

Rwingers discuss trans, immigrants, and abortions.... or whatever else Trump tells them to think about.

-You're the only one talking about political affiliation of the Canadian Trans shooter.

I haven't done that once.

I said you care about it when you want to care about it.....just like Boaz.

I never have to make anything political. I have you to do it for me. And Boaz.....

Usually, I stay out of those arguments.

I only jumped into this one because you're clearly just like Boaz and woefully unaware of that fact.

And i'm enjoying enlightening you of that fact......

Clown can make it about who they voted for.
#68 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Have you figured out who the Canadian Trans shooter voted for?

Face it. You're crying because I stated the majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists in America are rightwing morons.

Your fight isn't with me, it's with reality.

Bozo.

-Have you figured out who the Canadian Trans shooter voted for?

of course not.

again, I have you for that task. And I don't care anyway.

A good executive always delegates....

-I stated the majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists in America are rightwing morons.

and I agree with you. Jesus, you're ------- dumb.

from the article:

"Reports that the perpetrator kept guns at home and shared shooting videos on a transgender-themed gun forum are intensifying alarm over the dangers of transgender ideology to young people and society."

The danger isn't from the transgender ideology.
The danger is from the pro-gun ideology.

I don't care anyway.
#75 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Your post count on this thread indicates otherwise.

I agree with you.
#76 | POSTED BY EBERLY

Of course you do.

You never actually argued about anything I posted.

You simply assigned me a strawman and proceeded to argue.

Have you figured out who the Canadian Trans shooter voted for?

of course not.

He/she is not even an American. And the crime did not happen in America.

It's only significant to this administration if they are an American or not. Or whether they are democrats.

Bozo is only concerned whether they are trans.

And you are only concerned with how good your troll is and whether you owned a "lib".

I accurately assigned actions and positions to you.

And you don't like it.

Everyone else here is simply justifying their actions and positions.

You're pretending you're above them or something.

You're just like Boaz when it comes to what's important to you.

Boaz: the injustice of the media ignoring the sexual identity of a mass shooter

Clown: the injustice of a white, right wing perp who killed someone not being prosecuted for the crime

you're both making it about what you want to make it about.

-And you are only concerned with how good your troll is and whether you owned a "lib".

That's the closest thing to the truth you've posted towards me.

I'm comparing you to Boaz. That means I'm comparing Boaz to you at the same time so it's not owning a lib. It's an equal opportunity "own"

-Your post count on this thread indicates otherwise.

You're lying. You KNOW I don't care about that. I agree only Boaz cares about it.

Geez.........Does it hurt to be worked this hard?

Wait.....nevermind. That's probably a little out of bounds.....

gotta run......

The danger isn't from the transgender ideology.
The danger is from the pro-gun ideology.

#77 | POSTED BY SNOOFY

Yeah nah....

trans gender killers/trangenders > guns used in killing/number of guns.

Y'all wont post it, but I will.

#1 | Posted by boaz

Yes, there are reasons you will post it and "we" will not. Very good ones that you won't acknowledge.

No charge for the apostrophe in y'all, Mr. Confused Southerner.

trans gender killers/trangenders > guns used in killing/number of guns.

#83 | Posted by oneironaut

Yes...

There are 17,000 firearm murders in the US per year.

So...There are at least 17,001 trans murderers in the US?

trans gender killers/trangenders > guns used in killing/number of guns.
#83 | Posted by oneironaut

Republican Math, we missed you!

Latest update says the shooter killed her mother and stepbrother at home before going to the school.

A "modified handgun" and a long gun of unknown origin were found at the school, neither registered to the shooter. Shooter had an expired gun license.

Also reporting that the RCMP had visited the residence several times in the last few years, over "mental health issues".

On one occasion firearms were removed from the residence, but were later returned.

"Latest update says the shooter killed her mother and stepbrother at home before going to the school."

Wondering if she was bullied harder at home or at school...

how many isn't the issue.

it's the silence and...you guessed it...you 2 faced hypocritical slime ball

useless monkey butt prix.

Canada mass shooting suspect had mental health issues
www.dw.com

... The teenage shooter, who killed six people at a school after slaying her mother and stepbrother, had a history of police visits to her home.

Police identified the suspect in the deadly Tumbler Ridge shooting in Canada as an 18-year-old local woman who had a history of police visits to her home to check on her mental health.

She is suspected of shooting dead six people at the local high school on Tuesday after killing her mother and stepbrother at home.

Police revise death toll down

The suspect killed eight people, police clarified, and not nine as had been previously reported.

The confusion came after they mistakenly thought a victim airlifted to a hospital had died, police commander Dwayne McDonald said at a press conference on Wednesday.

Motive for Tumbler Ridge mass shooting still unknown

McDonald said the motive for the shooting wasn't yet known and police hadn't found a suicide note.

He identified the suspect as transgender, saying that she began to transition to female six years ago and identified as female both "socially and publicly."

The suspect was known to officers who had made multiple visits to their home in response to mental health calls, McDonald said.

She was "apprehended for assessment and follow up" under the Mental Health Act and taken to the hospital on occasion, he said.

Officers had seized weapons from the shooter's residence, he said, and had been subsequently returned.

McDonald said no guns were registered in the name of the shooter. She had previously held a gun license, but this had lapsed. ...

@#91

So, it seems to give credence to the NRA assertion that it is not the gun, but the mental health of the person.

If so, why does the GOP seem to be so against mental health checks for gun owners in the US?

Officers had seized weapons from the shooter's residence, he said, and had been subsequently returned.

McDonald said no guns were registered in the name of the shooter. She had previously held a gun license, but this had lapsed. ...

I finds that to be the interesting part.

Adam. Not sure who Eric is.

Lanza vibes

I tend to agree.

@#94, 95 ... Eric Lanza vibes.... Adam. Not sure who Eric is. ...

Yeah, my search engine of choice seems to refer to this when I searched for Eric Lanza ...

Adam Lanza
en.wikipedia.org

... Adam Peter Lanza (April 22, 1992 " December 14, 2012) was an American mass murderer who perpetrated the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.[8] Before the shooting, Lanza killed his mother at their home in Newtown, Connecticut. ...

@#97 ...

I have to also mention, the memory of that horrific occurence still lingers in this part of Connecticut.

These Sandy Hook survivors say memories of classmates inspire us' as they graduate from Newtown (June 2024)
www.newstimes.com

... In the beginning there were only flashes too disturbing for first-grade minds to reconcile -- alarming things they had never heard or seen.

Bangs and loud popping that would not stop. SWAT teams with big guns in the hallway. Chaos in the parking lot. Strong grownups crying inconsolably. News that friends would never come back.

But as time passed and first graders who survived the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre put distance between themselves and that Dec. 14 morning when everything changed, an uncommon kind of closeness seemed to enshroud them. From a police officer at the door on Christmas day with gifts, to teachers who always anticipated their needs, to the solidarity of classmates who shared the trauma that day, survivors made their way through the seasons of childhood feeling embraced by a closeness that some of them recognize today as one of their saving graces.

"It was such a dark time, and you can feel so alone, but it was really difficult to feel alone in Newtown because everyone came together so close," said Lilly Wasilnak, a 17-year-old at Newtown High School who is graduating in just a few days.

"We were all like a big family ... and the Sandy Hook kids, even if we didn't stay close friends, we always had each other to go back to"

As the mass shooting survivors entered high school and began to process what happened in 2012 when they were too innocent to understand, some survivors came to realize that the 20 first graders and six educators who didn't make it out of Sandy Hook Elementary School that day never really left them, but remained present in an inspirational way. ...

...