When Congress debates whether to send U.S. forces into harm's way, the financial discussion typically centers on near-term operational costs: troop deployments, weapons systems, logistics, and sustainment. Two veteran lawmakers argue this framing leaves out one of the most predictable and enduring consequences of war: the obligation to care for those who return home. Their proposal, the Full Cost of War Act, seeks to hardwire that obligation into the earliest stages of any future conflict decision.
Drudge Retort Headlines
Third American Death Linked to ICE Crackdown (68 comments)
Trump Already TACOing on Iran (47 comments)
Look How Much Canadians Hate the United States Now (27 comments)
FCC Carr Urges Broadcasters to Air 'patriotic, Pro-America' (21 comments)
Armed Man Shot and Killed by SS Outside Mar-a-Lago (19 comments)
Mom of Hospitalized Child: 'I still wouldn't have given my son the vaccine' (18 comments)
All Commercial Drivers Will Have to Take Test in English (17 comments)
'Don't go to the US -- not with Trump in charge' (17 comments)
15,000 at Large After ISIS Detention Camp Collapses (17 comments)
HUD Proposes Rule that Would Force Noncitizens from Public Housing (17 comments)