"Police are so terrified of "misgendering" they're calling the suspect a "gun-person" instead of gunman."

LOL

usually, the focus is on the gun and how we need to get rid of them but since it's Canada, maybe that argument isn't relevant.

-Was the shooter black, a minority, LGBTQ?

you forgot rightwing, which you're always rooting for.

You make it sound like you're different than Boaz.

-They wouldn't allow it if I tried.

they allow it here.
"
Attention whore" look at this attention seeking post...."He was just having a bad day. Boys will be boys. What can we as a nation do about it? Nothing can be done. Thoughts and prayers. Let's move right along."

-Dramashack

#24 Dramashack

what's the point of those questions? No, I don't deny any of that but that's irrelevant to my point.

I said YOU run to the political affiliation of a shooter just like others run to the race or sexual orientation.

The political affiliation matters as much to you as the sexual orientation does to Boaz.

-Find any post of me from any thread, ever, where I defend the shooter based on their political affiliation.

You're denying you've made an issue out of the political affiliation of the shooter in the past?

You're denying you've never sought out their political affiliation and blamed their actions on the right wing trash message that's corrupted them?

Boaz: "Why isn't anyone paying attention to the trans shooter! The media is ignoring it!"
Me: "drama drama drama drama drama........"
Eberly: "Political affiliation matters to almost everyone!"

#33 | Posted by DramaShack

FT

-Of course "political affiliation" and political ideology matter.

Not to Dramashack. He's denying he makes that the issue.

At least you admit it with a defense for it.

Donnerboy: "We need to know the political affiliation of the shooter!!!"

see, clown? you're different? No.....you're not different.

38

Answer my questions first. Just get it over with already.

Admit you run to the political affiliation of the shooter faster than Boaz does.

but here's the thing....you accurately point out the reality about mass shooters which justifies your desire to run the political affiliation of said shooter as fast as Boaz runs to the sexual orientation of them.

So, it's not the same thing, right?

You're justified in rushing to label the shooter.....whereas Boaz isn't.

-It is now a requirement that has been foisted upon us

A lifelong government employee if I ever saw one.......

-You really suck at psychoanalysis

you always say that when you're identified for exactly what you are......a leftwing version of Boaz.

-Perhaps Redial would be a better target

what do you mean, "target"?

The only "target" you make out of anybody here is Bill Johnson who walks into it every time.

Clown doesn't disagree with my point.

He's just......justified.

-Are you trying to say that isn't somehow politcal?

No, I'm saying it's exactly as political as when Clown whines that a white guy in Texas hasn't been prosecuted for shooting his daughter and it's all because he's white and a Trumper.

It's the same kind of political. That's what I'm saying.

-I love how self assured you are

Thanks.

"I nailed him with #10"

My first post was #16. And the only point here you're bleeding out over is that you're Boaz.

Everything is political when you want it to be. Just like Boaz tried to make this issue.

How dare Boaz make this shooting political when we have a Texas shooting (not a mass shooting BTW) that's a domestic violence incident that hasn't generate the justice clown thinks he deserves.

Do I think the fact the shooter is trans should matter and be a debated political issue? absolutely not.

It's a mass shooting. I don't think this event, despite how awful it is...should be political. Or at least the sexual identity of the shooter shouldn't be political.

-You haven't explained how my response is political.

no, I haven't, stupid. Why would I.

You make it political when you make it political. I wasn't talking about a single post. I was talking about YOU.

Point out any mass shooting where I responded based on the persons political affiliation.

You're still going with the notion you don't make shootings about the shooter's political affiliation?

You liar.

Everyone is cringing for you at this point. Of course you make it about the political affiliation of the shooter when you want to.

You're just not doing it here. Instead, you deflect with how shootings don't matter anyway to the press.

I see what's killing you here. I'm comparing you to Boaz. That's what this is all about.

You're so ------- pissed I'm comparing you to boaz that you resort to denying that you make an issue out of the PA (political affiliation) of a shooter whenever you want.

And at the same time you're doing exactly what you're denying you do on another thread.

-I didn't read the rest of that steaming pile.

so there is no point in arguing with you....if you won't read my posts.

Go ---- yourself then.

-That's because your entire world revolves around me.

LOL........

I'm just gonna let you calm down somewhat before you turn into Twoothy on us.

You're getting dangerously close to it, IMO.

"You hear about a mass shooting and immediately start wondering how to justify it if the shooter was one of your Deplorable Trumping brethren.
Remind me again, how much did you send to Rittenhouse's gofundme?"

Holy fagballs. I compare you to Boaz and this is how you respond.

interesting........

-It seems difficult for you to accept that some people are against all mass shooters regardless of their political affiliations.

of course they are........but that doesn't stop you from making it about the political affiliation of the shooter.

and that's fair game as far as I'm concerned.

But you are offended if someone dares make it about something else.

Only you have license to make it political. Everyone else has to STFU.

64

Whatever you say, ----.

Boaz can make it about the sex/gender identity of the shooter....and Clown can make it about who they voted for.

Ain't we got fun!!!

But rather than acknowledge that, Clown decides to accuse me of defending mass shooters, when he knows I'm on the record as squarely on the left with regards to gun rights. I don't own a gun.

poor thing......

-You're the only one talking about political affiliation of the Canadian Trans shooter.

I haven't done that once.

I said you care about it when you want to care about it.....just like Boaz.

I never have to make anything political. I have you to do it for me. And Boaz.....

Usually, I stay out of those arguments.

I only jumped into this one because you're clearly just like Boaz and woefully unaware of that fact.

And i'm enjoying enlightening you of that fact......

-Have you figured out who the Canadian Trans shooter voted for?

of course not.

again, I have you for that task. And I don't care anyway.

A good executive always delegates....

-I stated the majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists in America are rightwing morons.

and I agree with you. Jesus, you're ------- dumb.

78

I accurately assigned actions and positions to you.

And you don't like it.

Everyone else here is simply justifying their actions and positions.

You're pretending you're above them or something.

You're just like Boaz when it comes to what's important to you.

Boaz: the injustice of the media ignoring the sexual identity of a mass shooter

Clown: the injustice of a white, right wing perp who killed someone not being prosecuted for the crime

you're both making it about what you want to make it about.

-And you are only concerned with how good your troll is and whether you owned a "lib".

That's the closest thing to the truth you've posted towards me.

I'm comparing you to Boaz. That means I'm comparing Boaz to you at the same time so it's not owning a lib. It's an equal opportunity "own"

-Your post count on this thread indicates otherwise.

You're lying. You KNOW I don't care about that. I agree only Boaz cares about it.

Geez.........Does it hurt to be worked this hard?

Wait.....nevermind. That's probably a little out of bounds.....

gotta run......